E-Nabız MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to E-Nabız MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityBmaintenanceA local-first, model-agnostic MCP server that stores personal health data in a SQLite file and provides analysis-ready views for any AI client to log, retrieve, and reason over health records.79MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server that provides read-only access to Google Health API v4, enabling analysis of personal health data via OpenAI Responses API or ChatGPT.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server that enables AI agents to read user-authorized Google Health API v4 data from Fitbit, Pixel Watch, and partners via OAuth, with tokens never leaving the machine.26372 npm57MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables LLMs to query Apple Health data such as steps, heart rate, sleep, and workouts via natural language, with secure cloud access through OAuth.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn educational healthcare assistant MCP server that provides medication information, interaction checks, symptom guidance, and health topic searches using local data and a local LLM.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables LLMs to securely query synthetic clinical data through validated, scoped tools (patient summaries, conditions, medications, lab trends, encounters) while maintaining audit logs and access controls.-
TDQS
Scored across 32 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting specific health record types or actions (e.g., listing vs. getting details for lab, radiology, prescriptions). No two tools are ambiguous; even similar tools like enabiz_list_prescriptions and enabiz_list_medications differ in scope (prescriptions vs. individual medication usage).
All tools follow a consistent 'enabiz_verb_noun' pattern using snake_case. Verbs like 'list_', 'get_', 'download_', 'login_', and 'session_' are used uniformly. The only slight deviation is 'enabiz_download_document' using 'download' instead of 'get', but this is justified as it downloads a file rather than returning data.
32 tools is on the higher end but appropriate for a comprehensive healthcare portal covering numerous data types (e.g., diagnoses, medications, lab, radiology, allergies, etc.). The count is not overwhelming given the domain's breadth; each tool serves a specific, non-redundant function.
The server provides comprehensive read-only access to nearly all health record categories (e.g., diagnoses, medications, lab, radiology, vaccinations, allergies, reports). Minor gaps include no update/create capabilities and no cross-document search, but these are expected for a patient-facing MCP focused on data retrieval.