Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Looker MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an OAuth-protected, scoped, and audited MCP server that lets AI assistants safely query business data through a fixed set of tools without direct database access.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to query Google Analytics 4 data through standard MCP interfaces, supporting real-time data, custom reports, and metadata discovery.
      5
      35 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with and manage Google Cloud Platform resources including Artifact Registry, BigQuery, Cloud Build, Compute Engine, Cloud Run, Cloud Storage, and monitoring services through a standardized MCP interface.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to query and analyze Google Analytics 4 data through standard MCP interfaces, supporting service account and OAuth2 authentication.
      5
      55 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query live schema, lineage, and query-context across data warehouses, dbt projects, orchestration systems, and BI tools via MCP tools.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 33 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource (dashboard, look, query, explore, model, database, health, content, user). Even similar-sounding tools like query and run_query have clear differences: query requires a new definition, run_query uses an existing ID. No two tools are ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_models, create_dashboard, run_look). Minor exceptions include the bare verb 'query' and the single-word 'whoami', but these are negligible and do not hinder readability.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 33 tools, the server exceeds the calibration threshold for 'too many' (>25). While the broad scope may justify a large surface, the number feels heavy and could overwhelm an agent, especially when many tools are for metadata exploration that might be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers all major Looker workflows: CRUD for dashboards and looks, query execution, exploring models/explores, database metadata, health checks, and content validation. Minor gaps like missing update/delete for dashboard elements and lack of user management are acceptable given the server's focus.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive