Skip to main content
Glama
Unique Domains MCP server

Unique Domains MCP server

Official

Every dated launch phase of the ending, chronological

ud_list_tld_phases
Read-onlyIdempotent

Lists each dated launch phase for a TLD in chronological order, so you can answer when its sunrise or general availability opens.

Instructions

Every dated launch phase of the ending, chronological. Use it when someone asks when an ending opens, such as its sunrise or general availability dates. Pass tld (such as ai).

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "tld": "<tld>"
    },
    "name": "ud_list_tld_phases"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tldYesThe ending without the dot (`ai`), ASCII or `xn--` form; lowercased, a leading dot stripped.
fieldsNoComma-separated top-level keys to keep: id, phase, startsOn, endsOn, programLabel.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo
metaNoThe day of the answer, and the page cursor of a list.
linksNoLinks of the answer.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.4

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, and closed-world behavior. The description adds useful behavioral context by saying results cover every dated phase and are chronological, which is not in the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, with the main purpose in the first sentence and usage guidance immediately after. The first sentence nearly restates the title, and the `tld` example duplicates schema-level information, but there is little wasted text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple read-only listing tool with only two parameters, full schema descriptions, an output schema, and rich annotations. The description supplies the essential purpose, use case, ordering behavior, and required parameter example, so nothing critical is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already explains both `tld` and `fields`. The description only adds an example value for `tld` (`ai`), which is mildly helpful but largely redundant.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb-like outcome ('Every dated launch phase of the ending, chronological') and scope. It clearly distinguishes this from sibling tools about applications, changes, prices, and general TLD details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear when-to-use cue: 'when someone asks when an ending opens, such as its sunrise or general availability dates.' It does not name alternatives or exclusions, but the intended use case is explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.