Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to adhd-paper-visuals

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to create hand-drawn study-notes style graphics, including charts, concept maps, mind maps, timelines, sketch notes, and 2×2 matrices, as PNG images via MCP.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that renders AI-authored documents to images and returns typed diagnostics for self-correction. It also provides visual QA metrics, raster-to-vector reconstruction, and image-to-draft proposals.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to translate geometric bounding boxes, flowchart node connections, and architectural sketches into clean Mermaid graphs, JSON topology matrices, and boilerplate code scaffolds through MCP.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Renders Mermaid diagrams and Plotly charts to SVG, PNG, or PDF formats via the Model Context Protocol.
      2
      6 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables agents to create, customize, analyze and export relationship diagrams — theorem dependencies, paper maps, task RACI, org charts, conversation graphs — through 25 MCP tools, with cycle detection, centrality bottleneck reports, dependency closure and Mermaid/DOT/Markdown/JSON interop. Graphs stay local-first in a diff-friendly JSON source of truth and can be refined on a visual canvas.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    All five tools render distinct visual artifacts (evidence prism, paper map, section flow, concept analogy, formula structure), and the descriptions clearly delimit their scope. Minor overlap exists between paper map and section flow since both produce structural flowcharts, but the whole-paper vs. current-section distinction is stated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent render_<snake_case_noun> pattern with no deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a specialized paper-visual generator; each tool earns its place by targeting a different visual type.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers key argumentative and explanatory visuals for papers, but lacks tools for generic data plots/tables or updating existing diagrams. These are minor gaps that agents can work around given the server's focused purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues