get_star_report

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description does not explicitly state that this is a read-only operation or disclose any auth requirements or rate limits. Only states it gets a report, which is minimally informative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise with a clear title (bilingual) and explanation followed by parameter list. No wasted words, but the Chinese title and English description could be combined slightly more efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers parameters and basic purpose, but lacks details on return format, pagination behavior beyond defaults, and does not differentiate from similar report tools. Given no output schema, more detail would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description provides an Args section with format hints (YYYY-MM-DD for dates) and defaults (page=1, page_size=20, max 100), adding significant value beyond the schema which has no descriptions. Schema coverage 0% means description fully compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it gets a performance report for Star influencer marketing campaigns, specifying metrics included (reach, engagement, conversions, etc.). Distinguishes from sibling report tools like get_campaign_report or get_creative_report by explicitly mentioning 'Star'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied by name and description that this is for Star campaign reports, but no explicit guidance on when to use versus other report tools or when not to use it. Missing context on prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.