Skip to main content
Glama
Tobias-Conrad

WebinarIgnition MCP Server

by Tobias-Conrad
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to WebinarIgnition MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • wordpress-mcp

      cvrt-jh
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered WordPress management via MCP, with 158 tools for posts, pages, media, plugins, themes, users, comments, and more, plus token-optimized responses.
      277
      1,128 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Agentimus MCP Server

      heera
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to interact with WordPress sites over MCP, providing read-only tools for AEO/GEO readiness, AI visibility, traffic, request logs, bot identification, page checks, and schema/markdown previews, plus opt-in write tools to draft, edit, and publish posts with permission checks and auditing.
      2
      GPL 2.0

    • WordPress MCP Server

      InstaWP
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with a WordPress site, allowing content and taxonomy management (list, create, update, delete) through 17 MCP tools.
      2
      -

    • Factosys MCP

      SantosSjba
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to manage WordPress sites by providing tools for posts, media, users, plugins, menus, widgets, comments, options, and system administration over the MCP protocol, with support for application passwords and OAuth 2.1.
      GPL 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: wi_webinar handles all non-destructive planning, setup, connection, and ability execution, while wi_webinar_delete is explicitly restricted to destructive deletion/replacement abilities. The boundary is reinforced by the description of wi_webinar, which points to wi_webinar_delete for destructive operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools share a consistent 'wi_webinar' prefix, which ties them to the domain. However, the main tool is named as a bare noun (wi_webinar) rather than following a verb_noun pattern like its counterpart (wi_webinar_delete), a minor deviation from ideal consistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools for a broad domain (webinar planning, writing, WordPress connection, ability execution, deletion, Q&A, handoff), the surface feels thin. While consolidating many actions into a single parameterized tool is a valid design choice, the low count borders on under-provisioned.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the full lifecycle: planning, content generation, site connection, running non-destructive abilities, destructive deletion/replacement, handoff, and technical status. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit list or update tools, though abilities likely fill these), but the core workflows are well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources