Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
AIR MCP Server

AIR MCP Server

by VericyIO
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to AIR MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • io.github.Medxpert-org/ubic

      Medxpert-org
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents and builders to run local, audit-traceable governance assessments, including an A³ scorecard, ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST evidence templates, compliance checklists, passport lookup, and sensitive-text screening.
      MIT

    • Phantom MCP

      mokhalifa83
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables authorized compliance verification and security auditing through natural language, bridging AI assistants with industry-standard security tools for enterprise audits.
      24
      -

    • mcp-server-scf

      MarkAC007
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with the SCF Controls Platform for security compliance, including browsing controls, tracking implementation, managing evidence, assessing risks, and monitoring vendors via natural language.
      26
      790 npm
      3
      MIT
    • AWS SRA Verify MCP Server

      AWS SRA Verify MCP Serverofficial

      awslabs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to assess AWS environments against the AWS Security Reference Architecture (SRA) by providing tools to discover, describe, and run security checks across AWS services and accounts.
      5
      3
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 45 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools overlap significantly, especially around starting assessments (air_start_assessment, air_run_full_assessment_pipeline, air_run_assessment_from_file) and answering facts (air_ask_open_facts, air_submit_fact_answers, air_save_prepared_answers). Descriptions are detailed and provide some differentiation, but an agent could easily misselect among these similarly purposed tools.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent air_verb_noun or air_verb pattern in snake_case. There is no mixing of camelCase or inconsistent verb styles; the prefix and structure are predictable throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    45 tools is excessive for the apparent scope, with multiple redundant entry points for the same core workflows (assessment initiation, fact answering, uploads). The server would benefit from consolidation to reduce cognitive load and misselection risk.

    Completeness4/5

    Core lifecycle for risk assessment is well covered: project creation, document upload and extraction, assessment start and reporting, fact answering, decisions, credits, and account flows. Minor gaps exist such as no project update/delete or document deletion, but agents can work around them.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Resources