sonos_next

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The core behavior is described, but no details are given about edge cases (e.g., end of queue) or side effects. Since annotations are absent, the description carries the full transparency burden but provides only minimal context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded sentence with zero wasted words. Concisely conveys the essential action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple skip operation with one parameter, the description is largely complete. It explains what the tool does and what input is needed. Minor gap: no mention of output or status, but acceptable given no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description adds no additional meaning to the deviceId parameter beyond what is already in the schema's description. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action 'skip' and the resource 'next track in the queue', making the tool's purpose clear and distinct from siblings like sonos_previous or sonos_play.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., sonos_play_from_queue). The effect is implied but not differentiated in context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.