Skip to main content
Glama
Usama015

whoismd-mcp-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to whoismd-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for domain intelligence — WHOIS, DNS records, SSL certificate inspection, SPF/DMARC validation, security-header audits, and blacklist/reputation checks, callable by AI agents. Powered by domainintel.app; runs server-side, no local setup.
      7
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for DNS lookups, reverse DNS, WHOIS, and domain checks. Zero auth, zero config.
      5
      50 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to run and track scans, inspect quota usage, redeem existing studio report rights, and list or download generated reports through the associated REST API. It operates locally over stdio with API-key authentication and bounded retry/polling behavior.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying enterprise records and retention policies from any MCP client over stdio, with read-only tools for searching records, fetching retention verdicts, identifying archival candidates, summarizing departments, forecasting retentions, and viewing audit history.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly distinct: one handles a single domain lookup, the other handles batch processing of many domains. There is no ambiguity in their purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case with the same whoismd_ prefix: whoismd_lookup and whoismd_bulk. The naming is predictable and uniform.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server is quite thin for a domain intelligence service. While each tool is useful, the absence of operations like historical data, reverse WHOIS, or alerting makes the count feel borderline minimal.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers basic single and bulk lookups, but lacks other common domain intelligence operations such as historical WHOIS, reverse IP lookups, or real-time monitoring. These gaps may limit its usefulness for advanced workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues