Skip to main content
Glama
TsvetanG2

cognigy-ai-mcp-management-server

Related Servers

Alternatives to cognigy-ai-mcp-management-server

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables document ingestion and typed knowledge graph queries through Claude MCP tools, allowing agents to extract, store, and retrieve typed entities and relations from documents.
    2
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    D
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A foundation for building custom local Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that provide tools accessible to AI assistants like Cursor or Claude Desktop.
    1
    37
    MIT
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server exposing 58 online tools (crypto, data, image, text, etc.) and workflow execution, enabling MCP clients like Claude Desktop to invoke them via natural language.
    58
    10 npm
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
    8 npm
    -
  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables Claude users to access specialized OpenAI agents (web search, file search, computer actions) and a multi-agent orchestrator through the MCP protocol.
    4
    10
    -

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 138 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but several pairs overlap noticeably (e.g., score_utterance vs generate_nlu_scores both score utterances against NLU intents; create_package, package_snapshot, and promote_snapshot all package resources). Descriptions help, but with 138 tools the agent can still misselect among similar-sounding operations.

Naming Consistency5/5

Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_flows, get_node, create_intent, delete_knowledge_store). Minor variations like get_nodes vs get_node are natural, and no mixed conventions appear.

Tool Count1/5

138 tools far exceeds reasonable bounds for an agent-facing server, even given Cognigy.AI's broad platform. This extreme count creates a high cognitive load and increases selection errors, matching the rubric's 50+ tools criterion for an extreme mismatch.

Completeness3/5

Coverage is broad across many resources (NLU, knowledge, contacts, snapshots, packages, functions, LLMs), but notable gaps exist: no create_flow/update_flow/delete_flow, no create_endpoint/update_endpoint/delete_endpoint, and no update_flow_settings. These missing core CRUD operations for central resources limit end-to-end management workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues