cortex
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@cortexsearch the vault for notes on project Phoenix"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
cortex
A self-hosted brain for a household or a team: a dashboard where people chat with each other and with an agent that has read their shared notes — on your own model, on your own machine.
Status: alpha. The API and config surface are settling; expect breaking
changes between minor versions. The index and checkpoint formats are
disposable caches — deleting .cortex/ loses conversations, never notes.
pip install cortxai
cortex setup # wizard: brain dir, model endpoint, admin account
cortex serve --host 0.0.0.0 # dashboard on :8642Or bash install.sh (pipx/uv/venv autodetect), or docker compose up after
the one-time cortex setup /brain documented in docker-compose.yml.
What it does not do: cortex hosts no model — you bring an endpoint: Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, a LiteLLM proxy, OpenRouter, or the Anthropic API. Vector search is exact cosine in-process, right for personal- and team-sized brains, wrong for millions of chunks. Vault edits are last-writer-wins with conflict detection (a 409 and a banner), not git-grade merging. The calendar connector expands no recurrence rules yet.
The dashboard
Today — the default view and the reason to open it: what is on today, a few open tasks you can tick straight from the list, what changed, and anything you wrote on this date in earlier years. Computed without the model, so it answers instantly and works on a brain with no model configured at all. It is deliberately bounded — a handful of tasks and then "that is everything for today", never a growing pile of everything you have not done.
Capture — press c anywhere. One line, Enter, and it lands in today's daily note. Also
cortex note "..."from a terminal, and the agent can do it for you. Filing is optional; search does not care which note a line is in.Search — hybrid full-text and vector search over everything you can read, with / from anywhere. Below the direct hits come the notes and files the brain's graph connects to them, each saying why (
↳ links to garden.md).Chat — private threads with the agent. It searches before it answers, streams its tool calls (⚙
search_brain… ✓ 33ms), and cites files by path; clicking a citation opens it in the vault view. It also remembers what you discussed: "as we said last week" makes it search your past conversations, and the sidebar searches them too.Channels — peer chat for the people on the brain. Mention
@cortexand the agent answers in-channel, reading only the shared vault — never anyone's personal vault.Vault — shared and personal vaults, edited in the browser with Obsidian-flavored rendering:
[[wikilinks]],![[embeds]],> [!note]callouts, frontmatter, task checkboxes that write through,#tags. Ctrl-S saves; a concurrent edit gets a conflict banner, not a silent clobber.Import — bring an existing Obsidian vault as a zip upload, a git URL, or a server path.
.obsidian/,.git/and non-vault file types are skipped.Code — repositories the brain can read, and scheduled reviews of them (below).
Settings (admins) — three sections: Extend (skills, connectors, plugins, MCP servers, templates), Automation (rules and scheduled jobs, below), and Admin (accounts, index and model health, a way to re-index without a terminal).
The agent can write, narrowly: it can add a line to today's note, tick a task by exact path and line, and save a web page as markdown. There is no general "write any file" tool — on a vault with no version control, the narrowness is the safety property.
Accounts are username + password (scrypt), sessions are HttpOnly cookies. Each user sees the shared vault, their own vault, and connector sources — search, grep, and the agent are scoped per request, filtered inside the query rather than trimmed after it.
Related MCP server: claudecode-mcp
The agent stack
LangGraph's ReAct agent over LangChain chat models, with conversation state
in an AsyncSqliteSaver checkpoint per thread:
providers:
local:
kind: openai # Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio — one wire
base_url: "http://localhost:11434/v1"
chat_model: qwen3
embed_model: nomic-embed-text
router:
kind: openrouter # cloud aggregator, OpenAI wire
api_key_env: OPENROUTER_API_KEY
chat_model: anthropic/claude-sonnet-5
claude:
kind: anthropic # direct Anthropic Messages API
api_key_env: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
chat_model: claude-sonnet-5
roles:
chat: router
embed: localA LiteLLM proxy is kind: litellm with its base_url — its routing and
fallback policy stays in the proxy, so cortex carries no LiteLLM SDK.
Endpoints are classified by network facts: private, loopback, CGNAT and
Tailscale addresses are trusted; anything public gets a plain warning that
your notes will leave the network.
Retrieval is hybrid: SQLite FTS5 and vector cosine ranked separately, fused with reciprocal rank fusion, nudged by recency — the design from Cerebras' knowledge base. The index rebuilds from scratch when the chunk schema or embedding model changes, because silently mixing vector spaces is corruption. No embedding endpoint means full-text search that says so, not fake vector scores.
Subagents
Five sources to read, four files to review, three questions to research:
one agent doing them in sequence fills its context with the first before
it reaches the last. delegate hands each part to a subagent that runs at
the same time (up to four per call, three at once, a shorter loop than the
parent's) and reports back; the parent sees one answer per task and
decides what to keep. Children read and search with the parent's tools
and the parent's scope, and cannot write, remember or delegate — what
gets kept is decided in front of the person. The deep-research skill fans
its queries out this way. The shape is Hermes Agent's delegate_task.
The graph
Search finds the passage that matches the words. It does not know that the note it found links to three others, that the function it found is called from two files that never say its name, or that the file it found changed in the same commit as another six times this month. Those relations are how a person moves from a hit to the thing they wanted, so the brain keeps them as a graph beside the index:
notes —
[[wikilinks]], markdown links,#tagscode — imports resolved inside the repository, definitions, and which files use a symbol another file defines
history — files that changed in the same commit, from
git logshape — which directory holds what
It is the structural half of the GraphRAG / LightRAG / HippoRAG design,
extracted deterministically: no model call between saving a note and
searching it, milliseconds per file, and every edge is a reason a person
can check. It shows up in three places: search pulls in one hop of
neighbours below the direct hits with a via that says why; the agent has
related (what a file links to, imports, uses, changed with) and
find_symbol (where a name is defined and used); and the Vault shows a
Connections panel under every note and source file.
Things it does without being asked
Rules file notes for you. A rule matches on path, tag, frontmatter, content or age, then moves, tags or archives. Because this moves your writing, the shape is constrained on purpose:
there is no delete action, and there will not be one
preview is free and comes first — you see which note goes where before anything moves
every change is logged, so "where did my note go" always has an answer
Jobs are the clock: sync a connector, re-index, run the rules, write today's digest into a note, post it into a channel, or review a repository. Intervals are hours in plain words rather than cron, and each job says what it is: "apply the tidying rules daily". Both ship a set of ready-made suggestions, all switched off until you read one and turn it on.
Two things deliberately absent. There is no "ask the model something and notify me" job — every job is declared, and the one that runs the model, the code review, has a declared input (this repo, these commits) and an output a person approves line by line. And a channel digest with nothing in it posts nothing, just as a review with no new commits writes nothing: a scheduled "nothing to report" is what teaches people to ignore the channel it arrives in.
Code: repos the brain can read, and reviews it writes
Add a GitHub or GitLab repository in the Code tab — owner/name or its
URL, a branch if not the default — and cortex keeps a shallow clone under
.cortex/repos/, refreshes it on an interval, and indexes it under
code/<name>/. From then on the agent searches your notes and your code
together: search_brain finds both, read_file opens
code/cortex/src/cortex/jobs.py, and list_repos, repo_tree, repo_log
and repo_diff give it what git knows. Every repo you add is readable by
everyone on the brain; adding it is the decision to share it.
A private repository needs a token. A repo names the environment variable
that holds it (GITHUB_TOKEN or GITLAB_TOKEN by default), and the
variable comes from the shell or from a .env beside cortex.yaml,
which cortex loads on start — the same file serves api_key_env for a
model provider:
# ~/brain/.env
GITHUB_TOKEN=github_pat_…
GITLAB_TOKEN=glpat-…
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=sk-or-…The token reaches git as a per-host header, never in argv and never in
the clone's .git/config. cortex repos add owner/name does the same from
a terminal.
Scheduled reviews are jobs of a new kind. Pick a repo, an interval, what
to look for ("error handling and anything that touches auth"), and
optionally a channel. On each run the agent syncs the repo, takes the diff
since the commit it last reviewed, pulls context from the brain — the
project's conventions, earlier reviews, the worklog — and writes
reviews/<repo>-<date>.md in the shared vault, with one line per finding:
- [ ] **F1 · unchecked return** — high · `src/pay.py:41` — the result is dropped…That is the approval loop cortex already had: a person ticks the findings
an agent may act on, approved_findings lists them, record_work closes
them. The reviewer cannot tick its own boxes — the note is written by code
from the model's answer, and ticks are stripped on the way in. A run with
no new commits writes nothing; the first run of a repo looks at the whole
codebase once. Reviews of a repo also work in Chat ("review the last three
commits of cortex"); the code-review skill in the library spells out the
procedure.
Research: the agent on the web
Two tools, web_search and fetch_url, and three library skills that use
them: web-lookup for a fact with a source, deep-research for a question
that deserves several searches, cross-checked and written up under
research/, and code-review above. Search needs a backend, and the
self-hosted one comes first: set CORTEX_SEARCH_URL to a
SearXNG instance (with format: json
enabled), or BRAVE_SEARCH_API_KEY for the Brave Search API. With neither
set it falls back to DuckDuckGo's HTML endpoint, which needs no key and can
break without notice — when it does, the tool says so rather than answering
"nothing found".
Four ways to extend it
Extension | Contract | Runs |
Tool plugin |
| agent time |
MCP server |
| agent time |
Skill |
| on demand |
Connector |
|
|
A broken extension is reported and isolated, never fatal. Registration is not authorization: a tool that touches something sensitive keeps its own checks inside the callable.
It writes its own skills. When the agent has just worked out a
multi-step way of doing something, it saves the procedure with
save_skill so next time is one call, and when a skill's instructions let
it down it fixes them. The idea comes from Hermes Agent's learning loop;
the two lines cortex adds are that the brain signs what it writes
(author: cortex, shown as written by the brain on the Extend page, with
how often each skill is used) and never rewrites a skill a person wrote —
for those it says what should change and the person edits. In Chat,
Turn this into a skill asks it to write down what it just did.
Manage them from the dashboard. The admin-only Extend panel lists
every plugin, skill, connector and MCP server with what it provides, its
load error if it has one, and an enable toggle that never edits your source
file. Skills and connectors also carry a library of ready-made ones you
add in a click — six skills and an RSS connector ship — because most people
want the one that already does the thing, not a blank editor. You can write a plugin or connector in the browser: it is loaded
before it is saved, so code that will not import is refused with the
loader's own message instead of silently breaking the next turn, and a
successful save rebuilds the agent so the new tool is live without a
restart. Connectors get a settings box and a "Run now" button; MCP servers
get a form. Servers defined in cortex.yaml show up read-only — the file
stays the owner of what it declares.
Saving a plugin or connector runs that code on the server as the cortex
user. That is the same trust level as configuring a stdio MCP server, and it
is why the panel is admin-only. From the terminal, cortex ext list,
cortex ext disable plugin <name>, and cortex ext delete do the same
management without the browser.
Cortex is also an MCP server —
claude mcp add home-brain -- cortex mcp --brain ~/brain gives Claude Code,
Cursor, or Hermes the same tool registry, at box-owner scope.
Layout of a brain
~/brain/
├── cortex.yaml # providers, roles, mcp servers, connectors
├── vaults/shared/ # everyone's notes
├── vaults/<user>/ # each user's private vault
├── sources/ # connector output
├── skills/ plugins/ connectors/
├── .env # tokens: GITHUB_TOKEN, an api_key_env… (gitignored)
└── .cortex/ # index, checkpoints, repo clones — disposable cacheBack it up by copying the folder. Home brain, company brain, club brain:
three folders, three cortex serve processes.
cortex note "the boiler service is due in March" # capture, from anywhere
cortex today # what is on
cortex clip https://example.com/recipe # save a page as markdown
cortex repos add Unchained-Labs/cortex # let the brain read a repo
cortex demo # example notes for an empty brain
cortex service install # keep it running across rebootsAn empty brain cannot help you, so cortex setup offers to import an
existing vault, indexes what it finds, and cortex demo seeds a few
obviously-fake example notes you can delete in one command.
Observability
Every model and tool call appends JSONL to .cortex/usage.jsonl with
prompt_tokens/completion_tokens when the endpoint reports them — absent
counts stay absent rather than becoming zeros, which is what
preflight expects for
calibration. Telemetry never makes a call fail.
Development
uv venv --python 3.12 && uv pip install -e '.[dev]'
.venv/bin/pytest # 329 tests
.venv/bin/ruff check src tests
cd web && npm install && npm run dev # SPA dev server, proxies to :8642The frontend contract lives in docs/product-spec.md; cutting a release is RELEASING.md.
Docs: unchained-labs.github.io/cortex · Brand: Unchained-Labs/branding · License: MIT
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for progressive tool usage at any scale (see https://klavis.ai)
Nifty's MCP server — exposes tasks, projects, messages, and files as tools for AI agents.
- UnifAPIOAuthcom.unifapi
Hosted MCP server for live public-data APIs and Skills for AI agents.
Hosted MCP server connecting claude.ai, ChatGPT and other AI apps to your own computer
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that transforms Claude-style skills and resources into callable tools for any MCP-compatible agent or client. It automatically discovers, exposes, and executes scripts from skills organized in local directories or packaged archives.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal MCP server that wraps the headless Claude Code CLI as MCP tools, providing stateless access to Claude's coding capabilities through prompt-based interactions. It enables users to execute Claude Code commands with various prompt formats and structured outputs directly from MCP clients.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover and execute tools via a secure MCP server with JWT authentication, RBAC, rate limiting, and audit logging.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA self-hostable MCP server that turns a folder of skills into callable tools via MCP and REST APIs.2MIT