A
licenseB
qualityC
maintenanceEnables AI assistants to scaffold, edit, live-preview, and deploy full-stack apps with built-in database, email, and push notification capabilities through natural language.
19
MIT
VULK MCP Server
by VULK-dev
Related Servers
Alternatives to VULK MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
@forgespace/ui-mcpofficial
AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI-driven generation of UI components, full applications, and backend code across multiple frameworks (React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, HTML) with Figma integration and brand identity support.3865 npm2MIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceTransforms any prompt into a fully functional, production-ready product with zero human intervention by providing 150+ autonomous tools covering all aspects of software development.331MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnable AI agents to autonomously build and deploy full-stack mobile applications.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceDeploy full-stack apps from AI. 75+ tools: GitHub/Docker deploy, databases, environments, security, billing.2-
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to generate production-ready, professional UI design systems and components from simple descriptions, with real images, animated components, and automated quality checks.16-
TDQS
C2.8/5.0
Scored across 19 tools
Disambiguation2/5
Many legacy aliases (e.g., deploy, edit, generate) duplicate primary tools, creating confusion about which to use. Tools like create_project and generate_immersive_site have overlapping purposes, and agents may struggle to choose correctly.
Naming Consistency2/5
Primary tools use snake_case (create_project, deploy_project), but legacy aliases are single words (deploy, edit, list). This inconsistent naming pattern (camelCase is absent, but mixing verb forms and lengths) reduces predictability.
Tool Count3/5
With 19 tools, many are redundant aliases. The core set of about 11 unique tools is reasonable for project creation and deployment, but the extra aliases make the count feel bloated for the actual scope.
Completeness3/5
CRUD-like operations are partially covered: create, read, update (via edit), list. However, delete is missing, and there is no direct tool to update project metadata (only file edits). Billing is limited to a pricing URL. Notable gaps exist.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues