orchestration_feedback

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are all false and description does not add behavioral context. 'Update orchestration memory' implies mutation, but no side effects or requirements disclosed. Minimal additional transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, front-loaded with action and return value. Efficient, though could be slightly more structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks context on prerequisites (e.g., existence of run) and detailed explanation of 'constraints for orchestration_rerun'. Adequate but incomplete for 6-parameter tool without output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description does not add meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as description provides no extra parameter context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (store correction, update memory) and resource (orchestration run), and mentions return value. Distinguishes from sibling tools like orchestration, orchestration_memory.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use vs alternatives. Among siblings, there is no comparison or exclusion criteria. Implied usage but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.