Skip to main content
Glama
TwitterAPIs

twitterapis

by TwitterAPIs

twitter_dm_list

Read-only

Lists your authenticated account's Direct Message conversations, providing participant info and conversation_id for reading messages. Read-only: does not send DMs.

Instructions

List YOUR authenticated account's Direct Message conversations (inbox), each with the participant and a conversation_id you can pass to twitter_dm_conversation. Requires an authenticated session behind your key. Read-only: this does not send DMs.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ct0NoOptional. The account's ct0 cookie, paired with auth_token. Sent as the x-ct0 header.
proxy_urlNoOptional. Residential proxy URL to egress this call through. Recommended for writes: X soft-blocks writes from datacenter IPs as automated. Sent as the x-proxy-url header.
auth_tokenNoOptional. The account's auth_token cookie, to act AS that account for this call (must be paired with ct0). Sent as the x-auth-token header; never placed in the URL.
user_agentNoOptional. User-Agent string to send for this session. Sent as the x-user-agent header.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false. Description reinforces with 'Read-only: this does not send DMs' and adds authentication requirement, which is useful beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, concise and front-loaded. Every sentence adds value: first states purpose and output, second clarifies read-only nature and prerequisite.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple list tool with annotations, description is complete: states what it returns (participant and conversation_id), usage context, and connection to sibling tool. No output schema needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema provides for the parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states it lists your authenticated account's DM conversations (inbox), providing participant and conversation_id. It distinguishes from sibling twitter_dm_conversation by mentioning the conversation_id can be passed to that tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Includes prerequisite: requires an authenticated session behind your key. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but the context is clear for listing DMs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TwitterAPIs/twitterapis-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server