Skip to main content
Glama

Verinoda

PyPI npm Python CI License

Durum / Status: BETA. Verinoda beta aşamasındadır: çekirdek komutlar (scan, update, query, analyze, trace, check, review) ve MCP çekirdek araçları kullanıma hazırdır; docs/DESIGN.md'de "partial" olarak işaretli özellikler deneyseldir ve değişebilir. Cevaplar kanıt satırlarıyla verilir, ama yanlış olabilir: kritik kararlarda kanıtı kendiniz okuyun. Hiçbir doğruluk, güvenlik ya da uygunluk garantisi verilmez. Verinoda is in beta: the core commands (scan, update, query, analyze, trace, check, review) and the core MCP tools are ready for use; features marked "partial" in docs/DESIGN.md are experimental and may change. Answers come with their evidence lines but can be wrong: read the evidence yourself before a critical decision. No warranty or guarantee of correctness, security or fitness for any purpose is given (Apache-2.0 "AS IS" terms in LICENSE). Performance claims are published only with their measurement (model, version, date, raw logs). Published: 0.4.0 (beta) on PyPI and npm (2026-10-01; 0.3.0 and 0.3.2 on 2026-09-27, 0.1.0 and 0.2.0 on 2026-09-26). Formerly developed under the working name "RepoAtlas".

What is in this snapshot (2026-10-01)

Part

State

Release

0.4.0 (beta), 2026-10-01: pip / pipx / uv tool install verinoda, npx verinoda; 0.4.0 brings D60-D136: a smaller MCP menu with a gateway and the Grep hook (D60-D62), running a project's own tests safely (D63), faster scans and fewer false calls (D65, D66), and the competitor backlog's first 65 items - code health, dead code, cycles, clones, hotspots, temporal coupling and ownership; breaking API changes, differential findings, risk scores, suggested reviewers and SARIF in and out; architecture rules as code, a violation baseline, decision lifecycles and what a merge made stale; the test-to-code map, affected tests and projects, flaky history, coverage import, property test templates and bisect over debug attempts; tours, named maps, Mermaid and graph exports, a project brief and a ranked repo map; structural search, typed notes, memory history, bi-temporal claims and background consolidation; Sentry and OpenTelemetry trace import, IaC nodes and spec checks; and Minecraft mod checks (lang keys, access wideners, undeclared symbols, client/server separation, pack collisions, shaderpacks). The atlas.db schema goes from v6 to v9 on the first command (docs/UPGRADING.md). 0.3.2 (the tag v0.3.1 published nothing: its workflow file did not parse): a release build names its commit in verinoda --version, less noise in an answer and a 100x faster history view (D58), settings read by a string key for config questions (D59). 0.3.0 added Minecraft mod and JVM analysis (when, Mixin edges, GameTests, backlog links, Java access checks, datapacks, trace-log, shaders: D47-D54), English questions over Turkish-named code (D55), shorter analyses and Java overloads (D56, D57); run verinoda scan . once after upgrading (docs/UPGRADING.md). 0.2.0 added documents and images (D41), a faster update and update --fast (D42, D44), and the name check for Java, Kotlin and TypeScript/JavaScript imports (D43, D45, D46); built and published by .github/workflows/release.yml (PyPI Trusted Publishing, npm with provenance), GitHub release v0.3.2

Documents and images (docs/DESIGN.md D41, 2026-09-26)

PDF, Word, Excel and PowerPoint files in the repository are read as text (a heading per page, sheet, slide or Word heading), become graph nodes and search passages, and are quoted as evidence that can be checked again; on Windows the text in screenshots and diagrams is read with the OCR engine built into Windows (no model, nothing downloaded; textures, icons and small images skipped; VERINODA_OCR=0 turns it off). analyze answers from a PDF page with a verified claim, and the claim goes stale when the PDF changes. Not read: scanned PDFs without a text layer, audio, video

Java name check (verinoda check, D43, 2026-09-26)

Java files are checked against the project's sources, its classpath and the JDK: imports, types, methods with their number of arguments, fields, constructors and Fabric Mixin targets (@Inject(method = ...), @Shadow, @Accessor, @Invoker). The classpath is read from a Fabric Loom build or set in code_check.classpath; the JDK's API from its ct.sym. On a real Minecraft 26.2 mod: 126,848 sites, 0 false absents, 2.3% unknown, 4.7 s; 8 of 8 planted invented names caught with the real one as the nearest (PlayerEntity -> Player). Not checked: Kotlin, argument types

Kotlin name check (verinoda check, D45, 2026-09-26)

Kotlin files are checked in the same world as Java (the project's Java and Kotlin sources, the classpath, the JDK; Java code now sees the project's Kotlin classes, objects and companions): imports, types, and members and properties on receivers of known type (a Java getter counts for a property). Kotlin keeps more names open, and they stay unknown: extensions (the project's, and the libraries' read from their file facades and @kotlin.Metadata), smart casts after is/as/when in the same function, Kotlin's built-in types, calls without a receiver, the number of arguments, and anything in a file tree-sitter-kotlin does not parse completely. On kotlinpoet (86 files, 15,090 sites, kotlin-stdlib as the only jar given): the 10 absents are kotlin-reflect's extensions that classpath lacked; 6 of 6 planted names caught

TypeScript/JavaScript imports (verinoda check, D46, 2026-09-26)

The invented name an agent writes most often on the web is an import. Checked: a relative path that names no file, a package not in node_modules (not_installed), and a name a module does not export - resolved as TypeScript does (extensions and index files, tsconfig baseUrl/paths, a package's types, exports map and @types, declare module, export * chains, export = of a namespace, CommonJS module.exports). Where the exports are not all known, unknown; a default import is judged only against the project's own files. Calls, members and types are not checked, so such a file stays listed under not_checked (exit 4 unless something is absent). A sample with 6 planted names (useEfect, react-router v6's missing useHistory, ...): all caught with the real name nearest; ky (67 files, 594 sites): 0 false absents

Minecraft mods and the JVM (D47-D54, 2026-09-26)

verinoda when Class.method: the events that lead to a method (tick, server thread, handlers registered by reference or lambda, Mixin injections, #minecraft:tick) and the conditions around each call on the way; Mixin handlers are injects edges; the registered GameTests that reach a change are listed by impact and review; verinoda backlog links backlog items and the comments that cite them; the Java check flags members out of reach and constructors no argument list fits, verinoda api reads Java classes; .mcfunction files are in the graph (verinoda datapack: tags checked but never added, objectives never read, calls to missing functions); verinoda trace-log maps a log's stack traces and GameTest results onto the code; verinoda shader links GLSL uniform blocks and the Java that fills them

English questions over Turkish-named code (D55, 2026-09-26)

a symbol's doc comment is its own search text; the Turkish-English seed dictionary is read backwards for code tokens (on a 30-question mixed set of a Turkish-named mod: top-3 8/30 -> 18/30)

Answers read as a person would (D56-D59, 2026-09-26/27)

an analysis says the changed files once, without repeated uncertainties (-1.6 % characters, same facts); Java overloads are separate symbols and a call binds to the overload its argument count fits; "how does X work" with one subject is answered by what X calls (an inference), not by unrelated entry-to-storage paths; a storage question gets the paths through its own code; "what breaks if I change X" names X's callers at their call sites; the JSON answer keeps room for the next candidates (JSON facts 253 -> 262 over the nine benchmark sets); context the critique refuted is counted, not printed; a why-answer quotes the section that gives the reason; a config question also finds settings read by a string key and the file line that sets them

Faster update (D42, 2026-09-26)

Same graph, faster: Leiden communities in native code by default, graph.json written through json's C encoder, memoised path work; about 12% on Verinoda's own repository with Leiden on both sides (31-38 s -> 27-33 s), more without the old Leiden extra. An update proportional to the change is not done yet

update --fast (D44, 2026-09-26)

The changed files are taken in at once (search index, lexicon, syntax facts, stale claims) and the graph is rebuilt by a background verinoda update: on Verinoda's own repository 3.4 s instead of 27-33 s, and the new function is searchable at once. Until the background build ends no snapshot is recorded, so query, trace, map and the MCP tools keep naming the files the graph is behind on; the graph it then makes is the one a full scan makes (compared node for node and edge for edge: 29,039 nodes, 68,611 edges). The MCP index_update takes this path by itself when the last graph build took over 15 s. The graph build itself still reads the whole corpus

Graphify port (verinoda/project_index, tests_upstream/)

done. Upstream suite at port time: 5436 passed / 50 failed, and every failure also fails on unmodified upstream on the same Windows machine; not re-run since (docs/UPSTREAM.md)

Core: claims, evidence, critique, experiments, research/compare, feedback, memory, installers, MCP server (40 tools)

implemented

Round 3: search engine, question plans with Turkish support, reference resolver, trust engine (anchors, entailment, facet-level staleness), runtime observation, precise call resolution

implemented and wired into the CLI, MCP and analyze; gaps per decision in docs/DESIGN.md ("Implementation status")

Product test suite

3,881 passed, 27 failed, 6 skipped, 2 deselected at 8868179 (before D134-D136), Windows 11 / Python 3.13, 2026-10-01: 26 failures are installer and setup tests that depend on this machine's environment (they fail the same way on every recent run), one was a test of the MCP review's key order, fixed since; D134-D136 ran their own tests

Agent integration

Claude Code (/verinoda) and Codex ($verinoda) verified in real headless sessions with the earlier skill text (docs/AGENT-VERIFICATION.md); the round-3 skill text (understand-first and references protocols) has no such record yet

Benchmarks (measured, docs/BENCHMARKS.md, chars/4 token estimates, gold facts found in the delivered context; no model in the loop)

Graphify's own code (226 files, 37 facts, in-sample): Verinoda text retrieval 36/37 at 1,424 tokens/question, ~0.14 s; Graphify 7/37. Set on Verinoda's own earlier code (33 facts): 25/33 vs Graphify 8/33 and raw reading 9/33; it was held out until the 2026-09-23 ranking change, which was chosen with it in view (22/33 before). Turkish paraphrases of the example app: 32/32. Regressions: analyze on the example app 32 -> 31/32, the one-off scan of the large corpus got slower (6.7 s -> 14.7 s cold), and the 2026-09-23 change adds about 0.03 s per retrieval on the large sets

Game mods and data files (2026-09-24)

data packs, JSON/yml configs and other data files indexed; resource-id links between code and data; reference trees; Java calls the extractor drops; translation pairs from locale files. New example set glow_mod (a small fictional Fabric mod, 50 facts): Verinoda text retrieval 48/50, JSON 44, analyze 43, against raw reading 33 and Graphify 13; at 32a5bd4 it was 34 / 25 / 18. Held out only for its first measurement (46 / 32 / 25). A second set written afterwards and measured once, forge_mod (NeoForge, Java and Kotlin, 68 facts): text 63, JSON 45, analyze 38 (at 32a5bd4: 43 / 28 / 26), raw reading 36, Graphify 12; after two more review rounds that looked at four of its questions (so in-sample), final official run: 66 / 50 / 42. The five earlier sets against the pre-mod baseline dogfood-2026-09-23: graphify_core analyze 30 -> 29, graphify_core_tr JSON 16 -> 15 and text 25 -> 26, heldout_repoatlas JSON 20 -> 21, the rest unchanged (docs/BENCHMARKS.md, benchmarks/results/mods-2026-09-24/final/)

Notes and graph view (verinoda ui, 2026-09-24)

a note per symbol, file, section and data file with its code and links, the line each link is written on and editor links; a 3D graph with a panel that says what is in view, follow, a walk through a file's links, regions, a tour and a watch list; a command bar (Ctrl+K, English or Turkish); a preview on hover; notes of your own anchored to the code (up to date / code changed / code gone, verinoda notes); impact and path; what changed since the index; the answer to a question; local graph per note, global graph at file level, search, file tree; the open page follows the index (--watch also runs update); a one-file export; a local server that writes only your notes, no external assets. Checked in Chrome on the forge_mod example and on Verinoda's own repository (1,115 files in the global graph); fourteen browser tests drive it in headless Chrome or Edge (skipped without one); measured on Python's standard library as a project (2,305 files, 79,526 notes: Notes and graph view)

Answer quality (2026-09-25)

analyze carries the passages query gives (on the seven public sets 204 -> 267 gold facts, query 265); "met" only on claims about the question (met with none of the gold facts in the claims 2 -> 0); an analysis lists the claims that answer first (the handler's findings, the product's code before tests) and the rest as context; 82 more Turkish stems and multi-part questions; query/queries and cluster/clustered one token; update of Verinoda's own repository 34 -> 27 s, 21 s when the edit leaves the graph as it was (the command, wall clock, quiet machine; an earlier "35 -> 28 s" came from a timing script that left part of the work out); the first question in a git project indexes it; benchmarks can score a final answer written by any command (--answer-cmd; no model run yet). A new in-sample set of Turkish user questions about Verinoda scores 11/30: see Known limitations (docs/BENCHMARKS.md, Update 2026-09-25)

Truth rules (docs/DESIGN.md D31, 2026-09-25)

Four ways a false sentence reached a verified or "likely" status are closed. Word overlap with the cited lines never verifies (only a verbatim contains: quote, which verifies just the quoted text, or a kind's typed check does); a written claim that says more than its check binds (another callee, a condition, a negation, another file) stays unverified. Written claims bind every role (caller and callee in the text's direction, a config text's subject to the name the read is bound to). claim add runs the definitive checks at once and prints their scope (no call in the caller's whole body, a setting bound to another name, a reversed order with --kind order, a definition the file does not have). A name written as code that the repository does not have is not_found with did_you_mean in analyze, plan check and trace, never replaced by a similar name. On a copy of the example app the design pass's 9 false sentences went from 2 verified + 2 "likely" after critique to none (3 contradicted when created); three rounds of adversarial review (about 150 probe sentences) found and closed further ways around the rules. The benchmark sets lose no gold fact. In-sample fixtures; no held-out set of false sentences yet. Since 2026-09-26, outside Python a config or relation claim, and a call hop of a flow, is strong_inference at most: a pattern finds the environment read and the syntax tree the call, but nothing binds the claim's subject or caller (a TypeScript "jwtSecret is read from DISCOUNT_THRESHOLD" was statically_verified). A static resolver's definitive answer (SCIP) still verifies

Name check (verinoda check, verinoda api, D32, 2026-09-25)

Python here; Java since 2026-09-26 (see Java name check). Since 2026-09-26 a file in another language (named, under a named directory, changed in the diff, or a snippet's --as; a notebook and Cython count too) and a Python file that does not parse are listed under not_checked with the reason, never parsed as Python and never counted as checked. Exit 3 stays "something absent or a version differs from the lock"; exit 4 means "nothing absent, but something asked for was not checked", so a CI gate or a hook can tell the two apart. A broad except Exception no longer counts as a guard for an attribute, keyword argument or dict key inside it (the site stays absent; swallowed_by names the handler); it still guards an import. Do the modules, imported names, attributes, keyword arguments and constant dict keys code uses exist in the project's own environment (.venv/venv/env or --env)? absent only when the container's names are all known (closed world), otherwise unknown with the reason; nearest real names and where else the name is defined. Nothing from the checked project is imported or run. Measured after three review rounds: in-sample fixture of 144 generated sites (79 invented, 65 real, runtime oracle) 74 of 74 absent verdicts right and 74 of 79 invented names caught; 0 false absents on Verinoda's own package, Graphify's code, standard-library packages and the reviewers' probe sets (about 20,800 sites) and on click/pluggy/h11/starlette (8,525 sites); check --diff of 30 changed lines about 1.2 s in a fresh process. 26-44% of sites stay unknown by design. Not done: mod config keys and resource ids, JS/TS

Decisions stay human (verinoda decide, D33, 2026-09-25)

A "should we / which one / how will this scale" question is human_decision_required, never met: decide brief gathers the code's side (forces with evidence, what is absent with what was searched, decisions on record, options) and at most 5 questions only the user can answer, with no recommendation. The user's explicit choice becomes a Markdown decision record (decided-by: human) with guards (only_in, no_edge, dependency, governs, revisit_when, and since D95 the architecture rules layers, allow_edges and public, whose globs may name tag:NAME sets from [architecture.tags] in verinoda.toml); decide check finds code that breaks a recorded decision (exit 1 on VIOLATED, exit 3 when something was not checked, usable in CI; --changed/--base for new ones only). Since 2026-09-26 a guard that checked no file, edge or manifest is unknown, never ok, and every ok says what it counted. The records' folder can be committed: [decisions] dir = "docs/decisions" in verinoda.toml, [tool.verinoda.decisions] dir in pyproject.toml, or --decisions-dir; a folder named there that does not exist, or a fresh clone with no record but ADR-like files, fails with exit 3 instead of passing. Dependency guards read the workspace packages the root declares (globs matched as npm, yarn and pnpm match them) and Gradle version catalogs. Measured on 54 guard mutations over the example projects: 25/25 VIOLATED right, no VIOLATED on benign code (the old regex exclusivity check: 7 right, 8 false alarms, 6 missed on the same orders_app cases). Honest limit: on questions the rules were not tuned on, a choice question is recognised about half the time (the skills tell the agent to run the brief itself for any choice question); a missed one is judged by the intent it got - at most met_with_inference when its words may ask for a choice ("best", "smarter"), and it can still end met without such words

Debug ledger (verinoda debug, D34, 2026-09-25)

Every attempt at fixing one symptom is recorded against one repro command: the tree it ran on, the patch against the base, the failure as exception at file::symbol, progress. Definitive loop rules stop the agent (tree or file reverted, the same failure back, no progress, a test edited instead of code, edits the failing test never reaches); heuristic ones warn (error moved, masking, a repeated hypothesis). Strategies run in throw-away copies: the repro at the base with the diff's hunks ranked, a bisect that runs both ends first, reruns for flakiness, a traced run. Verinoda never says "fixed": a session closes only on a pass of the repro command on the current tree. In-sample benchmark of 12 scripted sessions: 11/11 definitive findings right, 8/8 loops caught, 0/4 controls stopped; a review found 25 distinct problems (false "passed", false stops, unverified bisect ends), all fixed with tests. Not measured: a real agent with and without the protocol. Found while debugging a flaky test in a real mod (2026-09-26): a Minecraft GameTest run's failures are now read from its summary ("N required tests failed" and the "- ns:test_id: message" lines under it), not from an exception the server logs while it starts, and a test id is mapped to its test method when exactly one test class and method spell it; debug close --resolved-by refuses when the baseline passed and every failing run came after an edit (those failures are the edits' own; show the symptom first, for example with debug rerun on the base tree, or close with --abandoned)

Change review (verinoda review, D35, 2026-09-25)

For a diff, a staged change or a planned one (--target FILE::NAME --change body|signature|remove): the changed definitions (comments and whitespace are not changes), who depends on them with the via-chain, and findings by concern: persistence (a write reached, Python value flow), security (risky operations, removed or weakened guards), performance (IO or queries in loops, hot paths), public API (call sites that no longer fit), config and entry points; which tests reach the change (static, observed, --run-tests) and which code no test reaches; a read_first list packed to a character budget. Risk findings (security operations, IO in loops) are split against the base: by default only the ones the change introduced are listed, the preexisting and fixed ones under differential (--findings all lists the preexisting ones too). Measured on labelled fixtures over the example projects: precision 0.92 and recall 62/62 in-sample, precision 0.81 on the held-out set (0.79 on its only clean run, below the 0.8 bar; most false positives are entry points); 67-100% fewer items than the impact view. Unknown stays unknown: "no finding" never means safe

Behaviour probe (verinoda probe, D36, 2026-09-25)

Python only. For a changed function: inputs from its signature, annotations, call sites and boundary constants, run on the old and the new version in throw-away copies, compared; differences are reported as behaviour changes (not bugs), with the example and an optional pinning test. A side-effect gate refuses functions that write files, open sockets, start processes or keep global state it cannot isolate, and says why. Measured on hand-written fixtures and mutants (in-sample): 22/22 planted regressions and 25/25 mutants found; 5 of 60 behaviour-preserving edits reported, all float rounding marked as such; the gate refused 9 of 9 unsafe functions and none of the safe ones. It says "no difference found in N inputs", never "verified". Since 2026-09-26 an environment variable set while a library module loads (numpy sets OPENBLAS_MAIN_FREE when it is imported) is not a side effect, so the functions of a project that uses numpy are no longer all refused; project code that sets one (at import, in a call, or through a library function such as load_dotenv) still is

Exact names and a fresh index (docs/DESIGN.md D37, 2026-09-26)

trace, map --view impact and MCP node_inspect resolve a name the same exact way: a copy of the project that scan detected (or a reference tree) gives way to the original, then definitions in tests, examples, fixtures and vendored folders give way to the product's own, and a helper nested in a function to a module- or class-level one; what is still tied is listed as ambiguous (what gave way under set_aside) and none is picked, and impact is never computed for a similar name (...::NoSuchThing gave 80 affected on the standard library; now it is unresolved, exit 2). plan check no longer asks you to choose between a copy and its original, and the receiver-call pass no longer links a copy's calls into the project. One index build runs at a time per project: a second update waits and says who is building (no [WinError 2], no scan --force hint). query, trace, map and the MCP read tools say "N file(s) changed since the index" with the list; a name only a changed file spells is "not in the index yet", never a similar name. analyze does not charge the refresh to its budget and, on a big project where the refresh would be slow, answers from the previous index and names the stale files (the MCP server then updates in the background). The eight benchmark sets find the same facts per question as before

Token cost (docs/BENCHMARKS.md, "token wins", 2026-09-26)

What a model reads got shorter with no gold fact lost, found or shown, on the eight public sets (86 questions, 319 facts) or on 10 out-of-sample questions (chars/4 tokens). Per question: analyze as the skill reads it 3,901 -> 1,873 tokens (-52%: its --json before, its text now; 287 facts found, 219 shown), MCP analyze 2,832 -> 2,037 with 15 more facts found (287), query text 1,313 -> 1,310 with 2 more (285 found, 213 shown); Graphify's two renderers deliver 68-69 found and 8 shown at 1,391-1,480. Per session, before the first question: about 7,330 tokens (the skill ~4,240, the core MCP menu ~2,490 plus ~500 of instructions, doctor --brief ~100) against about 20,500 before (the MCP menu of every tool alone ~12,500) and about 11,600-12,000 for Graphify (skill plus MCP menu). Measured on the token-wins branch, when the core profile had eleven tools; change_review joined it at the merge and the merged skills are longer, neither measured again. No model in the loop

Honest verdicts (D39, 2026-09-26)

analyze says met only for answers about what was asked. A definition answers only "where is it defined"; "which code uses X" needs code that uses X; "where is X ticked" needs a tick of X itself; claims only from a reference tree, a detected copy or a vendored folder never make it met; a callers answer names the call sites the graph did not resolve ("3 call sites unresolved: loop/transport.py:9, ...") and stays met_with_inference; a commit line is not a reason; "which X are not listed in Y" is not_supported. A verdict only goes down, no claim is dropped. On a public regression set of 17 traps and 22 controls (verinoda benchmark verdict-audit, written by the rule author): wrong met 9/23 -> 0/23 on dev and 8/16 -> 1/16 on held-out; controls kept 13 -> 12 and 7 -> 7; no benchmark fact lost

Cross-platform

tested on Windows 11; CI (Linux, Windows, macOS x Python 3.10/3.12/3.13) runs on every push since 2026-09-25 - its first run found and fixed macOS isolation, macOS path forms in the export and the Python 3.10 call tracer

Known limitations (see also docs/DESIGN.md for per-decision gaps):

  • A Turkish question about a repository whose code is English but whose UI strings and docs are Turkish (Verinoda itself) finds the Turkish text first: the verinoda_user_tr set scores 13/30 (query text and analyze; 11/30 before an English code word in a Turkish question stopped taking the names it merely appears next to, 2026-09-25), against 36/37 on the English graphify_core. Each dictionary gloss of a Turkish word still counts as its own search term, which is why adding correct dictionary entries has not helped yet. Two fixes were measured and not kept (docs/BENCHMARKS.md, Update 2026-09-25): weighing such words below their translation cost a mod set, where those words are how the data files are found.

  • On Windows with Python 3.10 or 3.11, a source file nested thousands of levels deep can crash the extractor: the upstream pipeline raises Python's recursion limit to 10,000, and before Python 3.12 that can exhaust the C stack before a RecursionError (found by CI, 2026-09-25; Python 3.12+ and other systems are not affected).

Open findings of the second acceptance audit (2026-09-23 05:00), not yet fixed:

  • A project's tests are its own code: they run under process isolation only in a project the user trusts (verinoda trust); an untrusted project's tests run in a container (docker/podman) or are refused. Pytest @file arguments, -p plugins, -o addopts=, paths outside the copy or naming an environment variable, and the same in the project's pytest config files are refused. OS confinement without a container is not done yet.

  • Running scan/init/observe with the home directory itself as the project is not refused.

  • Questions that are only partly about the code can come back met with verified but irrelevant claims.

  • The reference resolver can still merge or drop references in some multi-reference sentences. Fixed on 2026-09-24: "PR #123 and issue #456 in psf/requests" bound both numbers to the local project's origin remote (an owner/repo after a preposition, or before "reposundaki"/"'teki", is now a repository reference when its sentence is about git objects; fractions, protocols, word pairs and folders such as 1/3, HTTP/2, read/write, services/billing are not); a bare number keeps the origin remote over a repository named in another sentence, and with two repositories in a sentence each number goes to the one written after it. A name right before a version ("fancylib 2.31") is looked up in the project's ecosystems, then PyPI, npm and crates.io, only with --network on; by default it stays unbound, common words and units ("took 2.5 seconds", "macOS 14.2") are never package names, and only a clearly written name ("the X package", a name before v0.3) makes the result partial with a question.

  • Fixed after that audit: user claim add --kind with unrelated text no longer verifies; .verinoda/ and .git/ files are no longer accepted as evidence; packaging is now a declared dependency.

Found by running Verinoda on its own repository (2026-09-23), not yet fixed:

  • update rebuilds the code graph over the whole corpus when a file of the graph or a new code file changed (unchanged files come from the AST cache): about 33 s on a repository of about 2,100 files, about 27 s on Verinoda's own repository (about 1,200 files), 21 s when the edit leaves the graph as it was (34 s before the per-file caches and the kept graph of 2026-09-25, on the same quiet machine; 44 s before each path was resolved once per build, measured under load) and 94 s on Python's standard library copied as a project (2,305 files, 79,526 nodes; measured before that change), so verinoda ui --watch trails an edit by that much; edits to other files (data files, documents outside the graph) only refresh the search index. The upstream incremental pass was faster (about 20 s) but lost the cross-file edges of every file it re-extracted, so after an edit a function's imports and calls into other files were missing until the next full scan (fixed 2026-09-24). analyze refreshes first without charging it to its 60 s budget; on a project of 300 or more files where the last graph build took over 15 s (or over 200 files changed, or another build is running) it answers from the previous index and names the changed files instead, and the MCP server starts verinoda update in the background. Run verinoda update . when you want the answer on the new code. Two builds of one project never run at once: the second waits (the CLI up to 10 minutes) or, where it may not wait, does nothing and says who is building.

  • A frozen copy of the code inside the repository (here benchmarks/corpora/heldout_repoatlas_7371990/) answered self-queries unless it was marked by hand (verinoda setup . --reference benchmarks/corpora=heldout,snapshot). Since 2026-09-24 scan and update find such copies themselves and rank them the same way (see Reference trees); a copy they cannot tell apart from the original still needs --reference. (Fixed on 2026-09-24: command names now map to their handlers, scan komutu -> cmd_scan.)

Game mods and data files (2026-09-24):

  • The kind of resource an id names is taken from a fixed table of command words and JSON keys; an id in plain Java is "kind not stated" (an inference) unless one file carries it. Bare names count only as an argument of an id constructor or of a helper whose name says what it loads.

  • The extra call pass covers Java and Kotlin only. Turkish stems that folding merges (öl die / ol be) are matched as written only in retrieval; the question plan still reads folded words.

  • Windows only so far. The POSIX resource limits and the container isolation path (docker/podman) are coded but have never been run.

  • experiment, observe and analyze --run-tests/--observe run the project's own tests. Under process isolation (the default) the command's path arguments are confined to a throw-away copy, but the tests themselves can read and write outside it and use the network. Only run them on code you trust (experiment run --isolation container needs docker/podman and has not been tried against a real one).

  • Test runs and observation are Python/pytest only. They use the project's own .venv/venv when it has one, otherwise Verinoda's interpreter; pytest must be installed there, or the run is inconclusive. The fast tracer needs Python 3.12+ (sys.monitoring). The fallback is much slower, and child processes are not traced.

  • Precise call resolution is optional (verinoda[precise], jedi) and covers Python only. Without it, method calls on typed parameters stay strong_inference. Other languages need a SCIP index that you produce yourself (scan --scip FILE).

  • Turkish questions work but trail English. The Turkish question sets and the intent gold table were written by the rule author, so those scores are in-sample.

  • Staleness of relation claims is tracked at the level of the whole calling function, so edits elsewhere in that function can mark a still-true claim stale.

  • Some reference mismatch codes fire only in narrow cases, PEP 740 provenance is not used for pinning, and there is no authenticated GitHub access.

  • No model-in-the-loop measurement exists. Token counts are chars/4 estimates, and the harness scores whether gold facts are present in the delivered context, not answer accuracy.

The sections below describe the product; where they are ahead of the code, the lists above say so.

Evidence-first codebase analysis for people and coding agents.

Verinoda looks at a repository as a running system: code, call and data flow, tests, configuration, git history, decision records and, when you let it, targeted test runs. It answers questions as claims with evidence. Every claim carries a status (statically_verified, experiment_verified, strong_inference, unknown, stale, …), the exact file:line or commit it rests on, and what is still uncertain. When a claim can't be supported, it says unknown and names the next check to run. Questions may be in English or Turkish. References in them (repositories, versions, packages, PRs, papers) are pinned to the exact version the user meant before anything is compared.

Verinoda is derived from Graphify (commit 20a20d30, Apache-2.0). It is an independent project, not an official Graphify release. See docs/UPSTREAM.md. The name "Verinoda" was checked as free on PyPI, npm and GitHub on 2026-09-23 (see docs/NAMING.md); 0.1.0 and 0.2.0 were published there on 2026-09-26 from the tags v0.1.0 and v0.2.0, 0.3.0 and 0.3.2 on 2026-09-27 from v0.3.0 and v0.3.2, 0.4.0 on 2026-10-01 from v0.4.0 (docs/RELEASING.md).

Install

Verinoda is a Python package (verinoda on PyPI, with a small verinoda wrapper on npm). Pick one:

uv tool install --link-mode copy "verinoda[precise]"   # recommended: isolated, uv fetches a Python if needed
pipx install "verinoda[precise]"                       # the same with pipx
pip install "verinoda[precise]"                        # into the current environment (Python 3.10+)
npx -y verinoda --version                              # Node users: runs the PyPI release through uvx / pipx / a private venv
uvx --from "verinoda[precise]" verinoda --version      # run once without installing

On Windows, get uv first with winget install --id astral-sh.uv -e (then open a new terminal) and run uv tool update-shell once so verinoda is on PATH. [precise] adds the optional precise call-site resolver (jedi); leave it out for a smaller install. Upgrade with uv tool upgrade verinoda, pipx upgrade verinoda or pip install -U verinoda. Releases are published from tags by .github/workflows/release.yml (docs/RELEASING.md). MCP clients that start servers with npx can use npx -y verinoda mcp serve; verinoda setup registers the installed command instead.

The development version (main), straight from GitHub:

# Windows (PowerShell or cmd)
uv tool install --force --reinstall-package verinoda --link-mode copy "verinoda[precise] @ https://github.com/ozcinax-star/verinoda/archive/main.zip"
# macOS / Linux (or Git Bash on Windows)
curl -LsSf https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ozcinax-star/verinoda/main/install.sh | sh

Both development-version commands install from the GitHub archive with the optional precise resolver and copy files instead of hardlinking them (so sandboxed agents such as Codex can import the package). Run the same uv tool install ... line, or the script, again to upgrade. The script (install.sh, read it first) installs uv if it is missing, runs that command and uv tool update-shell; options are environment variables: VERINODA_REF (branch, tag or commit; default main), VERINODA_EXTRAS (none to skip the precise extra), VERINODA_NO_MODIFY_PATH=1.

Why there is no irm ... | iex one-liner for Windows: Microsoft Defender blocked powershell -ExecutionPolicy ByPass -c "irm <script url> | iex" for this project's script as Trojan:Win32/Commando.A!ml, a machine-learning verdict on that download-and-run command line (the script file itself was not flagged). The plain uv commands above avoid the pattern.

Then, once per project:

cd my-project
verinoda setup        # index the code + connect Claude Code / Codex if they are installed

verinoda setup is safe to re-run (it updates the index and leaves unchanged skills alone). --agents claude,codex|all|none, --scope user for all projects, --no-mcp. It ends with a first question about the project, built from its most connected function or class, and how to open the graph.

Or skip it and just ask: in a git work tree without an index, the first verinoda query, analyze, trace, map or ui indexes the project once and says so on stderr (never outside a git work tree or in the home folder; VERINODA_NO_AUTO_INDEX=1 turns it off):

cd my-project
verinoda query "where is the discount threshold configured?"   # indexes first, then answers

Other ways to install

Python 3.10+ (3.12+ recommended: the runtime tracer uses sys.monitoring). Graphify (graphifyy) is not required; the extractor is part of this package.

# from a checkout or a wheel you built (uv build)
uv tool install --link-mode copy .                                   # or a wheel path
pipx install ./dist/verinoda-*-py3-none-any.whl
pip install ./dist/verinoda-*-py3-none-any.whl                      # into an existing venv

# optional: precise call-site resolution (jedi)
uv tool install --link-mode copy --with "jedi>=0.19.2,<0.21" .
pip install ".[precise]"

verinoda --version
verinoda doctor

Build the wheel with uv build --wheel (or python -m build --wheel).

Codex on Windows: use --link-mode copy. With uv's default link mode the installed package files are hardlinks into uv's cache. Codex's workspace-write sandbox on Windows could not read them (PermissionError), so the verinoda CLI failed inside Codex while the MCP tools still worked (docs/AGENT-VERIFICATION.md). uv tool install --link-mode copy … (or UV_LINK_MODE=copy) avoids this. verinoda doctor warns when the install is hardlinked or editable (sandbox_readable). On such an install the Codex MCP entry is registered with --profile full: the Codex sandbox may not import the package, MCP is then the way in, and it must serve every tool the skill uses. Reinstall in copy mode and run install again to get the default (core) entry.

Related MCP server: DevTime MCP Server

Quick start

cd my-project
verinoda setup                           # once: index + agent skills (or `verinoda scan .` for the index only)
verinoda map . --view dataflow           # entry points -> persistence, with limits stated
verinoda map . --view dead               # code nothing the project starts from reaches, as claims
verinoda map . --view hotspots           # files and functions that change often and are complex
verinoda map . --view sides              # Minecraft: client-only code reachable from server code, with the path
verinoda map . --view repo --max-tokens 2000   # the files to read first and their signatures
verinoda ui                              # notes + graph in the browser (local)
verinoda ui --graph                      # ... opened straight on the graph view
verinoda ui --watch                      # ... and kept up to date while you edit
verinoda ui --export --open              # the graph + file notes as one HTML file, no server
verinoda notes --changed                 # your own notes whose code changed since you wrote them
verinoda query "where is the discount threshold configured?"     # plain-text context
verinoda query "retry path:src/** lang:kt NOT is:vendored"      # filters narrow the ranked results
verinoda trace create_order_handler OrderRepository.save
verinoda when RepairScheduler.tick      # when it runs: the event or caller, the conditions on the way
verinoda plan draft "Sipariş API'den veritabanına nasıl ulaşıyor?"   # -> .verinoda/plans/plan-001.json
verinoda plan check plan-001.json        # grounds every mention; 0 ready, 2 invalid, 3 needs clarification
verinoda analyze --plan plan-001.json    # or: verinoda analyze "How does an order reach the database?"
verinoda resolve "compare with requests 2.31 sessions.py"        # pin the references first
verinoda observe --for apply_discount    # which tests reach it at runtime (isolated copy)
verinoda resolve-call orders/service.py:22 save                  # precise extra: which definition?
verinoda claim show clm_…                # evidence (with grades), uncertainties, full history
verinoda challenge clm_…                 # adversarial re-check; can only lower confidence
verinoda update .                        # after edits: re-index changed files, mark affected claims stale
verinoda verify clm_…                    # re-check evidence (moved lines are relocated)

Try it on the bundled example: copy examples/orders_app somewhere, git init and commit it, then run the commands above inside the copy. For observe, give the copy a .venv with pytest installed.

Commands

Command

What it does

doctor [--brief]

Python, package layout, upstream base, graph/snapshot freshness, schema, claim counts, search index, lexicon, precise/SCIP availability, sys.monitoring, reference network mode, agent skills, MCP config, optional deps; secrets shown only as set/unset; --brief prints only the graph and snapshot lines and every failed or warning check

setup [path] [--agents auto|all|none|claude,codex] [--scope project|user] [--no-mcp] [--hooks] [--reference PATH[=ALIAS,...]]

One step per project, safe to re-run: init, scan on the first run and update afterwards, then skills + MCP for the agents found on PATH (default auto); prints what is left to do by hand. --reference marks a folder of reference code (an original being ported, a vendored or frozen copy) that ranks below the project's own code unless a question names it or an alias (repeatable). Setup also points out folders that look like such a copy (most of their code files sit at the same relative path under a larger folder and hold mostly the same lines) and prints the --reference command; it never applies it. Refuses the home directory unless --allow-home

init [path]

Create .verinoda/ (database, config)

trust [path] [--subfolders] [--remove] [--list] [--yes]

Trust a project (recorded outside it): only then do its tests run with process isolation, and only then does its own .verinoda/config.json set experiments.*, mcp.profile and research.network. Your decision: it asks to confirm, and without a terminal needs --yes; an agent never runs it for you

scan <repo> [--force] [--precise] [--scip FILE] / update <repo> [--fast] [--consolidate]

Full / incremental index + snapshot, then the derived search index, lexicon and symbol facts; update marks claims whose dependencies changed stale; --fast takes the changed files in at once and rebuilds the graph in the background (D44). --precise resolves the call sites of changed .py files; --scip adopts a SCIP index you produced. --repo R works for both as for query; update without a path takes the nearest project. update --consolidate (or claims.consolidate_on_update: true in .verinoda/config.json, which the git hooks' updates honour too) then re-verifies up to 20 stale claims within 20 s and counts duplicates, never merging; skipped while --fast rebuilds the graph in the background

consolidate [--limit N] [--budget S] [--merge] [--dry-run]

Between sessions: re-verifies stale claims with verify on the current tree (static: no test is run), so one whose code came back is restored and rebound; claims never tried come first, then the one tried longest ago, so every stale claim is reached over a few runs; the budget includes an index refresh and no verify waits for another build. Lists the claims that state the same thing (the same claim key: kind, spec, subjects or normalised text, in the same project and valid_env) among claims neither stale nor contradicted, and reports as a conflict a statement that is contradicted in one claim and not in another (never merged); --merge keeps the one with the best status (then the latest verification) and folds each other one into it in one transaction: its supporting and qualifying evidence linked to the kept claim (not its refuting evidence; the kept claim's status unchanged until its next verify), the duplicate marked duplicate_of in its spec and its history. --merge is not bounded by --limit or --budget. Nothing is deleted. Exit 1 when a claim could not be processed

notes [<repo>] [--changed] [--keep SUBJECT] [--delete SUBJECT] [--facts [--category C] [--tag T]] [--links]

Your own notes on the code (written in verinoda ui) with their status: fresh, changed (the code was edited since) or gone; --changed lists only those and exits 1 when there are any (for CI); --keep anchors a note you read again to the code as it is now; --delete removes one; --facts lists the - [category] fact #tag lines of your notes (Basic Memory's form: what you wrote, not claims, so no evidence status) with their note and line, --category / --tag filter them; --links resolves every [[Name]] (a note of yours, a file::Name subject, a name or a file in the index) and exits 1 when one leads nowhere, 3 when one could not be checked (no index, or the file it found changed since). The note files are read on every call: an edit in your editor is what the next command sees

ui [<repo>] [--repo DIR] [--port N] [--no-browser] [--graph] [--read-only] [--watch] [--export [FILE] [--open]]

notes and graph of the project in the browser: a note per symbol, file and data file, local and global graphs, search (see Notes and graph view); --graph opens on the graph view; --watch runs verinoda update when files change; --export writes the graph and the file notes as one HTML file that opens without a server (--open opens it)

export [--format graphml|cypher|obsidian|svg] [--out PATH]

The graph for other tools: GraphML (Gephi, yEd, Cytoscape), Neo4j Cypher (cypher-shell <; re-importing adds nothing), an Obsidian vault (a note per source file with wikilinks; a non-empty folder it did not write is refused) or an SVG of the 300 most linked files. Every edge carries its relation, confidence, file:line and the status it can carry unchecked (strong_inference EXTRACTED, weak_inference inferred, unknown without a line); what changed since the index, and every edge into it, is marked stale; no code, no machine paths; an existing --out file it did not write is refused. Default .verinoda/index/export/; exit 2 when it cannot be written

map [<repo>] [--repo DIR] [--view …] [--max-lines N] [--max-tokens N]

hierarchy, dependencies, dataflow, config, tests, history, impact (--target, default: git changes; also the files that changed together with the change in the last 1,000 commits and that no graph edge links to it, each a strong_inference claim with its commit count and the shared commits as evidence), cycles (dependency cycles between files, each with the fewest file dependencies to cut and the cycle each cut closes, at file:line), dead (code files, classes, functions and methods no entry point, test or entry module reaches; each a strong_inference claim at most, weak_inference when a dynamic use could keep it alive, naming the entry points searched), hotspots (code files ranked by changes x complexity: the non-merge commits of the last 1,000 that touched the file times the sum of its functions' cyclomatic complexity; then the functions of the top 20 files by their own changes, each commit's changed lines carried through later diffs to the current text, times their cyclomatic complexity; counts and complexity at file:line, the ranking strong_inference), sides (Minecraft: client-only code - the src/client source set, @Environment(EnvType.CLIENT) / @OnlyIn(Dist.CLIENT) classes and methods, net.minecraft.client classes - reachable from the server-side entry points; each path a strong_inference claim at most, weak_inference through an inferred edge, with every hop at file:line and the line that makes the target client-only), repo (a repo map: files ranked by PageRank over the dependencies view's file edges, the random jump weighted toward the files in play - --target, default the git changes, themselves left out - and the first line of each class, function and method at file:line, the best ranked first, until --max-tokens (default 1024, four characters a token); the ranking strong_inference). dead, hotspots, sides and repo are asked for by name. Text output is a summary per view (counts, the largest folders and packages, the heaviest dependencies, what was left out) instead of a JSON dump; --json has everything. The config view also lists .yml/.toml config files that are not graph nodes. An impact --target that does not name one symbol exactly is listed with its candidates (resolution) and the command exits 2; so does a repo --target that is no file of the graph

map save NAME [--trace <a> <b> [--mode flow|any] | --view …] / map show NAME / map list

A trace (as trace) or map views (as map --json) kept under a name in .verinoda/maps/NAME.json with the index snapshot and commit they came from and the hash the snapshot recorded for each file they cite; saving again replaces it. show hashes those files again: current (exit 0) when each is as it was, stale (exit 1) when one changed or is gone - named, the saved result shown as it was then, with the command that makes it again; unknown (exit 1) when it cites no file; a file the map does not cite is not checked. An unresolved trace or target is not saved (exit 2). .verinoda is git-ignored: share a map with git add -f .verinoda/maps/NAME.json. MCP: map_view with view: saved, targets: [NAME] (none: the list)

query "<q>" [--max-items N] [--max-chars N]

Bounded retrieval from the passage index; plain text for a model by default (skeleton first, each item with why it was chosen; nothing printed twice: no question echo, a signature once, windows dedented), --json for programs. Says "N file(s) changed since the index" with the list, and "not in the index yet" for a code name only a changed file spells. Filters in the question narrow the ranked results: path:GLOB, lang:NAME, symbol:NAME, is:vendored|generated|minified|test, /regex/ (the matching line is the evidence), joined by AND, OR, NOT (or -) and parentheses; a question of filters only lists every matching unit; project_query reads the same syntax

trace <a> <b> [--mode flow|any]

Directed paths, each hop with relation, confidence and call-site location; hints when an endpoint does not resolve; an endpoint that names several symbols is listed (ambiguous), none picked; a resolved: line names the node each endpoint resolved to; exit 2 when an endpoint does not resolve or is ambiguous, or there is no path

when <symbol> [--depth N]

When a method runs: paths back through its callers to the event or scheduler that starts it (JVM registrations and lambdas: "at the end of every server tick", "80 ticks later"), each call with the conditions around it as written and its file:line; exit 2 when the name does not resolve (candidates listed)

butterfly <symbol> [--mode calls|inherits] [--depth N] [--no-tests]

One symbol with its callers and callees as two trees, or, for a type (the default for a class), what it extends and implements and what extends or implements it; each link with the file:line it is written on, its confidence and a claim whose status is strong_inference (EXTRACTED) or weak_inference (INFERRED), never verified; a method is named Class.method; a node already on a side is not repeated (a direct recursive call is listed once, marked); a side says what it left out (test code, code outside the project); the name is resolved as trace resolves it (candidates listed, none picked; exit 2). The ui Butterfly panel shows the same

extract <path:LINE|path#Symbol ...> [--from FILE|-]

The whole function or class around a location, with its lines (a top-level statement or a Markdown section when there is no definition): path:LINE, path:LINE-LINE, path#Symbol, or the locations in a compiler's, linter's or test run's output (Python tracebacks, path:LINE:COL, path(LINE,COL), Maven's path:[LINE,COL], JVM frames by package path); the file is parsed as it is now, no index needed; each definition is a claim with its lines as evidence (strong_inference when the parser had to recover from syntax errors); exit 2 when a location is not found

history text "<text>" [--regex] [--path P] / history symbol NAME|path:A-B [--limit N] / history commits [--message RE] [--author RE] [--path P] [--since DATE] [--until DATE] [--diff RE] [--limit N] / history compare BASE [HEAD] [--path P]

Git history, read only. symbol: the commits whose diffs changed a symbol's lines (git log -L from HEAD; working-tree lines that differ from HEAD are mapped to HEAD's first), newest first, each a history claim quoting the commit message, subject and body without the trailer block; a name that does not resolve to one symbol gets its candidates, never a similar name. text: the commit that first added a text (git log -S; with --regex, -G over the added and removed lines) and, when HEAD has none, the commit that last removed it, each a history claim whose evidence is the commit with the diff line and its file:line (strong_inference for the first appearance in a shallow clone or a history cut at 200 commits), then every commit that added or removed it and where it is at HEAD. commits: commits by message, author, path, date and diff content (regular expressions, case ignored), newest first, with the files each changed. compare: what HEAD (or another revision) has that BASE has not: the commits, the merge base, the files changed with line counts; exit 2 when nothing is found

docs check [PATHS] [--fix] [--exclude GLOB]

Code references in the repository's own Markdown, reStructuredText and AsciiDoc files checked against the working tree: Markdown link targets and inline code spans that read as paths, with path:12-30 or path#L12-L30 lines. A missing path is broken; a path git recorded as renamed is renamed; cited lines that only moved since the document's last commit are moved, lines that changed are changed. --fix rewrites renamed paths and moved line numbers in place (the reference's own characters only). Paths whose first folder is not in the repository (another project's example) and ignored paths are counted as not checked. Exit 1 while anything is broken, renamed, moved or changed (a CI check)

spec check [--specs-dir DIR] [--json]

Requirement criteria traced to their evidence. A spec is a Markdown file in the specs folder (.verinoda/specs/; commit one for CI with [specs] dir = "docs/specs" in verinoda.toml or [tool.verinoda.specs] dir in pyproject.toml; specs.dir in .verinoda/config.json and --specs-dir take precedence; a setting file that cannot be read is an error, never the default). Dot folders, vendored folders and links or junctions under it are not read. A criterion is a line starting with an id in brackets, best in the EARS style (- [CART-1] WHEN the cart is empty THE SYSTEM SHALL refuse checkout); fenced and indented code, HTML comments and link reference definitions are skipped. The evidence: lines under it name what backs it: claim ids, test ids (tests/test_cart.py::test_empty; a Python test* function or method, not a fixture or helper; a JS/TS it/test title), path::Name, path:12-30. Nothing is matched by text: each criterion is verified (a verified claim whose cited file lines still hold the recorded content), tested (the test is defined), tested_inferred (a JS/TS test found by its title, a text pattern), broken (a reference that no longer resolves, a stale or contradicted claim, or one whose cited lines changed), unchecked (no Verinoda state, or one this version cannot read: the store is opened read-only, only when a claim is cited) or unevidenced (no reference, only code pointers or inference claims). Lists every criterion with its spec file:line, each reference's line and a claim's evidence, the limits and the index age; a SHALL line with no id, an evidence line with no criterion, an empty evidence line and two criteria with one id are problems. Exit 0 (ok, no_criteria, or no_specs when the default folder does not exist), 1 while a criterion is broken or unevidenced or a spec line has a problem (failed, or unevidenced when that is the only cause), 3 when something was not checked (a claim not read, a spec file not read, a configured folder that does not exist), 2 on an error (a folder outside the repository, a setting that cannot be read)

hooks install [--dry-run] [--print] / hooks uninstall [--gone] [--dry-run] / hooks status

Git hooks that keep the index current: post-commit (not during a rebase), post-checkout (a branch switch only), post-merge and post-rewrite (the end of a rebase or an amend) start <python> -P -m verinoda update <project> in the background, detached, so git is never held up; only for a git command in the project's own work tree (worktrees share hooks) and while the project has its .verinoda/ folder (VERINODA_NO_HOOK=1 skips it once). -P keeps the work tree off sys.path: a project's own verinoda/ folder never runs. A marked block per project goes right after the hook's #! line; an existing hook is kept and restored byte for byte, one that is not a shell script, a symbolic link or a block edited by hand is left alone, and when core.hooksPath points to another tool's folder nothing is written or removed (exit 2; --print shows the lines). status also lists other projects' blocks and those whose folder is gone; uninstall --gone removes those. setup --hooks installs them too. No merge driver: the graph is in .verinoda/, which git ignores

infra [--file FILE]

Infrastructure as code linked to the code it runs: every Dockerfile (its last stage's ENTRYPOINT + CMD), compose service (command/entrypoint over the Dockerfile it builds), Kubernetes container (command/args, over the project Dockerfile whose image name it uses) and Terraform resource/data block, read as text (docker, kubectl and terraform are never run). Each command is statically_verified at its manifest line; the project file it runs (python -m pkg.mod, uvicorn pkg.mod:app, node file.js, java -jar, sh -c chains, scripts; a Terraform path or Lambda handler) is linked with the manifest line and the COPY lines that put it in the image as evidence: strong_inference through COPY or a code attribute (source_dir, filename) of a Terraform function, archive or container, weak_inference when found by its path's ending, through an image matched by name, a path another Terraform attribute only names, or a jar linked to the build file that makes it. Installed programs (nginx) are listed without a link. --file keeps the nodes that run (or name) one file (exit 2 when it is not a project file). --json for programs. Exit 1 when nothing is found

context FILE

What the project says about one file: the enforced decision records whose accepted guards name it in a glob (only_in, no_edge, layers, allow_edges, public; tag:NAME read as its globs) or that govern a symbol in it, your own notes on it, notes scoped to a glob (scope: GLOB in a note's header), and the Cursor (.cursor/rules/*.mdc globs:) and Kiro (.kiro/steering/*.md fileMatchPattern:) rules for it, each quoted with where it is written. The Read/Edit hook template (MCP read_context, behind run_tool) shows the same to an agent that opens the file

tour SOURCE TARGET [--mode flow|any] [--title T] [--out FILE] [--force] / tour --check FILE [--fix]

A CodeTour file (.tours/<title>.tour, opened by the VS Code CodeTour extension) from the first trace path: a step at the source's definition, at each hop's site and at the target's definition, each quoting its line and saying the graph edge and its confidence (a lead to read, not a verified fact), pinned to the commit (ref). --check finds each step's line again by its text and says which moved and which are gone (exit 1); --fix writes the moved lines back. A tour Verinoda did not write is never overwritten

rules [--base REV | --staged]

Path-scoped review rules. AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, BUGBOT.md and REVIEW.md in any folder (and .cursor/BUGBOT.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md) cover their folder and everything under it. Lines MODE ID: regex|ast PATTERN [-- MESSAGE] in a fenced verinoda-rules block (MODE error, warning or off; a nearer file's rule with the same id replaces a farther one) are checked on the lines the change added (git grep -E, or a grep-ast pattern), each match statically_verified at its file:line with the rule's own line; the prose rule files covering each changed file are listed to read, not judged. Exit 1 on an error rule's match, 3 when a search did not finish or the change weakens a rule in force at the base (removed, turned down, rewritten; rule files themselves are not checked). review carries the counts, the first matches, the weakened rules and the rule files to read

monitor [check | add ID --regex RE|--ast PATTERN [--lang L] [--path P] [--message M] | accept ID | remove ID | trend ID [--points N]]

Saved searches that must not gain matches, kept in the committed verinoda-monitors.json with the matches they had when added (the baseline). check (the default) exits 1 on a match the baseline does not have (each at its file:line), lists the ones gone (a migration's progress) and exits 3 when a search did not finish (a cut list, a timeout, a skipped file, a path gone, a git error); matches are keyed by file and line text, so moved lines are not new. --regex is git's extended regex run by git grep -E; --ast is a grep-ast pattern; --path (relative to the current folder, read literally) limits both; the monitors file itself is never searched. accept takes the current matches as the baseline; trend counts a regex monitor's matches at commits spread over the history

owners [TARGET] [--days N] [--max-files N]

Who knows this code, read only. TARGET is a file, a folder, path:A-B or path#Symbol (default: the whole project). CODEOWNERS (the first of .github/CODEOWNERS, CODEOWNERS, docs/CODEOWNERS, .gitlab/CODEOWNERS, resolved as GitHub does: the last matching rule wins): one claim per rule that owns files of the target, citing the rule's line (statically_verified; strong_inference with GitLab sections). git blame -w over the file as it is on disk: the authors with their share of the lines, the main author, the bus factor (the fewest authors holding more than half of the lines) and the knowledge loss (lines of authors with no commit in the --days before HEAD's date, default 365), each a strong_inference claim whose evidence is the blame at HEAD; lines not committed yet are credited to nobody; a folder is blamed file by file (text files git tracks, at most --max-files, default 200). Exit 2 when nothing is found

diagram architecture|flow|sequence [<a>] [<b>] [--mode flow|any]

A Mermaid diagram with its evidence as %% comments: the parts of the project and the edges between them, the call paths of trace from a to b (or what a calls, two calls deep), or the first of them as a sequence of messages between the classes or files that own each method. Every arrow is a claim with file:line; an arrow drawn only from inferred edges is dashed and weak_inference; exit 2 when an endpoint does not resolve

wiki [--markdown] [--page ID]

The wiki outline: an overview page with the architecture diagram and a page per folder, or the pages a committed .verinoda-wiki.json names (title, purpose, parent, paths, flows); --markdown prints every page with its Mermaid diagrams and evidence; what the file names that the index does not have is listed as a problem. The MCP reaches it as map_view view outline; ui --export carries it

grep-ast [PATTERN] [PATH ...] [--lang L] [--rule FILE] [--max-results N]

Structural search: a code-shaped pattern such as foo($A, $$$REST) parsed with each language's tree-sitter grammar (Python, Java, TypeScript/JavaScript and the other languages the index reads) and matched on the trees of the project's files: $A is one node (the same name twice must match the same text, $_ captures nothing), $$$REST zero or more; commas (except one marking a hole, as in [1, , 2]), semicolons and comments are not compared. $NAME is a metavariable everywhere, inside string literals too, with no escape (a literal $_GET cannot be searched); --lang typescript includes .tsx files. Each match is statically_verified (the matched text is in the file, read from disk) with its file:line, the text and the captures; shape only, names are not resolved. A language whose grammar cannot parse the pattern is named, not searched; each file has a time bound (files past it are named). --rule reads YAML rule files (id, language, pattern or rule: {pattern: ...}, message; one rule per document; other keys that would change the matches, such as not, inside or constraints, are refused). --json for programs. Exit 1 when nothing matches, 2 on a bad pattern or rule file

rename-preview <symbol> <new_name> [--max-sites N]

Every line a rename of one symbol would touch, without editing: the definition, the calls, imports and references the index ties to it (a call graded as analyze grades it: statically_verified only for an EXTRACTED edge whose Python line calls it), lines bound by place (another call in a caller the index ties to it, a file that imports it by this name, its own module or class) and the overrides and overloads renamed with a method, each with its status, why and the line; then the mentions (weak_inference: a comment, a string, a document, reflection, or a line only a guessed INFERRED edge ties to it), other symbols of the same name (left alone), edge lines that do not spell the name (a call through an import alias), and conflicts with the new name (already defined in the same scope, or already spelled in a file the rename edits). Writes nothing, records no claim. --json for programs. Exit 2 when the symbol does not resolve or the new name is not an identifier, 3 on a conflict

what-if --move OLD=NEW [--move ...] [--decisions-dir DIR]

Simulate moving or renaming files and folders without editing: the graph's file paths are relabelled in memory, then the edge guards of the decision records (no_edge, layers, allow_edges, public) and the dependency cycles are computed on the new paths and compared with the current ones. Lists the findings the move would add or remove (each as decide check reports it, with the line where the code is now; an added one is strong_inference at most, since it holds only if the move updates the imports), the checks it would leave unable to run (a glob that would match no file; their guard's findings are counted as not re-checked, not removed), and the cycles it would create, break or change (grow, join, shrink; only a merge, --move a.py=b.py onto an existing file, changes them). NEW/, . or an existing folder moves a file or folder into it, as git mv does. Assumes the code naming a moved file is updated with it; other guard kinds are not re-checked. --json for programs. Exit 3 when the move adds a finding, a cycle or an unchecked guard, 2 on a bad move

backlog <item|file:LINE|symbol>

A numbered backlog item (docs/BACKLOG.md rows and headings) with every code comment that cites it, or the items that explain a line or a symbol: the comments on and above it and the declaration comments of the fields it uses, with the part of the item about that code; exit 2 when nothing matches

rationale [symbol|path] [--limit N]

The comments that say why: WHY:, NOTE:, NB:, HACK:, IMPORTANT:, RATIONALE: (any case, with the comment lines that follow) and comments citing a decision record (ADR-12, docs/adr/..., DESIGN.md D50, "decision record"), quoted with their file:line and attached to the definition they sit directly above (decorators and annotations may come between) or in, else to the module; for a symbol, a file, a folder or the project. Each is statically_verified that the comment is there; what it says is its author's statement, not checked; the definition it explains is strong_inference (attach_status). Read from the files as they are (nothing is added to the index); MCP node_inspect quotes the ones of the node (rationale, at most 5). Exit 2 when there is none, the name does not resolve or its file changed since the index (stale)

agent-lint [--file PATH] [--no-memory] [--all]

AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, Copilot, Cursor, Windsurf and Cline rules and Claude Code's memory for the project, checked against the tree line by line: paths exist (with the case as written; a file:LINE within the file), npm/pnpm/yarn scripts, make and just targets, python -m modules, installed packages, extras and tools run by name are declared, and two files agree on the test/lint/format/typecheck/build commands and the package manager (against the lock file). Each check has a verdict (ok, wrong, unknown), a status and file:line evidence, with the nearest names for a wrong path; a missing git-ignored path is unknown. Exit 3 when something is wrong, 2 when there is no instruction file.

brief [--max-chars N]

The project brief, not the decision brief (decide brief): a short summary built again from the files on every call, each line with the file:line it was read from (a folder's file count cites the folder): name, version and runtime (pyproject.toml, package.json), console scripts and bin, the build backend, the package.json scripts, Makefile targets and justfile recipes named build/test/lint/format/typecheck, pytest settings, the commands CI runs (.github/workflows run:, .gitlab-ci.yml script:; test commands first), the top-level folders (what a manifest says each is, then file counts and main extensions) and conventions (.editorconfig, .gitattributes, line-length, strict modes, pre-commit hooks, agent instruction files). Cut to --max-chars (default 2,000; 200-20,000): the first two lines of each section, then the rest, CI last; the lines left out, and the CI commands past the first 10, are counted. Exit 2 when nothing was found.

datapack [tag|score|team|bossbar|function NAME | packs] [--with PATH]

Minecraft datapacks: entity tags checked but never added, tags added but never checked, objectives written but never read, objectives, teams and boss bars used but never declared (scoreboard objectives add, team add, bossbar add, Java addObjective / addPlayerTeam; each with its sites, strong_inference; a name Java declares by a built string marks it "maybe declared by" that line), names that break the rules set in datapack.naming of .verinoda/config.json (a regex per kind: objective, team, bossbar, tag, function; none by default), calls to missing functions (mcfunction and Java together), resource files two packs or mods ship with different bytes (both files listed; merged files such as tags without replace and lang files left out) and mod dependencies not met (a required mod missing, a version outside the declared range, a mod another declares it breaks; --with adds a mod jar, a datapack or a mods folder to the set, without it a dependency the repository lacks is listed as not checked); packs lists the packs and mods found with the same checks; or every site of one tag, objective, team, boss bar or function (an objective, team or boss bar says whether anything declares it; a function's callers include Java: command strings, getFunctions().get(...) of an identifier, and the project's helpers around it, recognised by their body; names Java builds at run time are listed as dynamic; a Java tag constant is the one Java binds, c ? A : B adds both, entityTags().add(...) is an add, and a tag name built at run time (a.tag + "_at") marks a checked tag "maybe added by" that line); exit 2 when nothing matches. The functions are in the graph too, so when, trace and impact follow function and schedule calls, and the Java calls into them (D71); a function id with a folder (ns:dir/name) names the function

trace-log FILE [--no-store]

The stack traces and GameTest results of a log: the project's frames mapped to methods with their callers, the game's folded, a trace through a test's succeed/fail tied to that test; a known crash pattern (out of memory, the watchdog, a missing dependency or class, a Mixin that failed to apply, the wrong Java) named with its log line, and the mods its frames point at scored by their frames' positions (strong_inference, the inputs shown); stored as claims whose evidence is the log (it observes, never verifies). A Sentry event export (exception.values[].stacktrace.frames) or an OpenTelemetry trace in OTLP JSON (code.* span attributes, exception.stacktrace), read from the local file only: each frame mapped onto the repository by path suffix (several matching files named, none picked), its line checked against the current file and the definition the index puts there; a mapped frame is observed for that event only (not_checked names a source line or function name it was not compared on), a stale one says why (file missing, line beyond the end, another function at that line), frames the export marks as a library's (or a site-packages-style path it does not mark its own) folded, others of unknown origin reported as not in the repository. A file is read as an export when it parses as JSON (or JSON lines, where most lines parse or only a cut last line fails) and holds an event or span; a .json / .jsonl / .ndjson file that does not parse, is over 32 MB or holds neither is refused (exit 1), any other file is read as a log. At most 200 events, the innermost 200 frames of each and 50 stored claims a run (an export imported again adds none); --json has mode (export or log) and a claims_note (a stored claim never verifies: in practice weak_inference). Exit 0 when something was read, 2 when a log had nothing to map

secret-scan [FILE ...] [--fix]

Secrets (token formats, key blocks, password= values, this environment's secret variables) and e-mail addresses left in files; by default the run logs and copied logs under .verinoda/ and the ui --export file, which Verinoda already writes redacted. Each finding is file:line with its rule (strong_inference: a pattern), never the value; --fix redacts in place keeping line numbers; exit 1 on a finding

shader [FIELD] [--check [--glslang]] [--includes]

Where a GLSL uniform block field (Weather.y) is filled in Java, from the block's field order and the writer's put... calls; --check: blocks and writers or mirrored constant tables that disagree, and shader lint with lines: #include / #moj_import missing or in a cycle, brackets or #if/#endif that do not balance, #version out of place, a standard Iris/OptiFine uniform used undeclared or a macro tested but never defined (exit 3); --glslang: also compile each pack stage with glslangValidator when installed (off by default); --includes: the include edges with their lines

lang [--default LOCALE] [--no-unused]

Minecraft translation keys: keys missing from a locale or only in it, written twice, placeholders that differ from the default locale (en_us), keys the code asks for that no lang file defines, keys nothing names; each finding cites both files (exit 3)

access-check [FILE ...]

Access wideners and access transformers against the class files of the build's classpath (code_check.classpath or the one a Loom build resolved): every entry with its path:line, exists (with jar!class as evidence), absent (a member missing from a class file read, with the nearest real names or its real descriptors; a class on no jar of a complete classpath), malformed (an unknown access, a wrong word count, a dotted class in a widener, a bad descriptor, no header) or unknown (an incomplete classpath, a JDK or project class, a widener in another namespace than named, an SRG name). Exit 3: absent or malformed; 4: something unknown; 2: no file

plan draft|check|schema|audit

Question plans: draft from the message (TR/EN rules), check and ground a plan file, print the schema, re-judge an analysis' sub-questions later

analyze ["<q>"] [--plan FILE] [--run-tests] [--observe] [--refresh auto|inline|skip]

Budgeted loop per sub-question → claims + evidence + critique + unknowns, each sub-question judged against its done_when. The default output is the text a model reads: the snapshot, how the question was understood, where its words resolved in the code (plan links:), one block per sub-question with its verdict, answer claims and unknowns, the other claims, then the passages verinoda query gives; --json prints the full record (steps, usage, every field). The index refresh that runs first is not charged to the budget: auto skips a slow one on a big project and names the changed files, inline always refreshes (waiting for a build already running), skip never does

claim show|list|add

Inspect claims, or record one with source evidence (--kind location|relation|config|order --symbol X for a mechanical grade; definitive misses are contradicted when the claim is created)

claim asof --time WHEN | --commit REV [--status S]

Claims in time. --time (an ISO date or time): each claim's status as Verinoda had recorded it then, read back from the append-only history (observed). --commit: which claims held at that commit, from a transition recorded at the revision (observed), else at the nearest commits with a record in its history (carried over: strong_inference), else no record. Every transition now records the snapshot whose tree it read (none for the working tree; a dirty snapshot is at no commit)

verify <id> [--run]

Re-check evidence against the current tree (anchored relocation; optionally re-run its test)

challenge <id>

Critique and counter-hypothesis probes; lowers status/confidence when support is weak

resolve "<text>" [--reference URL[@ref]] [--network off|cache|on] [--local-intent]

Pin every reference in a message to the exact version meant; reports mismatches and questions for the user

research <url-or-repo> [--ref] [--topic] [--resolution ID --reference-id rN]

Reference repo pinned to an exact commit (or the pin from resolve), or a document; mechanism trace

compare <local> <reference> --topic …

Assumption diff: data structures, errors, concurrency, environment, dependencies

feedback add|process|resolve|show|list

User critique handled as a hypothesis → confirmed / qualified / corrected / unresolved (references resolved first)

experiment run --hypothesis … [--ref REF [--overlay PATH]] -- <cmd>

Isolated targeted experiment on a copy of the working tree, or with --ref of one commit (the working tree and .git untouched; --overlay lays working-tree files over it); logs on disk, summary + evidence + the tree hash of what ran recorded; refused when policy does not allow it

decide brief|answer|record|import|guard|accept|waive|supersede|link|toc|list|check|baseline|ask|undocumented|dismiss

Decisions stay human (D33). brief "<question>": the code's side of a should/which/scale question and at most 5 questions only the user can answer, never a recommendation (--argument "NAME: text" shows the agent's own argument under an option, as weak_inference). answer <brief-id> --q qN: the user's answer. record: the user's explicit choice as a Markdown decision record with guards, governed symbols and revisit conditions (the decisions folder: --decisions-dir, decisions.dir in .verinoda/config.json, [decisions] dir in verinoda.toml or [tool.verinoda.decisions] dir in pyproject.toml, default .verinoda/decisions/); import a hand-written ADR (guards only proposed); guard / accept / waive / list. supersede OLD --by NEW: the old record becomes superseded and both records name each other; link ADR-N KIND ADR-M (amends, clarifies, depends-on, relates-to) also writes the reverse link on the other record; toc [--write FILE.md]: the records by date with their relations, as a Markdown table and a Mermaid graph (--json: the timeline; verinoda ui shows it at #/d); a relation only one record states is a warning, not a problem. check [--changed | --base REF] [--decisions-dir DIR]: VIOLATED / POSSIBLE / REVIEW / TRIGGER, ok with scope and limits; exit 1 on VIOLATED, 3 when something could not be checked (status unknown), 2 on an error or when a running index build or a failed refresh left edge guards unchecked (it waits up to 120 s for a build already running). Architecture rules (D95) are guards over graph edges, each violation at the edge's cited line: layers order=src/ui/**,src/core/**,src/db/** (top first: no edge from a lower layer up), allow_edges from=GLOB allowed=GLOB,... (those files use only each other and the allowed ones), public module=GLOB api=GLOB,... (outside code reaches the module only through its api files); a glob may be tag:NAME from [architecture.tags] in verinoda.toml (or [tool.verinoda.architecture.tags] in pyproject.toml). baseline [--record --said "..." [--replace] | --shrink]: known violations check does not fail on, in baseline.json next to the records (committed); each site keyed by its decision, guard, file and code line text, so a moved line keeps its entry and a changed one is new; check lists them as baselined (still violations) and the entries it no longer finds as fixed; --record needs the user's words and grows an existing baseline only with --replace; --shrink removes fixed entries and never adds. undocumented: structural choices no decision record covers - one file holding every storage sink line of a kind, a declared Python dependency imported by one product file, one file reading the whole environment - each a weak_inference candidate over a statically_verified fact with path:line evidence, with the guard spec that would keep it and the record command; a live record or ADR that names the file or library covers it. dismiss CANDIDATE --reason "..." (the user's call; --undo lists it again): kept in .verinoda/dismissed_decisions.json, not committed. ask SOURCE TARGET: before a dependency is written, whether SOURCE (a project file, new or not) may depend on TARGET (a project file, a Python module that names one, or a package) under the accepted guards: forbidden (an edge rule or dependency absent= forbids it), restricted (an only_in rule keeps calls through it to other files), allowed (no accepted rule forbids it) or unknown (an undefined tag, an unreadable record, no accepted guard), each rule that applies cited at its record line; it reads the records, never the code or the graph; exit 1 forbidden, 3 unknown; MCP dependency_ask

debug start "<symptom>" [--base REF] [--trace] -- <repro> / debug try --hypothesis … [--observed-output FILE --exit-code N -- <the command you ran>] [-- <cmd>]

Debug ledger (D34): every attempt at fixing one symptom with the tree it ran on, the patch vs the base, the failure at file::symbol and progress; definitive loop rules say stop (exit 3), heuristic ones warn. Failures are read from pytest output, Python tracebacks, Minecraft GameTest summaries, JVM, Go, Rust and Node output. A run you made yourself is agent-reported: it never verifies anything and never outweighs Verinoda's own runs of the same tree. A narrowed command's pass is never a pass of the repro; skipping or deselecting the failing tests is caught

debug status|diff|close [--resolved-by N [--accept-test-edit]|--abandoned]

The ledger; the working tree against the base or an attempt; close (resolved needs a pass of the repro command on the current tree, no Verinoda run of that tree failing, and the user's decision on any test changed since the first attempt; when the baseline passed, a failure seen only after an edit is the edit's own and does not count as the symptom; Verinoda never says "fixed")

debug differential [--trace] [--prepare] [--overlay PATH]|bisect [--good REF] [--attempts]|rerun [--times N]|observe

Strategies in throw-away copies, each recorded: the repro at the base with the symptom's test held fixed and the diff's hunks ranked; a bisect that runs both ends first (over commits, or with --attempts over the session's own attempts and agent steps, each recorded tree rebuilt from the base and the blob store: the first attempt whose tree fails, with the run ids on both sides); the pass rate; a traced run (are the edits reached, the call chain to the crash)

debug flaky [--runs N] [--test ID] / debug quarantine TEST_ID [--remove] [--reason TEXT]

Each test's pass rate over the runs the debug ledger made (every run Verinoda makes of a repro, debug rerun included, keeps each test's outcome; a runner without per-test results counts as its command): flaky tests (both outcomes on one tree), failing tests whose change held for N passes in a row on a changed tree (default debug.rerun_times, 5) and your quarantine list with each test's state; heuristics (strong_inference) with the runs' evidence ids, never "fixed". Verinoda never skips a quarantined test; --json

review [--base REF | --staged | --target FILE::NAME --change body|signature|remove] [--since-last] [--run-tests] [--observe] [--max-chars N] [--coverage REPORT]

Change review (D35): the changed definitions, their dependents with via-chains, findings by concern (persistence, security, performance, public API, config, entry points), a verdict per public definition added, removed or re-signed (api_changes: breaking with the call sites it breaks, compatible, or unknown), which tests reach the change and which code none reaches, the affected tests (the test-to-code map every traced run updates first, static reach as the fallback, each labelled) with one pytest command that runs them, the changed lines a coverage report shows no test ran (any language: lcov, Cobertura XML, JaCoCo XML, coverage.py JSON, found at the usual paths or given with --coverage) with the patch coverage, what to read first (changed code, call sites, then finding lines, each hottest function first by its changes in the last 500 commits touching the file x cyclomatic complexity), who should review it (the authors of the base lines it modifies, by git blame -w, the change's own author left out, as strong_inference; the CODEOWNERS rule of each changed file) and the earlier commits that changed the same definitions (git log -L from the base, each message quoted), a risk score (risk: the findings the change introduced, breaking and unjudged public API changes, dependents, changed code no test reaches, changed lines a coverage report shows no test ran and the unknowns, each count x weight up to a cap, every part listed with its points and anything not measured said; strong_inference, a heuristic whose low values never mean safe), and the decision records the change reaches (a governed symbol changed, a file or line a guard names, a manifest line or new file a revisit condition names) with the line of each, and what the change makes stale (made_stale: the stored claims whose recorded symbol, section or file fingerprints differ between base and head, the notes fresh on the base and changed or gone on the head, the decision records whose governed symbol or own file changed; nothing is written, update marks the claims), and in a monorepo the workspace packages the change affects (affected: the packages holding changed files and those declaring a dependency on them, each with its manifest line, as verinoda affected lists them); exit 3 when there are findings, unknowns or changed lines a fresh report shows no test ran; --since-last leaves out the findings the last recorded review of the same base and mode already listed (matched by concern, rule, file and text with numbers masked, so lines that moved do not count as new), says how many, lists the ones gone and names the changed definitions new since then

sarif FILE ... [--path P] [--limit N]

SARIF 2.1 in and out. In: a linter's or CodeQL's SARIF files read as evidence, each result a claim at its file:line (the file tied to the repository as a relative path, under a uriBaseId, or by the longest existing suffix of an absolute CI path), with its tool, rule, level and the innermost definition around it; the named tool's statement, not checked here: strong_inference while the SARIF file is newer than the file, else weak_inference; suppressed, pass and fixed (baselineState: absent) results are counted, not listed; errors first; exit 4 = no file read. Out: review --sarif, check --sarif and decide check --sarif print their findings as a SARIF 2.1.0 log for GitHub code scanning (github/codeql-action/upload-sarif): one rule per finding kind, each result at the cited file:line with its status and evidence in properties, the level from the status (verified error, strong_inference warning, weaker note; a review finding is a warning at most), baselined and waived guard violations suppressed; the exit code is unchanged

affected [--base REF | --staged | --file PATH ...]

The workspace packages of a monorepo a change affects (the same block as review's affected key): packages from the manifests (npm, yarn and pnpm workspaces, Cargo members, Gradle include, Maven <modules>, Python pyproject.toml and Go go.mod in subfolders), the packages holding changed files, then every package that declares a dependency on one of them, each with the manifest line and the chain; statically_verified when the manifest says the dependency is the local package (workspace:, a Cargo path, project(...), a Go replace or go.work, a uv or Poetry local source, a Maven module of the same group), else strong_inference; npm scripts as build targets; changed files outside every package listed, not followed. --file names the changed files instead of the git diff

coverage [PATH ...] [--report FILE] [--base-report FILE [--base REF]] [--limit N]

Coverage reports read into lines and symbols, in any language: lcov (istanbul, c8, Jest, Vitest, cargo-llvm-cov, ...), Cobertura XML (coverage.py, gcovr, ...), JaCoCo XML (Gradle, Maven) and coverage.py JSON, found at the usual paths (also in sub-project folders) or given with --report; the report's files tied to the repository's by path (com/ex/Foo.java to src/main/java/com/ex/Foo.java). Per definition: the measured lines that ran, the ones that did not, and the tests that ran them where the report names them (lcov TN:, coverage.py contexts); least covered first, each a claim with file:line and the report as evidence, strong_inference while the report is newer than the file, else weak_inference. --base-report: the lines whose coverage changed, the indirect ones (files the working tree did not change) listed apart. Nothing is run; exit 4 = no report read

health [PATH ...] [--limit N] [--min-similarity R] [--min-tokens N] [--no-clones]

Code health per function (default: every code file that is not a test): cyclomatic and cognitive complexity, deepest nesting with its line, length and parameters, counted on the syntax tree (Python ast, the tree-sitter grammars) and so statically_verified; a health score from 10 down to 1, one point per smell threshold reached, and near-duplicate function pairs with a similarity ratio of their normalised tokens (names and literals replaced), both heuristics and so strong_inference. Lowest health first. review has the same measure as its health concern: a changed function whose health fell (base and head metrics), an added one below 10, and a near-duplicate the change made in the same file

probe [--changed | --target FILE::NAME] [--base REF] [--property EXPR] [--emit-test [--template roundtrip|idempotent|equivalence] [--inverse FILE::NAME] [--test-file PATH]] [--allow-side-effects]

Behaviour probe (D36, Python): generated inputs on the old and the new version of a changed function in throw-away copies; behaviour differences, new exceptions and non-determinism with examples; refuses functions with side effects it cannot isolate. With --template, --emit-test checks a roundtrip, idempotence or equivalence-with-the-base property on those inputs and writes it as a pytest file (never over an existing one), saying on how many inputs it was observed to hold

observe [TEST_ID …] [--for SYMBOL …] [--terms W …] [--mode …]

Run tests under the call tracer in an isolated copy; reach per test, boundary calls, limits

resolve-call PATH:LINE TARGET [--target PATH:LINE]

Precise resolution of one call site (needs the precise extra; exit 3 = no precise answer)

check [PATH ...] [--diff [REV]] [--stdin --as PATH] [--env auto|PATH|none] [--all]

Python, Java, Kotlin, and TypeScript/JavaScript imports. Do the names code uses exist? Python: imports, from-imports, attributes, keyword arguments and constant dict keys, checked in the project's own environment; Java: imports, types, methods with their number of arguments, fields, constructors and Mixin targets; Kotlin: imports, types, members and properties (D45); TypeScript/JavaScript: imports (D46); against the project, its classpath (Loom or code_check.classpath) and the JDK; --diff only the changed lines (the default without PATHs; any git diff prefix setting, also from a subdirectory), --stdin --as code not written yet. Each site: exists / absent (with nearest names and where else it is defined) / unknown (why) / not_installed / guarded. Needs the precise extra; exit 3 = something absent or a version differs from the lock; exit 4 = nothing absent, but a file asked for was not checked (a file in another language, a notebook, a Python file that does not parse: listed under not_checked, never passed)

check --deps [--env auto|PATH|none]

Declared against used dependencies: pyproject/requirements (with PEP 735 and Poetry groups), package.json (with workspaces) and Gradle/Maven builds against the imports of the project's own files. Four findings, each a claim with file:line evidence (the declaration, the import sites, the lock-file line) and a status: missing (imported, declared nowhere), transitive_only (imported, installed only because a declared package requires it: the project environment's metadata, the npm lock file or node_modules), unused (a runtime dependency nothing imports) and wrong_group (a dev dependency runtime code imports, or a runtime one only tests and tools import). statically_verified only where the environment or the lock file shows it; by name, unused and wrong_group are strong_inference; JVM imports are never missing. Nothing is run or installed; MCP code_check(deps=true); exit 3 = something found, 4 = no manifest read

api NAME [--env ...] [--private] [--docs]

The real members of a Python module, class or function in the project's environment, or of a Java class as the build sees it (project, classpath with the Minecraft jars, JDK: signatures, access, where inherited members come from), with signatures, file:line and the installed version; --docs also quotes the definition's docstring and the section of the installed distribution's README that names it, each with its lines and the version (read from the installed files, offline); exit 3 = not found (missing from a module or class whose names are all known, or no such module); a name it cannot decide is found: null with exit 0; a name of the project's Java/Kotlin/TS/... code is found: null with decided: unsupported_language, exit 4

memory list [KEY]|learn KEY VALUE [--claim ID] [--ttl 30d]|forget KEY [--reason R]|history KEY

Versioned learnings, invalidated (never deleted) with their source claim, when their time-to-live (--ttl: m, h, d or w) runs out, or by forget. history lists a key's events (ADD, UPDATE, DELETE, EXPIRE, INVALIDATE, each dated with its reason) and its versions

install/uninstall --agent claude|codex --scope project|user

Skill (+ MCP) for Claude Code (/verinoda) and Codex ($verinoda)

mcp serve [--profile core|full]

MCP server (stdio) over the same core, 40 tools; by default the core profile lists project_query, analyze, code_check, index_update and run_tool, which reaches the other core tools by name (node_inspect, relation_trace, map_view, claim_inspect, claim_list, evidence_inspect, change_review, history_search, and decision_check and dependency_ask in a project with decision records); index_update on a folder never scanned runs the first scan (never in a home folder, a drive root or a workspace of several projects); --profile full, or "mcp": {"profile": "full"} in .verinoda/config.json of a trusted project (verinoda trust) or in the user-level config, serves all. A config whose mcp setting cannot be read (not JSON, mcp not an object, profile not a string or unknown) stops the server with the fix; only a missing setting serves the core profile

mcp prompts [NAME] [--arg NAME=VALUE] [--profile core|full]

The ready workflows the MCP server also offers as prompts (prompts/list, prompts/get): review [base], onboarding [topic], debug symptom [repro], pre_merge [base, default main]. Each is the Verinoda tool calls for that task in order, worded for the profile's menu (a tool behind run_tool as a run_tool call, a tool the profile does not serve as its CLI command), plus the reporting rules; it states nothing about the code itself. Without NAME: the list; --json

index -- <args>

The Graphify-derived CLI (advanced, unsupported); installer, hook and ~/.graphify commands are blocked

benchmark run|sanitize

Raw search vs Graphify baseline vs Verinoda on question sets with gold facts; python -m verinoda.benchmark compare A B prints the totals and, per approach, the facts lost and gained by id (equal totals can hide a swap)

benchmark staleness replay|mutations, benchmark critique-eval, benchmark verdict-audit [--split dev|held_out|all]

Staleness harness (history replay, mutation suite), critique precision/recall, and the wrong-met verdict audit (benchmarks/verdict_audit/)

Exit codes: 0 done, 1 error, 2 usage error / invalid plan / blocked command / a trace with no path or an endpoint that does not name one symbol / an impact --target that does not name one symbol / a health path that matches no code file, 3 "needs more" (clarification, partial resolution, refused experiment, incomplete observation, no precise answer, an absent name or a lock mismatch in check, a name api did not find, a debug attempt that says stop, a debug strategy that did not settle it; decide check exits 1 on VIOLATED, 3 when something could not be checked and 2 on an error); 4 (check, api): nothing absent, but something asked for was not checked (another language, a file that does not parse). Every command except memory, mcp serve and index accepts --json (plan schema always prints JSON); JSON is compact when stdout is not a terminal.

In CI: commit the decisions folder and name it in verinoda.toml ([decisions] / dir = "docs/decisions"); run verinoda decide check --base origin/main (exit 1 violated, 3 not checked) and verinoda check --diff origin/main (exit 3 an absent name, 4 a changed file it does not read; a clean checkout has nothing changed against HEAD, so check then says nothing_to_check).

Notes and graph view

verinoda ui opens the project as linked notes in the browser, in the manner of Obsidian, built from Verinoda's own index rather than from hand-written notes:

  • A note per symbol, source file, document section and data file: qualified name (Wisp.spawn(), search_index.rank()), signature, doc text, the code (highlighted, with line numbers), and its links in sections: defined in, members, calls, called by, extends / implemented by, imports, imported by, references, the data files it names by resource id and the lines that name it, and the claims recorded about it with their status. A link the tool inferred rather than read in the code is marked ?.

  • Local graph beside every note (depth 1 to 3; tests, data files and external types can be hidden) and a graph view of the whole project at file level, coloured by folder (or by community), with a filter that highlights matching notes; files with no links ring the linked ones, and a note's links list the project's own code before tests. Both are force-directed: drag, zoom, hover to see a note's neighbours, click to open it.

  • The graph in 3D (3D in the graph view, or V): the same files and links laid out in three dimensions and drawn with perspective, no WebGL or library; the flat graph inflates into depth when you switch. Click a file and the camera flies to it; a panel says what it is in words ("extract.py is used by 136 files and uses 42"; a document mentions files, a data file is named by code) and numbers its linked files: 1-9 fly to one, N walks round all of them, Backspace goes back along your trail, F follows the file (the camera circles it), I lights up what a change to it may affect, Enter opens its note. A region (a folder, or a community when coloured by community) is framed with its busiest files and the regions it works with most; [ and ] step through them, and Tour (T) visits the product's own regions first, then tests, examples and docs, one sentence each. P puts the selected file or region on a watch list: a chip at the bottom brings you back to it, a small diamond marks a watched file, and with the local server the page says when a watched file has changed since the index (it looks every 15 seconds; the list stays in your browser). Measured on Python's standard library as a project: about 60 frames a second in Chrome with 1,745 files and 8,259 links.

  • Command bar (Ctrl+K), in English or Turkish: focus rank / odak rank flies to a note in 3D, region ui / bölge ui frames a region, impact store / etki store and path parse to rank / yol parse ile rank light up the files concerned, tour, changed, open …, or a question, which is answered as below; with an empty bar it lists what it can do. ? shows every shortcut; Esc undoes one step at a time (the tour, what is lit, the view).

  • Search by name (exact, prefix, part of the name, path) or with a question, which runs the same ranking as verinoda query; a file tree; back and forward; Turkish and English; light and dark. A question (three words or more, a question word, or a ?) also offers Answer the question: the passages verinoda query answers with, each with its lines (highlighted, opening the editor), why it was chosen and its note, then the other places found. The search index is never written for it (not in an exported file: it has no code).

  • The line a link is written on under each call, import, reference and resource-id link (not for a file edited since the last index: its line numbers would point elsewhere), and open in your editor: every file:line and a button on each note open VS Code, Cursor or VSCodium at that line (chosen at the top of the page).

  • Preview on hover: resting the mouse on a link to a note shows its kind, file and line, signature, first doc lines, your note on it, its link counts and the first lines of its code, without leaving the page.

  • What changed: Changed in the graph view rings the files edited, added or deleted since the index (what verinoda update would take in) and, in another colour, the files that use them; a note whose file changed since the index says so, since its links and lines may be off.

  • Impact and path: Impact on a note lists what may be affected when it changes: what calls, imports, extends or names it, then what uses those, up to three links back (the project's own code first, tests on or off), and turns the local graph into that set; Path… finds the shortest chain of calls, imports and references from the note to another one, or the other way round. In an exported file both work at file level.

  • Butterfly: Butterfly on a function, method or class puts the note in the middle, what calls it on the left and what it calls on the right, each a tree one to four links out; for a class it opens on the inheritance tree (what it extends or implements, and what extends or implements it, library types as leaves). Every link shows the line it is written on and the ceiling of an unchecked graph edge (strong_inference or weak_inference), and the local graph turns into the same set. verinoda butterfly NAME prints it (not in an exported file: it has no symbol graph).

  • Notes of your own on any symbol, file, section or data unit: plain Markdown (**bold**, `code`, lists, [[Name]] links another note), kept as .md files in .verinoda/notes/ (notes.dir in .verinoda/config.json puts them in a folder you commit). Each note is anchored to the code it was written about (a symbol or section by its fingerprint, found again wherever it moved; a whole file or a data unit by a hash of its lines) and shows its status: up to date, code changed (read it again, then Read it: still right, which anchors it to the code as it is now) or code gone (the symbol was renamed or deleted: edit it onto something else or delete it). The start page lists your notes, the changed ones first; verinoda notes --changed does the same on the command line and exits 1 when any note needs reading again, for CI.

It is local: a standard-library server on 127.0.0.1 (a free port unless --port is given) that answers only requests addressed to that host and port; the page loads nothing from outside (no CDN, fonts or telemetry; Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'none', scripts and styles only from the server). The one thing it writes is your notes: POST /api/usernote needs the random token of that server run, which only the page it serves carries, JSON, and this origin, so another site cannot write through it; --read-only turns writing off. It follows the index: a few seconds after verinoda update (or any rebuild) the open page redraws the note or graph it shows, keeping its scroll position, and says so (an unseen tab looks when it is shown again). verinoda ui --watch also runs verinoda update itself when the project's files change (once the edits stop; one update at a time; while another process builds the index, the watcher skips that round, the page says why, and it tries again at its next look). verinoda ui --graph opens straight on the graph view.

One file, no server. verinoda ui --export [FILE] writes the graph view and a note per source file, document and data file into one HTML file (default .verinoda/index/verinoda-graph.html; about 4.4 MB for Verinoda's own 1,150 files) that opens with a double click, or with --open right away; the command also prints its file:/// address. Checked in Chrome and Edge from file://. It is the same page with its data inside: the graph with its filters and colours, the file tree, each file's links, outline and claims, a file-level local graph and a name search (a symbol opens the note of its file). It holds no code (verinoda ui shows it) and no path of the machine it was made on (the project root and the home folder are taken out of every name); its Content-Security-Policy allows only its own script and style (by hash) and no connections, so it fetches nothing. It is a snapshot: export again after verinoda update. (The index step no longer writes the upstream Graphify graph.html, which loaded vis-network from a CDN when opened, and removes an old one; GRAPHIFY_VIZ_NODE_LIMIT set to a positive number keeps it.)

Limits: the global graph shows at most 2,500 files (the best connected ones, and it says how many it left out); code is read, not edited; the exported file has file notes only (no symbol notes, no code, no question search) and shows your notes read-only.

Measured on Python's standard library copied as a project (2,305 files, 79,526 notes, 140,342 links; Windows 11, headless Chrome): the server starts in 1.6 s, the start page shows in 1.5 s, a search in 0.8 s, a note in 0.5 s; the graph view (1,745 files, 8,249 links) draws in 0.4 s and runs at about 60 frames a second while it settles; impact and path on the most connected notes take under 20 ms. --export writes 9.3 MB in about 6 s. With --watch each look at the tree takes 0.2 s, and an update takes as long as verinoda update (above, Known issues).

Game mods, data packs and other data files

Code often names its data only through strings: a Minecraft mod runs the data-pack function mymod:wisp_death, loads config/mymod.yml, registers the item whose model is assets/mymod/models/item/x.json. Verinoda indexes those files too and follows the strings between them.

  • Data files are searchable. Text files the code graph has no node for (.mcfunction, JSON, YAML/TOML/INI/properties configs, SQL, shaders, CSV, Gradle scripts, skipped sources) become data units; configs are split by top-level section. Files it leaves out are listed with the reason (binary, may hold secrets - the graph's own secret rule -, .graphifyignore, dependency or build-output folder, generated output such as results/ or logs/, large generated JSON, minified); doctor counts them and a query names a left-out file whose name matches the question.

  • Resource ids link code and data in repositories that are packs or mods (a pack.mcmeta or a Fabric/Quilt/Forge/NeoForge manifest): ns:path ids, #ns:tags, worldgen ids, function ns:x, translation keys "item.ns.x", Identifier.of("ns", "x"), full asset paths, and bare names passed to an id constructor or a helper whose name says what it loads (runFunction(server, "wisp_death")). The context picks the registry (advancement revoke ... only ns:x names an advancement, "parent" a model). Query output shows names: / named by: lines; a link whose namespace is assumed or whose kind the line does not state is marked inferred, and an analyze claim built from it is strong_inference.

  • Identical copies of a data file (a data pack shipped twice) rank once, as the copy in the source set; the others are listed as same content:.

  • Java and Kotlin calls the extractor drops (a class name that exists twice in the repository, calls through typed variables, Kotlin calling Java) are added when the file's imports or package bind the class, and graded like any call site.

  • Callbacks (docs/DESIGN.md D38): a method reference passed on (END_SERVER_TICK.register(RepairScheduler::tick), createTickerHelper(..., Block::serverTick)) is a registers edge, never a call and never weighed by the ranking. trace follows it when no call path exists and labels the hop callback; impact, the UI and review list the method that registers a changed one; a claim "A calls B" that only a method reference supports stays weak_inference. map --view dataflow starts at the mod's entry points (fabric.mod.json, Fabric initializers, @Mod, @SubscribeEvent, mixin handlers, registered callbacks) and knows JVM file writes, NbtIo and dirty flags; all of these are text heuristics, each with its reason.

  • Reference trees: verinoda setup --reference original-plugin/=original,plugin keeps an original implementation searchable but ranks it at 0.6x unless the question says "original", "plugin" or the folder name. A folder that holds a copy of the project's own code (a benchmark corpus with an older version, a vendored snapshot) is found at every scan and update and ranked the same way: most of its files have a twin elsewhere defining the same names, nothing outside it uses it, and the twins are in code the project does use (copies.json; index.not_copies or index.detect_copies: false in .verinoda/config.json undo it). A port next to its original with nothing else using either is left to --reference.

  • Turkish names from the repository: parallel locale files (lang/en_us.json + lang/tr_tr.json, locales/en.json + locales/tr.json) teach the lexicon that "Fener Asası" is lantern_staff.

examples/glow_mod/ is a small fictional Fabric mod with a data pack, a config file, a reference tree and a copied data pack; its question set (glow_mod, 14 questions, 7 Turkish) was written without running Verinoda on it. Results: docs/BENCHMARKS.md.

Coding agents

verinoda install --agent claude --scope project   # .claude/skills/verinoda/SKILL.md + .mcp.json entry
verinoda install --agent codex  --scope project   # .agents/skills/verinoda/SKILL.md (+ MCP config)
verinoda uninstall --agent claude --scope project # removes only what install recorded
  • Claude Code: /verinoda how does checkout reach the database?

  • Codex: mention $verinoda in the prompt. (Codex has no /verinoda command.)

The skills describe the working method; all logic lives in the CLI/MCP core. They read the CLI's plain text and add --json only for a field the text leaves out (JSON cost 2-5x the tokens for the same content). Two protocols come first:

  1. References the user gives. When the message has links, repository or package names, versions, commits, PR/issue numbers, papers or docs, the agent runs verinoda resolve "<message>" (MCP reference_resolve) before researching or answering. It reports each reference as <name> @ <pin> (basis: …) with each mismatch on its own line. It never substitutes the default branch for a version the user named, asks only the returned questions_for_user, and states every unresolved part with its next step.

  2. Understand the question first. verinoda plan draft "<message>" (MCP question_plan_draft). Then the agent edits the plan: it splits compound questions, glosses domain words, copies versions exactly as written, and never invents candidates. Then verinoda plan check: exit 0 ready, 2 invalid, 3 needs clarification. The agent asks only the returned clarifications (AskUserQuestion in Claude Code; request_user_input or plain text in Codex) and records the answers. Then verinoda analyze --plan <file>. The answer starts with "Understood as / Anladığım: …", followed by one block per sub-question with its verdict, claims and unknowns.

  3. Check the names code uses (Python, Java). After every edit, and before proposing code, the agent runs verinoda check --diff (MCP code_check; code not written yet: --stdin --as <path>). It never keeps an absent site: it fixes it from nearest / elsewhere or from verinoda api <module.or.Class> (MCP api_members). unknown is unverified, not fine. The report names the environment it checked. It reads Python and Java: a Kotlin or TypeScript file, or one that does not parse, comes back under not_checked (exit 4), and the agent says so instead of reporting a pass.

  4. Confirm your own sentences. A sentence the agent writes about the code is recorded with a typed kind (claim add --kind relation|config|order|location --symbol X) or a verbatim quote; plain prose is at most weak_inference, and a not_found name is reported, not replaced.

  5. Decisions are the user's. For a should-we / which-one question the agent runs verinoda decide brief, asks the questions_for_human, records the user's explicit choice (decide record) and never picks for them; before finishing a code change it runs verinoda decide check --changed.

  6. Keep a debug ledger. debug start before the first edit of a bug fix, debug try --hypothesis after every edit; on stop it stops editing and follows the first strategy, and it asks before changing a test's expectation.

Then the evidence discipline: report claims with their status, never upgrade a status by wording, challenge what you rely on, report unknown with its next step, and treat user critique as a hypothesis (feedback add --process).

How claims stay honest

  • Relevant evidence, checked in one place. A *_verified status needs one evidence group that is verifying, fresh and mechanically entails the claim (for example: an AST call to the target at the cited line inside the claimed caller; a definition spanning exactly the cited lines). Every stored status change passes through this check, so unrelated evidence cannot verify a claim on any path (API, verify, feedback, experiments, runtime runs, MCP).

  • Word overlap never verifies. Every word of "apply_discount returns the subtotal above the threshold" is in the lines that return subtotal * 0.9 there. Term coverage makes evidence relevant (partial), never a verification; only a verbatim quote (path:12 contains: <text>, which verifies the quoted text and nothing around it) or a kind's typed check (call site, definition span, environment read, call order) verifies. A written claim that states more than its check binds (another callee, a condition or bound, a negation, the arguments of a call, another file than the cited one) stays unverified.

  • Every role is bound. A written relation must name the caller and the callee in the right direction ("OrderRepository.save calls place_order" is checked against save's body); a written config claim ("the discount threshold is read from ORDERS_MAX_ITEMS") must be about the name the read is bound to. claim add answers a definitive miss at once, with its scope: "no direct call to save in create_order_handler (orders/api.py:16-21); calls through other names are not followed".

  • A name written as code is never replaced by a similar one. analyze, plan check and trace report not_found with did_you_mean ("no symbol named place_orders in this repository; nearest: place_order (orders/service.py:19)"); the sub-question is unmet. A name spelled only in a file changed since the index is "not in the index yet"; one the index spells but has no symbol for (a constant, an attribute) is not_a_symbol, with where it occurs. trace, map --view impact and node_inspect share one resolver: a detected copy of the project gives way to the original, test, example, fixture and vendored code to the product's own, and a name that several symbols still carry is listed, not picked (pass path/file.py::Name).

  • A stale index is never silent. Reading commands list the files changed since the index; analyze says when it answered from the previous index, and a changed file that spells the question's subject caps that sub-question at met_with_inference.

  • A graph edge (EXTRACTED/INFERRED) is never enough on its own. Search results, model summaries and user feedback are not even support for an inference. A claim with no evidence is unknown.

  • Definitive vs heuristic refutation. Only an exhaustive check within a stated scope (no call to the target on the cited line, a precise resolver's definitive different target, …) makes a claim contradicted. A heuristic doubt lowers it one step and adds an uncertainty.

  • Facet-level staleness. Claims depend on symbol facets (signature, body, name bindings, doc sections, the test set). An edit makes a claim stale on the next update/analyze only if something it depends on changed. Code that only moved is relocated through anchors, and a duplicated line is reported ambiguous rather than guessed.

  • Critique and re-verification never raise a claim above its assessed ceiling. Critique is idempotent and never restores a stale or contradicted claim.

  • Runtime observations are run-scoped ("observed in run R at commit C"). They never support an "always" claim, and calls seen through test doubles never support production edges.

  • Nothing is deleted: user corrections supersede (the old claim is kept as contradicted with superseded_by), claim text is immutable, and history, plans, reference resolutions and runtime runs are append-only.

  • Heuristics state their method and limits (coverage.limits, uncertainties, derived_by). Budget exhaustion or irrelevant retrieval yields unknown with the next verification step.

Name check (Python)

verinoda check answers one question for code an agent (or you) just wrote: do the modules, functions, methods, keyword arguments and dict keys it uses exist, in this project's environment?

$ verinoda check orders/ai/export.py
orders/ai/export.py:7:28  ABSENT  import orders.service.place_orders
    not found in module orders.service in this project (orders/service.py)
    nearest: place_order (orders/service.py:19)
orders/ai/export.py:15:43  ABSENT  kwarg compute_total(currency=)
    keyword currency= not found in the signature compute_total(items: list[dict]) (orders/pricing.py:6)
orders/ai/export.py:19:10  unknown  attribute repo.save_order
    `repo` is a parameter: its runtime type is not known
  • Which environment: --env PATH, else the project's .venv, venv or env when its base interpreter is a known Python installation outside the project (otherwise the note names the program --env .venv would start), else Verinoda's own interpreter for the standard library only: third-party names are then not_installed, never absent. The MCP tools never start a program from the project.

  • When it says absent: only when the container's names are all known (a module without __getattr__ or dynamic writes, a class without descriptors or code that sets attributes from outside, an instance made right there, one known signature without **kwargs, the dict literals a function returns), and jedi also found nothing. The wording is "not found in as installed in ()", never "does not exist".

  • Unknown is not fine: parameters, annotations, inferred return values, **kwargs, module __getattr__, names assigned elsewhere, sys.path changes in conftest.py, and standard-library names of another platform or Python version (collections.Mapping) stay unknown with the reason.

  • What it does not read is never a pass: a file in another language, a notebook, a Cython file or a Python file that does not parse is listed under not_checked with the reason; with nothing absent the exit is 4 (3 means an absent name or a version that differs from the lock).

  • verinoda api packaging.specifiers.SpecifierSet lists the real members before a call is written. Existence and signature shape only: a real name used wrongly is not detected.

Documentation

License

Apache-2.0 (see LICENSE); portions originally under MIT (LICENSE-MIT). NOTICE records the Graphify origin and the modifications.

Available Tools

5 tools
analyzeA

Answer a question as claims with evidence: one verdict per sub-question, claims with file:line, unknowns with next steps, and the passages. needs_clarification is a normal result (ask the user). run_tests / observe also run or trace the tests that reach the answer (isolated copy). Re-indexes first if the tree changed.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
questionYesThe question.
budget_secondsNoWall-time budget in seconds (1-600).

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false, and the description explains why: it re-indexes first if the tree changed. It also discloses that test runs/traces happen on an isolated copy and that needs_clarification can be a legitimate result. That is meaningful behavioral context beyond the annotation flags, though the side effects of re-indexing are not fully spelled out.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The purpose is front-loaded in the first clause, which is good, but the remaining text is a dense run-on mixing result format, clarification behavior, test execution, and re-indexing. Phrases like 'run_tests / observe also run or trace the tests' are cryptic and cost the reader clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description must carry the return contract, and it does: verdicts, claims with file:line, unknowns with next steps, passages, plus clarification and test behavior. For a complex analysis tool this is fairly complete, though side-effect and failure-mode detail remains thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with two parameters (question, budget_seconds), so the schema already documents both. The description adds no syntax, format, or budget-interaction detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb+resource: it answers a question and returns verdicts, claims with file:line, unknowns with next steps, and passages. That is far more concrete than the bare name 'analyze' suggests. However, it never names or contrasts with the siblings (project_query, code_check), so an agent cannot cleanly route between them from this text alone.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied (pose a question, expect claims/evidence) and it usefully notes that needs_clarification is a normal outcome to escalate to the user, plus the budget parameter exists. But there is no explicit when-to-use vs. when-not, no prerequisites, and no routing guidance against project_query or code_check, leaving selection to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

code_checkA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Python, Java, Kotlin, TS/JS imports; other languages: not_checked (exit 4). For code you wrote or edited: do the modules, names, methods, arguments and keys it uses exist in the project and its environment? Input: paths, diff (a revision; nothing: changes against HEAD), or snippet + as_path. Each site: exists | absent (nearest names) | unknown | not_installed | guarded; exit 3 = absent.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
depsNoInstead: the manifests' dependencies vs the imports.
diffNoA revision (e.g. 'HEAD'): only lines changed against it.
pathsNoRepository-relative files or directories.
as_pathNoWith snippet: the file it is for.
snippetNoCode not written yet, checked as if it were in as_path.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, so the bar is lower, and the description still adds real behavioral detail: unsupported languages return not_checked (exit 4), exit 3 signals an absent site, and the per-site vocabulary (exists/absent/unknown/not_installed/guarded). This is well beyond what the annotations convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the language coverage, which is useful, but the rest is compressed into telegraphic fragments ('Input: paths, diff (a revision; nothing: changes against HEAD), or snippet + as_path') that are hard to parse. Every element earns its place, but the structure is cramped and reads like notes rather than guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description correctly carries the full burden of explaining results via exit codes and site statuses, which it does. It stops short of explaining some statuses precisely (guarded, not_installed) and the exact output shape, leaving minor gaps for a tool with five optional params.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description meaningfully supplements it: diff means 'a revision; nothing: changes against HEAD', snippet pairs with as_path, and deps switches to manifest-vs-import comparison. That default-behavior clarification is genuine added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource: checking whether modules, names, methods, arguments and keys referenced by code 'exist in the project and its environment,' and names the exact languages covered. It is not tautological and scopes the tool well, though it never explicitly distinguishes itself from the vague siblings (analyze, project_query).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives an implied use case ('For code you wrote or edited') and enumerates the three input modes (paths, diff, snippet + as_path), plus a one-line alternative-mode hint for deps. However it never states when to prefer this over siblings like analyze or project_query, and offers no exclusions beyond the language restriction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

index_updateA

Re-index after editing files (on a folder never scanned: the first scan); claims whose files changed become stale. mode: noop | incremental | full | first_scan.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare a non-read-only, non-idempotent mutation, and the description usefully adds that claims whose files changed 'become stale' — a real behavioral consequence. However, it never explains what re-indexing actually rebuilds or whether concurrent runs are safe, and the listed modes are unexplained, so it is adequate rather than rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two dense sentences with the core action front-loaded and no filler. The parenthetical and mode tail are slightly compressed/awkward but not wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with annotations covering safety and no output schema, the description covers purpose, trigger, effect on claims, and mode options — enough for correct invocation. The unexplained mode list and schema mismatch are the only gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema declares zero properties, which would baseline at 4, but the description introduces a 'mode' parameter with enum values (noop | incremental | full | first_scan) that do not exist in the schema — a confusing mismatch rather than genuine parameter elucidation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Re-index after editing files') and adds scope context (first scan on a never-scanned folder). It does not differentiate itself from siblings like analyze or code_check, which it plausibly overlaps with, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The trigger is implied ('after editing files') and the parenthetical hints at the first-scan case, but no alternative tool is named and there is no explicit when-not-to-use guidance. Usage is inferable but not spelled out.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

project_queryA
Read-onlyIdempotent

Where is X / what handles Y: ranked code locations as plain text (path:lines headers, call outlines, numbered source lines; up to 6000 chars, truncation stated). format='json' for programs. Hits are leads, not verified claims.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
formatNo'text' (default): plain text for reading, skeleton first; 'json': structured items.text
questionYesQuestion, symbol or file names to look up; filters narrow it: path:GLOB lang: symbol: is:vendored /regex/ AND OR NOT.
max_itemsNoMaximum code locations to return (1-25).

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. On top of that the description discloses output shape (path:lines headers, call outlines, numbered source lines), a 6000-char cap with stated truncation, and the important caveat that hits are unverified leads rather than confirmed claims.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely dense and front-loaded: purpose first, then output shape, then format switch, then the reliability caveat. The long parenthetical is information-rich rather than padded, though the telegraphic style borders on terse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries the return-value burden and does so: it describes the plain-text layout, the char cap, and truncation reporting, plus the 'leads not verified claims' caveat. This is nearly complete for a read-only query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents question, format, and max_items with enums and defaults. The description's only parameter-level addition is the 'format=json for programs' guidance, which largely restates the enum meaning, so baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: answering location/handler questions by returning ranked code locations. The 'Where is X / what handles Y' framing makes the retrieval purpose immediately concrete. It does not differentiate itself from siblings analyze, code_check, or run_tool, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: it is clearly a lookup tool, and 'format=json for programs' hints at a caller profile. However, no when-to-use/when-not conditions and no alternatives (analyze, code_check) are named, leaving the agent to infer routing between siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

run_toolB

Run one more Verinoda tool (name, arguments). node_inspect {name}: a symbol's definition and edges with file:line; relation_trace {source, target, mode?: flow|any}: call paths between symbols; map_view {view: hierarchy|dependencies|dataflow|config|tests|history|impact|cycles|outline|dead|hotspots|sides|repo|saved, targets?}; claim_list {status?}, claim_inspect {claim_id}, evidence_inspect {evidence_id}: earlier claims, evidence re-checked; change_review {targets?, change?: body|signature|remove} before editing, {since_last?} after: what it touches; history_search {text, regex?, path?}: when text came/went; {symbol}: its commits; {message?, author?, since?, until?, diff?, path?}: commits; {base, head?}: compare.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe tool.
argumentsNoIts arguments, e.g. {"name": "Cls.method"}.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is partly covered. The description adds semantic context about what each sub-tool inspects (definitions, call paths, claims, history), but never says which sub-tools mutate state or what side effects a dispatch can cause, which matters given readOnlyHint=false.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The opening sentence is front-loaded, but the rest is a dense run-on catalog using inconsistent notation (bare names, {braces} for some optional params, '?' markers) that is hard to scan. The information is dense but poorly structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 10-sub-tool dispatcher with an open-ended 'arguments' object and no output schema, the catalog is the necessary core and is mostly present, but two enum values are undocumented and per-sub-tool argument semantics are terse or missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema documents 'name' (enum) and leaves 'arguments' as a free-form object with only a generic example, so the description carries the real payload documentation by spelling out each sub-tool's arguments. It falls short of 5 because grep_context and read_context appear in the enum but are never described.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The lead sentence states a specific verb and resource ('Run ... Verinoda tool') and the enumeration makes clear this is a dispatcher over named sub-tools. However, the phrasing 'one more' is odd and no sibling tool (project_query, analyze, code_check) is referenced, so the agent gets no differentiation from alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The catalog implies routing — e.g. 'change_review before editing, {since_last?} after' and 'history_search ... when text came/went' — which helps pick a sub-tool. But there is no guidance on when to call run_tool at all versus the sibling tools, and no explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. 12 tool updatesv0.4.0
    • Changedanalyze7 fields changed
      • removedInput schema / properties / budget_calls
        Removed value: -{
        -  "default": 40,
        -  "description": "Internal tool-call budget (1-200).",
        -  "type": "integer"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / observe
        Removed value: -{
        -  "default": false,
        -  "description": "Trace the tests that reach the answer with the runtime call tracer (isolated copy) and attach what they observed.",
        -  "type": "boolean"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / plan_json
        Removed value: -{
        -  "default": "",
        -  "description": "A checked question plan as JSON text (from `verinoda plan check`); used instead of drafting one.",
        -  "type": "string"
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / question / default
        Removed value: -""
      • changedInput schema / properties / question / description
        Previous value: -"The question to answer with claims and evidence (optional when plan_json is given: the plan's user_message is used)."New value: +"The question."
      • removedInput schema / properties / run_tests
        Removed value: -{
        -  "default": false,
        -  "description": "Also run the tests that statically reach the answer (isolated copy, allowlisted runners only).",
        -  "type": "boolean"
        -}
      • addedInput schema / required
        Added value: +[
        +  "question"
        +]
    • Removedchange_review
    • Removedclaim_inspect
    • Removedclaim_list
    • Changedcode_check7 fields changed
      • changedInput schema / properties / as_path / description
        Previous value: -"With snippet: the repository-relative file it is meant for (imports and relative imports resolve from there)."New value: +"With snippet: the file it is for."
      • addedInput schema / properties / deps
        Added value: +{
        +  "default": false,
        +  "description": "Instead: the manifests' dependencies vs the imports.",
        +  "type": "boolean"
        +}
      • changedInput schema / properties / diff / description
        Previous value: -"A revision: check only the sites on lines changed against it, plus new files (e.g. 'HEAD')."New value: +"A revision (e.g. 'HEAD'): only lines changed against it."
      • removedInput schema / properties / env
        Removed value: -{
        -  "anyOf": [
        -    {
        -      "type": "string"
        -    },
        -    {
        -      "type": "null"
        -    }
        -  ],
        -  "default": null,
        -  "description": "'auto' (default: the project's .venv, venv or env), a virtual environment directory whose base interpreter is a Python installation this system knows, outside the project (nothing the repository supplies is started), or 'none' (standard library only)."
        -}
      • removedInput schema / properties / include_exists
        Removed value: -{
        -  "default": false,
        -  "description": "Also list the sites that exist.",
        -  "type": "boolean"
        -}
      • changedInput schema / properties / paths / description
        Previous value: -"Repository-relative files or directories to check (whole files)."New value: +"Repository-relative files or directories."
      • changedInput schema / properties / snippet / description
        Previous value: -"Python code not written yet, checked as if it were in as_path."New value: +"Code not written yet, checked as if it were in as_path."
    • Removeddecision_check
    • Removedevidence_inspect
    • Removedmap_view
    • Removednode_inspect
    • Changedproject_query1 field changed
      • changedInput schema / properties / question / description
        Previous value: -"Question, symbol or file names to look up."New value: +"Question, symbol or file names to look up; filters narrow it: path:GLOB lang: symbol: is:vendored /regex/ AND OR NOT."
    • Removedrelation_trace
    • Addedrun_tool
  2. 12 tool updatesv0.1.0
    • First observedanalyze
    • First observedchange_review
    • First observedclaim_inspect
    • First observedclaim_list
    • First observedcode_check
    • First observeddecision_check
    • First observedevidence_inspect
    • First observedindex_update
    • First observedmap_view
    • First observednode_inspect
    • First observedproject_query
    • First observedrelation_trace

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 5 tools

Disambiguation3/5

project_query and analyze both answer code questions, with project_query focused on ranked locations and analyze on claims/evidence, but the boundary is not always clear. The run_tool meta-tool bundles many sub-operations that overlap with top-level tools, increasing misselection risk. Descriptions help somewhat but overlap remains.

Naming Consistency3/5

Names use snake_case consistently, but the word order and verb style are mixed: index_update and run_tool are verb_noun, project_query and code_check are noun_verb/noun phrases, and analyze is a bare verb. This is readable but not a predictable pattern.

Tool Count5/5

Five top-level tools is well within the typical 3-15 range and each covers a distinct core workflow: indexing, querying, analysis, checking, and extended operations. The meta-tool run_tool keeps the surface scoped while still exposing many capabilities.

Completeness4/5

The set covers indexing, code location search, evidence-based analysis, code existence checking, and a broad set of secondary operations via run_tool. Minor gaps exist in top-level access to symbol-level inspection and project overview, but these are reachable through run_tool.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables locating evidence for repository questions using CodeGraph or ripgrep, providing verified results and follow-ups.
    14 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Local-first evidence-backed repository memory for coding agents, providing read-only tools to list concepts, explain them, get governed context packs, and verify claims against the codebase.
    45 PyPI
    11
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables coding agents to query a local, versioned knowledge graph of a software project, retrieving overviews, context packs, evidence, and explanations to make informed changes.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Provides local-first repository architecture analysis with file-level proof, enabling agents to map codebases, locate implementations, trace call paths, and assess change impact with deterministic evidence.
    4 npm
    2
    MIT