Obsidian MCP Wrapper
Related Servers
Alternatives to Obsidian MCP Wrapper
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceGive Claude (and any MCP client) real agent access to your Obsidian vault — graph traversal, Dataview queries, daily-note awareness, and more.2522 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP connector that lets Claude read, write and search any Obsidian vault directly from disk.20MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides Claude with read, search, and write access to an Obsidian vault through MCP tools.10,054 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides semantic search capability over Obsidian vaults and exposes recent notes as resources to Claude through the MCP protocol.9-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceObsidian vault connector for Claude Desktop - enables reading and writing Markdown notes using Model Context Protocol (MCP)17 npm5-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA local MCP server that enables AI applications like Claude Desktop to securely access and work with Obsidian vaults, providing capabilities for reading notes, executing templates, and performing semantic searches.831MIT
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Multiple tools overlap in purpose: vault_search, strategy_search, find_note, and search_tables all appear to perform search-like operations with unclear distinctions. Similarly, get_entity_context, get_full_profile, and advisory_context all seem to provide contextual or profile information, making it difficult for an agent to choose the right tool.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (find_note, get_note_summary, read_section), but vault_search and advisory_context break this convention, and search_tables mixes the order. The inconsistency is moderate, not chaotic, but noticeable.
13 tools is well within the typical 3-15 range and seems appropriately scoped for an Obsidian wrapper covering search, retrieval, and basic note management. The number does not feel excessive or thin.
The tool set covers search and read operations comprehensively, but lacks an explicit update or edit tool. append_human_note may create or append, but there is no clear mechanism to modify existing notes, which leaves a notable gap for a note management server.