Update queue settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the mutation risk is known. The description adds a useful behavioral note about fields being flat rather than nested, but it does not disclose whether this is a full replacement or partial update, or what happens to existing queue configuration.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences, with the action and target front-loaded and no filler. The flat-format hint is valuable and earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the full schema coverage, output schema, and annotations, the description is largely sufficient. It could mention replacement semantics or how to fetch current settings, but the combination of schema and output schema covers most operational needs.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful guidance beyond the schema by explicitly telling the agent that fields are flat, not nested, and listing the exact fields (timezone, slots, days_of_week, max_posts_per_slot), which helps prevent the common mistake of trying a nested settings object.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the resource ('posting queue configuration for a profile'), and names the affected fields. It does not explicitly name sibling alternatives like get_queue_settings or preview_queue, but the verb distinguishes it from read-only siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used to modify queue settings, and the context of the sibling list makes that clear. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool instead of get_queue_settings or preview_queue, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.