Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
archprint_scanA

List the architecture rules this TypeScript repo already follows, with the evidence: each rule stated in plain words, whether it is AUTO (clears the confidence gate) or SUGGEST (short of it, worth review), how many files conform vs. break it, the files that break it, and the confidence. Read-only. path defaults to "." and a monorepo root scans every app.

archprint_recommendA

Recommend an architecture rule set for this repo from its evidence and detected stack: what to enforce now, what the code already follows that archprint reports but does not write a rule for yet (reportOnly), what to review before enforcing, and what comparable repos commonly adopt that this repo does not yet. Read-only.

archprint_explainA

Explain the confidence-gate evidence behind one rule from archprint_scan, by its label (e.g. AP-002, env-access, or "lib !-> app"): its statement, gate status, conformance stats, and every file that breaks it. Read-only.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.2/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: scan lists existing rules with evidence, recommend suggests a rule set, and explain drills into one rule from scan. There is no overlap in outputs or actions, and the descriptions make the boundaries explicit.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow the same archprint_<verb> snake_case pattern with clear, consistent verbs (scan, recommend, explain). No deviations or mixed conventions.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools are well-scoped for a read-only architecture analysis server, covering discovery, recommendation, and explanation without redundancy. Each tool earns its place and the set is not thin.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers listing existing rules, recommending a rule set, and explaining a single rule in detail, which is complete for a read-only advisor. A minor gap is the absence of a tool to export or apply rules, but that may be intentionally out of scope.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues