Skip to main content
Glama
Typus-Lab

typus-perp-mcp

Official
by Typus-Lab

Related Servers

Alternatives to typus-perp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server for the Sui blockchain that enables AI agents to manage accounts, execute token swaps, and perform smart contract development using the Sui CLI. It supports over 30 tools for DeFi operations, staking, and market data via Pyth price oracles.
      10 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Hyperliquid decentralized exchange, enabling AI assistants to perform trading operations, manage accounts, and retrieve market data.
      307 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for Aster DEX perpetual futures trading, enabling AI agents to access real-time market data, perform institutional-grade analysis, execute orders, and run automated trading strategies.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: user staking vs pool info, order creation vs cancellation, collateral management, and the multi-step unstake/redeem/claim flow are all clearly separated. Even similar-sounding tools like unstake and unstake_redeem have explicit descriptions that delineate their purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (get_markets, create_order, increase_collateral), but a few are bare verbs (unstake, claim, swap) or compound verbs (mint_stake_lp, unstake_redeem). This is a minor deviation from the otherwise consistent convention.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 19 tools, the set is slightly heavy but each tool earns its place given the dual domains of perpetuals trading and TLP staking/LP management. The count is justifiable for the breadth of operations covered.

    Completeness4/5

    Core workflows are well-covered: order lifecycle, position collateral management, staking/unstaking/redeeming/claiming, and swaps. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit wallet balance tool to check free TLP or token holdings, but these can be worked around via user-supplied information or external chain queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues