No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 8 tools
The tools mostly target distinct actions: listing findings, fetching one finding, summarizing posture, changing status, health checking, getting fix context, and verifying evidence. The main overlap is between list_findings and get_fix_context, both of which surface vulnerabilities, though the descriptions differentiate read-only listing from scan-and-remediate guidance.
Most names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_findings, get_finding, resolve_finding, mark_false_positive, get_fix_context, verify_evidence. The exception is health_check, which is a noun phrase rather than a verb-led tool name, but the overall convention is still predictable.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a security findings server. Each tool maps to a meaningful operation across listing, investigation, remediation, triage, auditing, and diagnostics, without obvious filler.
The server covers the core vulnerability lifecycle: listing, detail inspection, summary posture, resolution and false-positive triage, remediation context, evidence verification, and health diagnostics. Minor gaps remain, such as no explicit tool to trigger or manage remote scans, no repo/monitored-repository listing beyond summary counts, and no reopening or status-history operation.