Skip to main content
Glama
Valar05

grounded-motion-mcp

by Valar05
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to grounded-motion-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LongBook Verifier

      Mormolykos
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that evaluates whether retrieval methods and AI outputs are grounded in long narrative manuscripts by retrieving evidence and scoring coverage deterministically, without external model APIs. It provides tools for chunking, indexing, retrieval, and evaluation.
      1
      MIT

    • Blender Pose MCP

      nar-oah
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling a single Armature's pose in Blender via a TCP bridge and add-on. It provides tools for querying the rig, reading and setting bone rotations, applying SMPL-X pose JSON, resetting pose, undo, viewport rendering, and saving .blend files.
      10
      -

    • mcp-orchestrator-framework

      ACSGenUI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A configurable MCP server that enables creating custom analysis tools through JSON configuration, with built-in frameworks for error handling, self-evaluation, security guardrails, and output artifacts.
      6 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clear and distinct purpose: tracking frames, validating schema, inspecting coverage, comparing motion, and exporting artifacts. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (export_artifacts, track_motion, validate_track, inspect_track), but compare_motion uses 'motion' instead of 'track', causing a slight inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for motion capture and review tasks. Each tool contributes a distinct step in the workflow without being excessive.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover tracking, validation, inspection, comparison, and export, but lack lifecycle management tools such as updating review status, deleting tracks, or listing all tracks, which creates gaps in a full workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources