No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a clearly distinct action: scan_ticker (single-ticker risk), compare_tickers (batch comparison), find_wheel_candidates (put screening), and find_covered_calls (call screening). The single-vs-batch and put-vs-call boundaries are explicit in the descriptions, leaving little room for misselection.
All four names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (scan_ticker, compare_tickers, find_wheel_candidates, find_covered_calls). The plural 'tickers' in compare is minor and still readable.
Four tools is a lean but coherent surface where each earns its place, though it sits at the thin end of the ideal range. No obvious redundancy or bloat.
The workflow is well covered: single scan, multi-ticker comparison, and both screener directions (puts and calls), with missing tickers flagged for individual scanning. Minor gaps exist around analyzing existing positions or custom non-cached tickers, but agents can work around them.
