Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linear MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with Linear workspaces by listing, retrieving, creating, and searching issues, and listing teams via the Linear GraphQL API.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.
      11
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with Linear's API to manage issues, projects, and teams. Supports creating, updating, searching, and deleting issues, along with project management and team operations through API key authentication.
      13
      276 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with Linear's issue tracking system, including creating, updating, searching issues, adding comments, and accessing resources via the Linear API.
      788 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting different resources: tasks (details vs. list), teams, and users. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and plural/singular nouns as appropriate (e.g., get_task_details, get_tasks). The naming is predictable and uniform throughout the set.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a project management domain like Linear, which typically involves CRUD operations on tasks, issues, or other entities. While the tools cover basic read operations, the count is borderline low for the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete, covering only read operations (get) with no ability to create, update, or delete tasks, teams, or users. This creates significant gaps that will cause agent failures in typical project management workflows, such as modifying task status or assigning users.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues