Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Systemonomic

Systemonomic

by TonyC23
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Systemonomic

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Summon-MCP

      ZionHopkins
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Objective-driven cognitive architecture engine that builds single experts, councils, or full autonomous organizations from user goals, generating deployment-ready superprompts and configurations.
      6 npm
      MIT

    • endiagram

      dushyant30suthar
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      12 deterministic graph-theory tools for structural analysis. Describe systems in EN syntax (subject do: action needs: inputs yields: outputs) — get topology, bottlenecks, blast radius, critical paths and lot more. No AI inside the computation.
      12
      98 npm
      8
      MIT

    • careerwin-mcp

      Richard-Ewing
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to resolve occupations into O*NET/ESCO work primitives, audit resumes against ATS gatekeepers, and simulate adversarial hiring committees for deterministic career verification.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some potential confusion between 'derive_task_suggestions' and 'generate_tasks_from_wda' as both generate tasks from WDA objects, with the former being described as 'more sophisticated.' The other tools are clearly differentiated, covering suggestion management, task creation, ATSS assessment, and listing operations.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with clear verb_noun structures (e.g., 'accept_suggestions', 'create_task', 'list_tasks'). This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to navigate, with no deviations in naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the server is well-scoped for managing tasks, suggestions, and ATSS assessments in a project automation system. Each tool serves a specific role in the workflow, from creation and listing to analysis and persistence, without feeling bloated or sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core workflows for task and suggestion management, including creation, listing, and assessment, but lacks update and delete operations for tasks or suggestions. This minor gap might require workarounds, but the overall surface supports the domain of project automation and AI-driven task analysis effectively.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessOutdated data

    Resources