stop
Halts audio playback in REAPER, immediately stopping all sound output during mixing or production sessions.
Instructions
Stop playback in REAPER.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Halts audio playback in REAPER, immediately stopping all sound output during mixing or production sessions.
Stop playback in REAPER.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.7.3Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose state after stopping (e.g., playhead remains, project state) or contrast with pausing, which is critical for a playback control tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single short sentence, front-loaded, no waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no parameters, output schema, or annotations, the description is minimal. It lacks behavioral context such as whether stopping resets play position or how it differs from 'pause', leaving the agent to infer.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Zero parameters, so baseline is 4. No parameter semantics to explain.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb ('Stop') and resource ('playback in REAPER'), distinguishing it from siblings like 'pause' and 'play'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when playback should be stopped, but does not explicitly compare with alternatives like 'pause' or specify when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.