Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to lsth-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for safe .xlsx inspection and controlled workbook writes, enabling spreadsheet reads, search, filtering, aggregation, and preview-based writes with workspace confinement and audit logging.
      12
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading and inspecting local Excel files (.xlsx, .xlsm, .xls, .xlsb, .ods) with tools for inspecting metadata, reading ranges, and profiling structure.
      3
      9 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for accurately reading and writing Excel .xlsx files while preserving structure, styles, and formulas. Provides tools for inspecting, editing, and aggregating spreadsheet data, with optional LibreOffice recalculation.
      20
      32 PyPI
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A security-first, read-only MCP server that lets clients browse and read text, PDF, and XLSX files from an explicit allowlist of local folders, with strict path and secret protections.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading and writing .xls (Excel 97-2003) files, enabling data manipulation, sheet listing, and metadata retrieval.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    file_search and file_tree both accept queries and return file matches, and file_list overlaps with simple enumeration. The descriptions clarify flat list versus tree output, but an agent may still hesitate when choosing among the three discovery tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a predictable resource-first snake_case pattern like file_read, csv_write, identity_resolve, and bom_extract. A few names such as excel_sheets, program_status, and audit_tail are noun phrases rather than command-style, but the overall convention is readable and consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    16 tools sits in the borderline-heavy range, and the three file-discovery tools plus three format-specific writers add some redundancy. The domain-specific tools for identity, templates, techpack/BOM processing, status, and audit appear purposeful, so the count is not excessive for the intended workflow.

    Completeness3/5

    File discovery, read/write, format export, parsing, and audit coverage are present. Obvious gaps remain: no file delete/move/update, no template listing, and truncated file searches have no continuation mechanism, so agents may hit dead ends in larger scans.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues