No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 123 tools
Many tools have heavily overlapping purposes: add_extruded_profile vs add_extruded_profile_on_plane vs add_extruded_profile_on_face vs extrude_sketch, add_hole vs add_counterbore_hole vs add_hole_wizard vs add_hole_on_face, cut_profile vs cut_sketch, add_swept_pipe vs add_swept_profile vs swept_region, and a dense pro_visualize_* / preview / shot-pack cluster. Descriptions are repetitive boilerplate ('...through the independent native SOLIDWORKS engine') that does little to differentiate similar tools. An agent would frequently misselect among near-duplicate geometry and rendering tools.
Most tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern, but there is a clear split between native tools and a separate 'pro_' prefixed family, plus several noun-first or bare names (screenshot, export, rebuild, swept_region, loft_sketches). The convention is readable but not uniform across the whole set.
123 tools is far beyond any reasonable agent-facing surface, and the count is inflated by many marginal variants (on_plane/on_face counterparts, hole variants, numerous pro_visualize_* entries). This is an extreme mismatch for practical tool selection.
Coverage is very broad: sketching, solids, features, assemblies, mates, drawings, export, rendering, validation, diagnostics, and operation polling are all present. Minor gaps are hard to identify given the surface, but the lifecycle is largely covered with few dead ends.