CONTINUUM
Related Servers
Alternatives to CONTINUUM
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA causally-ordered, rewindable event-ledger for autonomous AI agents, enabling tamper-evident audit, replay, and rollback of agent actions via an MCP server.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceTamper-evident audit logging for AI agents. Append-only, hash-chained, optionally Ed25519-signed log. The MCP server lets an agent keep and verify a record of what it actually did.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first MCP server that lets AI agents query their own LLM call history as a branchable DAG and offload conversation context into immutable, AES-256-GCM-encrypted capsules — restorable in full or per segment, crypto-shreddable, with RAID-style replication. 12 tools, no API keys, no cloud.78 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-agent observability server whose distinguishing feature is a SHA-256 hash-chained, tamper-evident audit log with chain verification and signed export. Works with Claude Desktop, Cursor, and any MCP client.222 npm25MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes governance, trust-scoring, compliance, guardrail, cost, drift, and supply-chain scanning tools and resources to any MCP client over stdio, Streamable HTTP, or legacy HTTP+SSE. It lets agents route every tool call through a deterministic five-way decision (allow, redact, require approval, deny, or quarantine) with hash-chained evidence, human approval workflows, and in-agent trust gates for LangChain, LangGraph, and Google ADK.30-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceUniversal governance layer for AI agents — MCP-native, fail-closed, LNN interpretability. Governed receipts, IPFS audit proofs, and rollback for any agent in any framework.378 npmApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
The side-effect tools have clearly separated roles, as do resume, validate, and confirm. The main ambiguity is among record_progress, record_plan, record_summary, and checkpoint: their purposes differ, but their recommended calling points can coincide, leaving uncertainty about whether multiple calls are expected.
Every tool uses the same continuum_ prefix and snake_case convention. Names are verb-led or naturally verbal, with consistent action-oriented terminology across the side-effect lifecycle.
Thirteen tools is well suited to the combined scope of durable run recovery and safe external side effects. Each tool supports a distinct lifecycle step without obvious redundancy or unnecessary expansion.
The surface covers run state capture, planning, checkpointing, validation, confirmation, and resumption. It also provides a closed side-effect lifecycle from interception through completion or failure, reconciliation of uncertain outcomes, compensation, and inspection.