aptos-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| create_aptos_projectC | |
| generate_aptos_componentC | |
| test_aptos_contractC | |
| create_aptos_indexerC | |
| create_gas_stationB | |
| aptos_abi_generateC | |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| create_new_project_prompt | Prompt template for creating a new Aptos project |
| debug_move_contract_prompt | Prompt template for debugging Move contract errors |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: generating ABI, creating indexers, creating projects, creating gas stations, generating components, and testing contracts. The descriptions specify different resources and actions, making misselection unlikely.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'aptos' as a prefix (e.g., create_aptos_project, generate_aptos_component), except for 'aptos_abi_generate' which uses noun_verb order. This minor deviation slightly breaks the pattern but maintains overall readability.
With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for an Aptos development server, covering key operations like project setup, component generation, and testing. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or insufficient for the domain.
The toolset covers creation and testing aspects well but has notable gaps in lifecycle management, such as updating or deleting projects/components, and lacks deployment or interaction tools (e.g., deploy_contract, call_function). This limits full workflow coverage for Aptos development.