Skip to main content
Glama

create_moment_load

Apply a moment load to a vertex or reference point in an Abaqus model for a specified analysis step.

Instructions

Create a moment load on a vertex or reference point.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYes
momentYes
timeoutNo
step_nameYes
model_nameNoModel-1
region_nameYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full behavioral burden. 'Create' implies mutation, and the target location is stated, but there is no disclosure of side effects, overwrite behavior, units, or required context. This is a thin behavioral picture for a mutating operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with zero filler. The core action and target are front-loaded, and every word contributes to the meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with six parameters, no annotations, and zero schema descriptions, one sentence is not enough. Missing details like moment component order, units, which parameters correspond to which entities, and how the load is attached to a step leave the agent to guess.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only weakly hints at region_name by mentioning 'vertex or reference point.' It does not explain the moment array's three component meanings, step_name semantics, model_name default behavior, or timeout usage, so the parameter burden is mostly unmet.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Create'), a specific resource ('moment load'), and a target ('on a vertex or reference point'). The tool is clearly distinguishable from force/pressure load siblings by type, though it does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use a moment load rather than a concentrated force, pressure load, or other load type. It does not mention prerequisites, coordinate system expectations, or exclusions, so an agent gets no decision support beyond the action itself.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools