iikocloud-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to iikocloud-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for iiko restaurant management system REST API, providing 39 tools to manage products, employees, entities, documents, payments, reports, and raw API access.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA universal MCP server for registering internal, external, and OpenAPI-based APIs as MCP tools. It exposes them to MCP clients via Streamable HTTP and provides admin portal, RBAC/session auth, credential injection, and audit logging.Academic Free v1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA generic MCP server that dynamically converts OpenAPI-defined REST APIs into tools for LLMs like Claude. It supports multiple authentication methods and transport protocols, enabling seamless interaction with any OpenAPI-compliant API.18 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA single MCP server that fronts multiple REST APIs, each configured via environment variables, allowing Claude to orchestrate across several SaaS backends with namespaced tools.21MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server with HTTP/stdio support, a web admin panel for managing services, capabilities, and user permissions with Bearer token authentication, enabling relay and access control for MCP tools.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA production-grade multi-tenant MCP server that provides different tools and configurations to different clients using API key-based routing.1-
TDQS
Scored across 106 tools
Many tools are duplicated with two arg styles (e.g., dictionaries__get_cancel_causes vs dictionaries__get_cancel_causes_by_organization), making it hard to pick the right one. Customer lookup tools also overlap heavily, and deliveries_retrieve has several similar retrieval variants. Descriptions are detailed, but boundaries between many tools remain unclear.
Tools follow a consistent category__verb_noun snake_case pattern throughout (e.g., customers__get_customer_by_id, invoice_processing__list_inventory_writeoff_documents). Minor inconsistencies exist such as get_delivery_by_id vs get_deliveries_by_id and mixed singular/plural forms, but the overall convention is predictable and readable.
106 tools is far beyond a manageable MCP surface, and many are thin wrappers or duplicate variants of the same operation. Even for a broad iikoCloud API, this is an extreme count that will overwhelm an agent and increase misselection.
The toolset is overwhelmingly read-only: there are no create/update/delete tools for customers, orders, deliveries, menu, or webhooks, despite including operations__wait_command that references write-tools. Gaps like send_sms (only checks) and no mutation endpoints mean agents cannot complete lifecycle workflows. The read side is broad, but the surface is incomplete for real operations.