Linear MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Linear MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Linear workspaces by listing, retrieving, creating, and searching issues, and listing teams via the Linear GraphQL API.2 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables reading and managing Linear issues by human-readable ID, with tools for searching, creating, updating, commenting, and resolving teams, states, labels, and assignees by name.11-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with Linear's API to manage issues, projects, and teams. Supports creating, updating, searching, and deleting issues, along with project management and team operations through API key authentication.13276 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to interact with Linear's issue tracking system, including creating, updating, searching issues, adding comments, and accessing resources via the Linear API.788 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAllows LLMs to integrate with Linear's issue tracking system, enabling them to create, update, search, and comment on issues through the Linear API.788 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI tools like Cline to manage Linear issues, projects, and teams via the Linear API.241,466 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting different resources: tasks (details vs. list), teams, and users. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and plural/singular nouns as appropriate (e.g., get_task_details, get_tasks). The naming is predictable and uniform throughout the set.
With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a project management domain like Linear, which typically involves CRUD operations on tasks, issues, or other entities. While the tools cover basic read operations, the count is borderline low for the apparent scope.
The toolset is severely incomplete, covering only read operations (get) with no ability to create, update, or delete tasks, teams, or users. This creates significant gaps that will cause agent failures in typical project management workflows, such as modifying task status or assigning users.