vibops-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to vibops-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceZero-quota GPU orchestration MCP server — lets AI agents discover, provision, and manage GPU compute across multi-datacenter partner nodes (H100/H200/B200) through a single control plane.174 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceGoverned Kubernetes operations for AI agents with 15 MCP tools, audit logging, policy engine, and safety features.55MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns any AI coding agent or MCP client into a governed DevOps engineer by exposing policy-enforced tools for Kubernetes, Docker, Jira, Git/PR, CI/CD, AWS, Terraform, and incident response, with approvals, audit logging, secret redaction, and rollback enforced outside the model.3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAI Agent Mission Control — 200+ MCP tools across 31 domains. Manage agents, experiments, workflows, crews, skills, tools, credentials, approvals, signals, budgets, marketplace, knowledge bases, chatbots, and more. Self-hosted, open-source (AGPL-3.0). Supports stdio + Streamable HTTP/SSE with OAuth 2.0 auth.3468AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides real-time monitoring of AI agents, context, usage limits, workflows, files, Git, tests, builds, errors, secrets, and model-economy advice for tools like Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor, with 30 MCP tools for comprehensive observability.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Guard Server - Budget control, approval workflows and audit logging for AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, ChatGPT)MIT
TDQS
Scored across 74 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with detailed descriptions. Even closely related tools like list_anomalies and get_open_anomalies differ in scope and are well explained, preventing confusion.
Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_agent_identity, list_clusters). Subsystem prefixes like registry_, helm_, and slurm_ are used uniformly, maintaining a predictable structure.
With 74 tools, the server covers a vast scope. While each tool is justified, the count far exceeds typical well-scoped ranges (3-15 tools) and falls into the 'too many' category, making navigation challenging.
The tool surface is broad but has notable gaps: missing delete_secret, cancel_job (non-Slurm), and create/update/delete for pipelines. Core workflows are covered, but lifecycle operations for some resources are incomplete.