GLPI MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to GLPI MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage GLPI inventory, tickets, and CIA security fields via its REST API.98 npm1ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to GLPI IT Service Management, enabling ticket management, asset search, and ITIL processes via natural language.5 npm4MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to GLPI service desks so they can manage tickets, ITIL objects (problems and changes), assets, knowledge base articles, users, rules and webhooks through natural language. Works with GLPI 10 and 11 via REST API v1 and the GLPI 11 API v2, with read-only and delete guards, idempotent creates, and support for both local (stdio/HTTP) and hosted OAuth deployments.1111MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to GLPI through the Model Context Protocol, enabling management of tickets, ITIL objects, assets, projects, tasks, documents, sessions, entities and massive actions via the legacy REST API. It supports GLPI 10 and 11 with safe defaults such as read-only mode, disabled destructive operations and masked secrets.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceMCP server allowing an AI assistant to interact directly with your GLPI instance via its REST API, enabling ticket management, knowledge base operations, and statistics.404-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with GLPI (ITSM) through 71 tools covering tickets, assets, problems, changes, knowledge base, projects, users, and more, using SSE or stdio transport.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 52 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with resource+action naming that separates e.g. list_tickets vs search_tickets and profile vs group visibility tools. A few tools (stats_by_*) follow similar patterns but target different metrics, so confusion is unlikely.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_tickets, add_followup, update_supplier), with only minor deviations like stats_resolution_time and kill_session. No mixed conventions are present.
52 tools is far above the typical 3–15 range; while GLPI is a broad domain, the granular CRUD for each entity could be consolidated. The count is excessive and likely burdens tool selection.
Core ticketing, followups, tasks, and KB articles have near-complete lifecycles, but there are notable gaps: no list/get for contacts and contracts, no update/delete for solutions, no asset/problem/change management, and KB category CRUD is missing. These gaps limit the server's coverage of GLPI.