Skip to main content
Glama
TuTouPower

kimi-acp-mcp

by TuTouPower
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to kimi-acp-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Kimi MCP Server

      MichaelCecil
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP bridge that enables Claude Code to consult the Kimi AI model in a structured challenge-loop for code review, debugging, and architecture evaluation.
      18 npm
      2
      MIT

    • Kimi MCP Server

      x51xxx
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges MCP clients to Moonshot AI's Kimi Code CLI, enabling file analysis, brainstorming, batch tasks, code reviews, and session management within editors like Claude Desktop and Cursor.
      14
      744 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Herald

      kOlapsis
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      The self-hosted MCP bridge between Claude Chat and Claude Code.
      46
      AGPL 3.0

    • harness-bridge

      rbutera
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Bridges Claude Code and OpenAI Codex through MCP, allowing cross-harness querying, code review, explanation, and implementation delegation.
      6
      6 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools serve entirely different purposes: one lists sessions, the other checks status. There is no overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools share the 'kimi_' prefix and follow a noun pattern ('sessions', 'status'), which is consistent. However, the lack of a verb-noun pattern is a minor deviation.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels too thin for its apparent domain of session management, which typically requires more operations.

    Completeness2/5

    The server provides listing and status checking but lacks essential operations like creating, loading, or deleting sessions, leaving significant gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources