A
licenseNot graded
qualityB
maintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that gives AI coding assistants direct shell access to your local machine, enabling execution of arbitrary bash commands for development workflows.
2,994 npm
-
jan-terminal-mcp
by Trigodil
Related Servers
Alternatives to jan-terminal-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI clients to execute shell, Python, and Node commands on the local machine across platforms.31MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for developers providing file operations, shell execution, git integration, and smart caching to enhance AI-assisted development.119 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA self-hosted MCP server that gives ChatGPT full local machine access for coding tasks, including file editing, shell commands, git operations, and project exploration via 40+ MCP tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal MCP server enabling Codex and ChatGPT to read/write files, execute commands, manage processes, use Git, and inspect images on the user's machine with full privileges.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that allows AI assistants like Claude to execute terminal commands on the user's computer and return the output, functioning like a terminal through AI.89-
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 10 tools
Disambiguation2/5
The run_* family is heavily overlapping: run_code, run_python, and run_cpp all execute code, with run_python and run_cpp being subsets of run_code. run_file and run_shell also blur boundaries, making it easy to select the wrong tool.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern (read_file, write_file, list_dir, edit_file, run_code, etc.). The single exception is 'git' (a plain command name) and to a lesser extent 'run_shell' which still matches the pattern, so only a minor deviation.
Tool Count4/5
10 tools is within the ideal range, but the redundancy of run_python and run_cpp with run_code makes the set feel slightly over-scoped. Still, the count is reasonable for a terminal/file server.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers git, shell, file read/write/edit/list, and code execution, which is solid for a terminal. Minor gaps include no delete_file or rename operation, but these can be worked around with run_shell.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues