analyze_typography

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool is analytical (not modifying), describes what it analyzes, and mentions 'Layer 2' hinting at a workflow. Could be clearer about dependencies, but for a read-only analysis tool, this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence that is front-loaded with key information ('Layer 2', 'ONLY typography'). Every part adds value, no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a specialized analysis tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core functionality and scope. It explains what the tool analyzes in detail. Minor gap: no mention of return format or any prerequisites, but not critical given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all properties. Description does not add significant new information beyond what the schema provides; it only explains the tool's overall purpose with the reference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'analyze' with resource 'typography', explicitly states 'ONLY' to distinguish from siblings like analyze_design and analyze_layout. Clearly defines scope including text animations, fonts, type scale, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides context with 'Layer 2' suggesting sequential use, and 'ONLY' indicates specialization. However, does not explicitly state when not to use or name alternatives, though sibling tools are available for broader analysis.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.