get_task_result

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Given no annotations, the description reveals that the tool returns an error if the task is not completed and returns 'content of the latest canvas'. This is decent but could mention idempotency or read-only nature.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with clear Args and Returns sections, no redundant information, and every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core functionality and error condition. With an output schema present, it does not need to detail return values further. Slight lack of usage context with siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description adds the meaning of task_id as 'The Tendem task ID (UUID)', providing format and type beyond the schema's raw 'string' type.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get the final result text from a completed Tendem task', specifying the action, resource, and scope. It distinguishes itself from siblings like get_all_task_results and get_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it should be used for completed tasks (returns error otherwise), but it does not explicitly compare with alternatives like get_task or get_all_task_results, nor provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.