Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to wcag-compliance-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits, including contrast ratio checks for color pairs and text-over-image, generate EU legal accessibility declarations, and produce aria-live monitoring snippets, all through local, multilingual tools.
      34
      2,074 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform comprehensive web accessibility checks (WCAG 2.1/2.2) including color contrast analysis, ARIA validation, and full accessibility report generation without requiring any API key.
      8
      30 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility checks for a URL or for HTML the agent just wrote, run locally in headless Chrome. 31 checks with CSS selectors, snippets and fix guidance; the same engine as the A11yScope Chrome extension.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Lets developers and MCP agents run deterministic local HTML audits, turning inline HTML into structured findings for missing labels, unnamed buttons, skipped headings, ambiguous links, duplicate IDs, and missing landmarks. It also exposes a rule list and returns stable, actionable reports without external API keys.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to deterministically audit markup and stylesheets for WCAG contrast failures, accessibility errors and design-token sprawl, and to compute contrast ratios and inventory hardcoded colors, sizes, radii and spacing before shipping UI code. Works across any web stack with Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex and Antigravity, and can also run as a CI check that exits non-zero on errors.
      739 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a clearly distinct operation: static auditing, criterion lookup, verified fix examples, and ADA deadline checking. Although audit_html_snippet and get_verified_fix_example both involve defects and corrections, their descriptions distinguish audit results from a curated remediation library.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: audit_html_snippet, lookup_wcag_criterion, get_verified_fix_example, and check_ada_compliance_deadlines. The naming is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a well-scoped set for this domain, with each tool covering a substantial but distinct compliance function. There is no filler or redundant tool.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers static auditing, WCAG reference lookup, remediation examples, and legal deadlines, which are the core needs for WCAG/ADA compliance support. The main gap is the acknowledged lack of rendered-page checks such as contrast, keyboard traps, and focus visibility, but that limitation is explicit rather than hidden.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues