Update queue settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true, so the description's mention of 'update' is consistent but adds no new behavioral context (e.g., what is overwritten, required permissions). The description does not contradict annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences: first states purpose, second clarifies parameter structure. No unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 5 parameters with full schema coverage and an output schema exists (though not shown), so the description doesn't need to explain return values. It adequately covers the core purpose, but could mention that previous settings are overwritten.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description adds that fields are 'flat, not nested' and lists a few field names, providing slight clarity but not compensating for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update posting queue configuration for a profile.' It uses a specific verb (update) and resource (queue settings), and lists the key fields, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_queue_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for updating queue settings but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. Sibling tools like get_queue_settings and preview_queue suggest different purposes but are not contrasted.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.