forgejo-projects-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to forgejo-projects-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with a Forgejo instance as an authenticated user, supporting issues, pull requests, repositories, and notifications.118 npmMIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Forgejo repositories, issues, pull requests, files, commits, Actions workflow runs, organizations, and notifications through the Forgejo REST API using natural language.50MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to work a self-hosted kanban board as first-class users, exposing eleven kanban_* tools over a stateless Streamable HTTP endpoint for listing projects, stages, members and custom fields, and for creating, updating, moving and deleting tasks. Authenticates with bearer-token scopes so read-only or write access can be granted per agent, with every mutation audited.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive project management system that provides a full-featured Kanban board and dashboard accessible to AI agents. It enables agents to programmatically manage projects, tasks, and workflows through a suite of 13 specialized tools and 4 resource types.49 npm4-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to read repositories, manage issues, inspect CI/CD workflow runs, create branches, commit files, and open pull requests on a self-hosted Gitea instance.7MIT
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Planka-based Kanban boards, including managing boards, lists, cards, checklists, tasks, comments, and labels through an agent-friendly MCP interface.1314 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 31 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource and action (projects, columns, issues, milestones), and descriptions clarify boundaries between close/delete, remove/delete, and get/read. A few pairs—get_project vs read_project and add_issues_to_project vs create_issue with project_id—require careful reading but are ultimately distinguishable.
The dominant verb_noun pattern is clear (create/delete/list/close/reopen), but the set mixes synonyms: update_project vs edit_column/edit_milestone, get_project vs read_project, list_milestones vs read_milestone, plus the non-standard forgejo_status and authenticate. It remains readable but lacks a single consistent convention.
At 31 tools, the surface is heavy for a Forgejo project-management server; the rubric places 25+ in the too-many range. The count is inflated by bulk variants and several full-content read_* tools that could potentially be consolidated.
The surface covers auth, repositories, projects, columns, cards, and milestones with CRUD and lifecycle operations. However, there is no update_issue/edit_issue for title/body/state/assignees/labels after creation, and label and assignee management is absent, leaving a notable workflow gap.