Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
vibefix

vibefix

by VibeFix-Technologies
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

vibefix_get_bounty

Retrieve complete details of a specific bug bounty by ID, including description, expected vs actual behavior, reproduction steps, and tech stack to understand and address the issue.

Instructions

Get full details of a specific VibeFix bug bounty by ID, including description, expected vs actual behavior, steps to reproduce, and tech stack.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "bountyId": "<bountyId>"
    },
    "name": "vibefix_get_bounty"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bountyIdYesThe bounty ID (from vibefix_list_bounties)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.3.3

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavior. It lists return fields but does not explicitly state the operation is read-only or disclose side effects, auth needs, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with no redundant information; essential details are front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-ID tool without output schema, the description adequately explains what is returned and the source of the ID, making it complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema description, meeting the baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies the action 'Get full details' and the resource 'specific VibeFix bug bounty by ID', listing included fields, distinguishing it from list and post siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Indicates the ID comes from vibefix_list_bounties, implying usage after listing, but does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools