Skip to main content
Glama
Valta-hq

valta-mcp

by Valta-hq

Related Servers

Alternatives to valta-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides programmable spend limits and audit trails for AI agents to make payments from a dedicated wallet, preventing overspend and unauthorized transactions.
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for ExpenseLM, a GenAI powered expense management application. Enables AI agents to access expense data for recording, insights, and advice.
      10
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enforces runtime governance on AI agent actions — file access, command execution, delegation chains, and permission escalation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI agents to request human approval before spending money, check approval status, verify signed tokens, and manage API keys.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for ClawVault - an AI agent payment security layer that enables Claude to request payments, check limits, and manage transactions with configurable rules.
      74 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: wallet management, agent control, spend authorization, proxy requests, audit, etc. There is no noticeable overlap; even seemingly similar tools like check_balance and list_wallets serve different purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools consistently use snake_case and start with 'valta_'. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_wallet, freeze_agent), though 'proxy_request' is noun_verb, which is a minor deviation. Overall, naming is clear and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 16 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but the number is still reasonable given the domain's complexity. No tool feels superfluous, and the set covers essential operations without being bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core workflows: wallet lifecycle (create, list, balance, transfer), agent management (list, get, run, freeze/unfreeze), spending policies (list, set), spend authorization, proxy requests, and audit. Minor gaps exist (no update/delete for wallets or agents), but these are not critical for the primary purpose of spend governance.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues