web_map

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No behavioral details are provided beyond the basic purpose. There are no annotations to supplement, so the description alone should disclose any side effects, rate limits, or limitations; it does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, direct, no filler. It is front-loaded and concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the schema covers parameter details and an output schema exists, the description lacks guidance on when to use this tool, the meaning of the mapping concept, and how it compares to sibling web tools. This makes it incomplete for a tool with moderate complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already covers all six parameters with descriptions (100% coverage), so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional parameter information.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool maps a website's URL structure using Tavily Map, which is a specific action and resource. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like web_search or web_fetch, but the concept of 'mapping URL structure' is distinct enough.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no indication of when to use this tool versus alternatives like web_search or web_fetch. No context on typical use cases or exclusions is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.