get_multiple_doc_pages

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It mentions retrieving 'complete content' and batch capability, but lacks details on permissions, rate limits, response format, or error handling. For a tool with no annotation coverage, this is insufficient behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, with two sentences that efficiently convey purpose and usage. Every sentence adds value without redundancy, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (batch retrieval), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It covers basic purpose and usage but lacks details on behavior, response format, and error handling, which are crucial for effective tool invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the parameter 'pages' well-documented in the schema. The description adds minimal value beyond the schema by implying batch retrieval of documentation content, but does not provide additional semantic context about parameter usage or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Get the complete content of multiple UniVoucher documentation pages at once.' It specifies the verb ('Get'), resource ('documentation pages'), and scope ('multiple'), but does not explicitly differentiate from its sibling 'get_doc_page' beyond implying batch capability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides implied usage guidance: 'Useful when you need comprehensive information across multiple related topics.' This suggests a batch use case but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus 'get_doc_page' or other siblings, nor does it mention exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.