Skip to main content
Glama
U-C4N

Thunderbird MCP

by U-C4N
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Thunderbird MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Thunderbird MCP

      static9
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to work directly with a local Thunderbird client, providing roughly 40 tools to search and read mail, compose, reply and forward messages, manage folders, filters, contacts, calendars, events and tasks. Write operations open a review window by default, so nothing is sent or created without the user's confirmation.
      1
      -

    • Thunderbird MCP

      MebwayCompany
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with full access to Thunderbird email, compose, filters, calendar, and contacts via the Model Context Protocol.
      1
      -

    • aiconnect

      guuslangelaar0
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI tools and shells to read, organize, and automate Thunderbird mail locally via MCP, with tools for accounts, folders, messages, rules, and archiving.
      MIT

    • Thunderbird MCP

      bitswype
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a Model Context Protocol interface for Mozilla Thunderbird, allowing AI assistants to manage emails, filters, calendars, and contacts. It exposes 24 tools for tasks like searching messages, drafting replies, and organizing folders through a local bridge.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 50 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The prefix scheme (mail_, folder_, search_, tb_) cleanly separates domains, and the most easily confused pairs (mail_search vs search_global, folder_move vs folder_copy, mail_delete vs mail_archive) are explicitly distinguished in their descriptions. A few noun-vs-verb neighbors (mail_get/folder_get, tb_status/tb_diagnostics) overlap slightly, but boundaries are generally clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly everything follows a predictable prefix_verb_noun snake_case pattern (mail_search, folder_create, search_saved_delete, tb_restart). Minor deviations exist where the suffix is a noun rather than a verb (tb_events, tb_console, mail_tags), but the prefix grouping keeps it highly readable.

    Tool Count2/5

    50 tools is heavy for any single server; the domain is genuinely broad (mail, folders, search, compose, tags, diagnostics), so most tools earn their place, but there is consolidation opportunity (e.g. mail_get vs mail_get_many, the four search_saved_* tools, folder_empty_trash vs folder_empty_junk). It sits above the comfortable range.

    Completeness5/5

    Coverage is remarkably thorough: search (full-text, global, saved, conversation), message read/attachment handling, full folder CRUD plus favorites/sync/compact/empty, tag management, and the full compose lifecycle (send, reply, forward, draft, open, outbox status), plus diagnostics. No obvious dead ends in the mail-client domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources