Skip to main content
Glama
VectorInstitute

usa-npn-mcp-server

individual-phenometrics

Retrieve start and end dates of phenological activity for individual plants and animal species to analyze phenological patterns, individual behavior, and variation within populations.

Instructions

About the tool: Provides start and end dates of phenological activity for individual plants and animal species, derived from status data. Each record represents one 'phenological episode' - a period of continuous activity for a specific phenophase on an individual organism (like when one specific maple tree's leaves went from bud break to full leaf drop).

When to use: To understand phenological patterns within species, analyze individual plant behavior, study variation between organisms of the same species, or investigate multiple episodes of activity within a single growing season.

Key applications:

  • Studying phenological diversity within populations

  • Analyzing individual plant responses to local microclimates

  • Documenting multiple flowering/leafing episodes in water-limited ecosystems

  • Understanding species-specific phenological strategies

  • Quality control for site-level aggregations

  • Research on plant physiological responses to environmental triggers

Important considerations:

  • For plants: Shows actual start/end dates for individual organisms

  • For animals: Shows presence/absence periods at species level (since individual animals aren't tracked)

  • Requires date range specification (typically calendar year)

  • Multiple episodes may occur for same individual/phenophase within one season (e.g., after frost damage or drought recovery)

  • Essential for understanding the biological basis of site-level patterns

Data interpretation: Records show individual_id, phenophase onset/end dates, and episode duration. -9999 values indicate missing data.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
start_dateYesStart date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Must be used with end_date.
end_dateYesEnd date in YYYY-MM-DD format. Must be used with start_date.
bottom_left_x1NoX coordinate of the bottom left corner for bounding box filtering.
bottom_left_y1NoY coordinate of the bottom left corner for bounding box filtering.
upper_right_x2NoX coordinate of the upper right corner for bounding box filtering.
upper_right_y2NoY coordinate of the upper right corner for bounding box filtering.
species_idNoUnique species identifier.
station_idNoUnique identifier associated with an observer’s location.
species_typeNoSpecies type(s) the organism belongs to. Must match values from getAnimalTypes and getPlantTypes.
networkNoName of the network(s)/group(s) where the organism is observed. Must match values from getPartnerNetworks.
stateNoState where the observation occurred. Uses two-character postal abbreviation.
phenophase_categoryNoPhenophase category. Must match values from getPhenophase.
phenophase_idNoUnique identifier of the phenophase.
functional_typeNoFunctional types of the species. Must match values from getSpeciesFunctionalTypes.
climate_dataNoFlag to indicate whether all climate data fields should be returned. Accepts 0 or 1. Almost always beneficial to see climate data in relation to phenometric data.
individual_idsNoList of unique identifiers of the individuals for which the observations are made.
additional_fieldNoAdditional fields to include in output.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses key behaviors: requires date range, multiple episodes may occur, difference between plant and animal data, and -9999 indicates missing data. This covers important behavioral aspects beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with clear headings (About, When to use, Key applications, etc.), but it is somewhat verbose. Some points in 'Key applications' overlap with 'When to use'. It could be more concise while retaining key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 17 parameters, no output schema, and is complex. The description covers usage, important considerations, and data interpretation, including mention of individual_id, onset/end dates, and duration. However, it lacks explicit details on result structure, pagination, or error handling, which is a gap for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema descriptions; it mentions high-level concepts like date range and bounding box but does not elaborate on parameter details. The 'Data interpretation' section mentions output fields but not parameter specifics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool provides start and end dates of phenological activity for individual plants and animal species, derived from status data. It specifies the resource (individual phenological episodes) and the verb (provides dates). However, it does not explicitly distinguish from siblings like site-phenometrics, so it misses some differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes a 'When to use' section listing specific applications (e.g., studying phenological diversity, analyzing individual responses to microclimates). It provides clear context for intended use but does not explicitly state when not to use or mention alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/VectorInstitute/usa-npn-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server