F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server exposing AI-powered GitHub PR review as tools.
5
-
github-devhub-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to github-devhub-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA MCP server that bridges LLMs with GitHub repository management, enabling automated analysis of pull requests, issue management, tag creation, and release management through natural language.536Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to perform GitHub operations (repos, issues, commits, PRs) via natural language, integrated with hosts like Antigravity.8-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-grade MCP server that provides LLMs with safe, structured, tool-based access to GitHub repositories, including issue management, semantic search, and guarded write operations.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that exposes GitHub operations as tools for AI agents, enabling code search, issue management, and PR review.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with GitHub via a fine-grained personal access token — pushing commits, managing branches, opening and merging PRs, creating issues, and reading repositories. It runs locally with no telemetry and supports a read-only mode.151MIT
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 17 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action—PRs, issues, repos, code search, CI, and AI analysis are cleanly separated. Even overlapping AI tools (summary vs review vs triage) have clearly defined different outputs.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_pr, create_issue, list_repos, summarize_pr) with domain prefixes. Minor exceptions like ci_status and health are noun phrases, but the overall pattern is consistent and predictable.
Tool Count4/5
17 tools is slightly above the ideal range, but each tool serves a distinct purpose in the GitHub + AI workflow. No redundant tools; the count feels intentional even if a bit heavy.
Completeness3/5
The surface is strong for reading and analyzing (repos, issues, PRs, code, CI) and supports creating issues and comments. However, there are no update/delete/merge operations for issues or PRs, leaving common management workflows incomplete.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues