MCP Weather
Servidor meteorológico MCP
Un servidor de Protocolo de Contexto de Modelo (MCP) que proporciona pronósticos meteorológicos diarios y por hora mediante la API de AccuWeather.
Inicio rápido
Necesita una clave API de AccuWeather (nivel gratuito disponible).
Regístrate aquí y crea una aplicación para obtener tu clave.
Exporte su clave API como una variable de entorno:
export ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY=your_api_key_hereLuego ejecute el servidor meteorológico MCP directamente con:
npx -y @timlukahorstmann/mcp-weatherO bien, para acceso HTTP/REST a través de supergateway :
npx -y supergateway --stdio "npx -y @timlukahorstmann/mcp-weather" \
--port 4004 \
--baseUrl http://127.0.0.1:4004 \
--ssePath /messages \
--messagePath /message \
--cors "*" \
--env ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY="$ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY"Related MCP server: Weather MCP Server
Ejemplo de configuración del servidor MCP
Para la integración con Claude Desktop u otros clientes compatibles con MCP, agregue esto a su configuración (por ejemplo, claude_desktop_config.json ):
{
"mcpServers": {
"weather": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@timlukahorstmann/mcp-weather"],
"env": {
"ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here"
}
}
}
}Descripción general
Este servidor MCP permite que modelos lingüísticos de gran tamaño (como Claude) accedan a datos meteorológicos en tiempo real. Al integrarse con un LLM, permite al modelo:
Obtenga pronósticos meteorológicos precisos y actualizados
Proporcionar datos meteorológicos por hora para las próximas 12 horas.
Acceda a pronósticos meteorológicos diarios de hasta 15 días
Muestra datos en unidades métricas (°C) e imperiales (°F)
Ver información sobre temperatura, condiciones, precipitaciones y otros detalles meteorológicos.
Prerrequisitos
Node.js ≥18
Una clave API de AccuWeather (configurada a través de
.envo su shell)
Configuración
Clonar este repositorio:
git clone https://github.com/TimLukaHorstmann/mcp-weather.git cd mcp-weatherInstalar dependencias:
npm installObtenga una clave API de AccuWeather:
Regístrese en la API de AccuWeather
Crea una nueva aplicación y obtén una clave API
Crea un archivo
.envcon tu clave API:ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY=your_api_key_hereConstruir el proyecto:
npm run build
Uso con Claude Desktop
Configurar Claude Desktop para utilizar este servidor MCP:
Abra Claude Desktop
Vaya a Configuración > Desarrollador > Editar configuración
Agregue lo siguiente a su
claude_desktop_config.json:
{ "mcpServers": { "weather": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@timlukahorstmann/mcp-weather"], "env": { "ACCUWEATHER_API_KEY": "your_api_key_here" } } } }Reiniciar Claude Desktop
En una nueva conversación, habilite el servidor MCP haciendo clic en el ícono del enchufe y seleccionando "clima".
Ahora puedes pedirle a Claude pronósticos del tiempo como:
"¿Cuál es el pronóstico del tiempo por horas para la ciudad de Nueva York?"
"Dame el pronóstico de cinco días para Londres."
"¿Cómo estará el tiempo en Tokio esta semana en Fahrenheit?"
"¿Lloverá mañana en San Francisco?"
Herramientas disponibles
Pronóstico del tiempo por hora
Nombre de la herramienta:
weather-get_hourlyProporciona pronósticos por hora para las próximas 12 horas.
Parámetros:
sessionId(obligatorio): identificador único para la sesiónlocation(obligatorio): Ciudad o nombre de la ubicaciónunits(opcionales): "métricas" (Celsius, predeterminadas) o "imperiales" (Fahrenheit)
Pronóstico del tiempo diario
Nombre de la herramienta:
weather-get_dailyProporciona pronósticos diarios de hasta 15 días.
Parámetros:
sessionId(obligatorio): identificador único para la sesiónlocation(obligatorio): Ciudad o nombre de la ubicacióndays(opcional): Número de días de pronóstico (1, 5, 10 o 15; el valor predeterminado es 5)units(opcionales): "métricas" (Celsius, predeterminadas) o "imperiales" (Fahrenheit)
Desarrollo
Instalar dependencias de desarrollo:
npm installLimpie su código:
npm run lintConstruir:
npm run buildEjecutar pruebas:
npm testIniciar en modo de desarrollo:
npm run dev
Contribuyendo
¡Agradecemos sus contribuciones! No dude en enviar una solicitud de incorporación de cambios.
Mejoras futuras
Siempre buscamos mejorar el Servidor Meteorológico MCP. Estas son algunas de las características que estamos considerando para futuras versiones:
Pronósticos horarios extendidos: más allá de 12 horas, por ejemplo, 24 o 48 horas.
Alertas meteorológicas: integración con la API de alertas meteorológicas severas de AccuWeather.
Autocompletar ubicación: búsqueda de ubicación mejorada con sugerencias de autocompletar.
Datos meteorológicos históricos: acceso a condiciones climáticas pasadas.
Si tienes ideas para otras funciones, ¡no dudes en abrir un problema!
Licencia
Este proyecto está licenciado bajo la licencia MIT: consulte el archivo de LICENCIA para obtener más detalles.
Available Tools
2 toolsweather-get_dailyA
Get daily weather forecast for up to 15 days
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| location | Yes | The city or location for which to retrieve the weather forecast. | |
| days | No | Number of days to forecast (1, 5, 10, or 15). Default is 5. | |
| units | No | Temperature unit system (metric for Celsius, imperial for Fahrenheit). Default is metric. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
There are no annotations, so the description carries the behavioral transparency burden. It communicates a read-only forecast lookup via 'Get' and adds the 15-day maximum, but it does not disclose response shape, potential errors, timezone behavior, or whether any authentication is needed. For a simple read operation this is acceptable but not thorough.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It front-loads the verb and resource and immediately gives the key constraint of 15 days.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple weather lookup with three fully documented parameters, the description is largely complete and an agent can invoke the tool correctly. The only notable gap is that there is no output schema and the description does not hint at the shape of the returned forecast payload.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%: location, days, and units are all clearly documented in the input schema. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, which is acceptable because the structured schema already handles the documentation fully.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('daily weather forecast'), and the scope ('up to 15 days'). This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling tool weather-get_hourly without requiring any additional inference.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The word 'daily' and the tool name imply that this is for day-level forecasts rather than hourly ones, which is useful context. However, the description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus weather-get_hourly or provide any exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
weather-get_hourlyA
Get hourly weather forecast for the next 12 hours
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| location | Yes | The city or location for which to retrieve the weather forecast. | |
| units | No | Temperature unit system (metric for Celsius, imperial for Fahrenheit). Default is metric. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the scope (hourly, next 12 hours) and implies a read-only operation, but does not mention return format, error behavior, or data source limitations. It is adequate but not rich.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no filler. It front-loads the core action and scope, making it easy for an agent to process quickly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple two-parameter tool, the description is largely complete: it states the forecast type, granularity, and time window. It does not describe the return payload, but no output schema exists and the tool's purpose is straightforward enough that an agent can infer expected weather data fields.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters are already documented in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter-level details beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('hourly weather forecast') with a clear time bound ('next 12 hours'). This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling tool weather-get_daily, which is for daily forecasts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The time range and 'hourly' granularity imply when to use this tool, but the description never explicitly names the alternative or states when to choose it instead. The guidance is present by inference, not direct instruction.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
weather-get_daily - First observed
weather-get_hourly
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one provides daily forecasts for up to 15 days, while the other provides hourly forecasts for the next 12 hours. There is no overlap in functionality, and an agent can easily differentiate between them based on the time granularity and forecast duration.
Both tools follow a consistent naming pattern with a prefix 'weather-' followed by a verb_noun structure (get_daily, get_hourly). This pattern is predictable and enhances readability, making it easy for agents to understand the tool's purpose at a glance.
With only 2 tools, the server feels under-scoped for a weather domain. While the tools cover forecast retrieval, there are obvious gaps such as current weather conditions, historical data, or location-based searches, making the set too thin for comprehensive weather-related tasks.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for a weather server. It lacks essential operations like getting current weather, searching locations, or accessing historical data, which are core to weather applications. Agents will face dead ends when trying to perform basic weather queries beyond forecasts.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Hosted MCP server for Xweather weather data: conditions, forecasts, alerts, and more.
An MCP server for weather information by @kulybaba
An MCP server for weather information by @kulybaba
MCP server for weather with reasoning — umbrella advice, outdoor checks, city comparisons.
Related MCP Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides current weather information and 3-day forecasts for specified cities using the Open-Meteo API.1-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides weather information and forecasts based on user location or address input.612 npm8MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides real-time weather data and forecasts for any city.17 npmISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that interfaces with OpenWeatherMap API to provide real-time weather information and forecasts for cities worldwide.-