Skip to main content
Glama
Vaquill-AI

Vaquill-AI/vaquill-mcp

Official
by Vaquill-AI

Related Servers

Alternatives to Vaquill-AI/vaquill-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides AI assistants access to the CourtListener legal database (US court opinions, dockets, RECAP, PACER, oral arguments, judges) and the full eCFR federal regulations via the official CourtListener API v4. It supports bring-your-own-key authentication and is designed for use with MCP-compatible clients like Claude, VS Code, and Cursor.
      34
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for U.S. federal law that enables searching the U.S. Code, CFR, Federal Register, case law, and bills, with citation verification against primary sources to prevent hallucinations.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for free U.S. case-law and court-docket search via CourtListener, providing tools for opinion search, docket lookup, citation verification, and more.
      10
      5 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Legalize.dev, enabling AI to query and understand legal frameworks across countries via a structured legislation API.
      13
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for accessing Turkish legislation (laws, regulations, decrees) via the Adalet Bakanligi API, providing search, full-text retrieval, and structured citations.
      5
      32 PyPI
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Nearly every tool targets a distinct resource and action, and the descriptions make the differences clear. The only real ambiguity is the deliberate generic search/fetch fallbacks alongside search_us_statutes and get_us_statute_section_text, but the descriptions explicitly direct agents to prefer the native tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is overwhelmingly consistent: snake_case verb_noun with get, list, create, update, delete, resolve, and test. Minor deviations are the bare fallback names 'search' and 'fetch', plus slight inconsistency between 'get_section_changes' and 'get_watch_change_diff', but these do not undermine the overall pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 25 tools, the server is at the heavy end of the borderline range. There are useful batch and coverage tools, but several compatibility duplicates and fine-grained section lookup variants could likely be consolidated without losing functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably complete for its domain: citation resolution, search, metadata, full text, batch operations, hierarchy browsing, coverage discovery, cross-references, definitions, change history, and a full watch lifecycle including delivery logs and testing. There are no obvious dead ends or missing operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues