Skip to main content
Glama
Tiberriver256

Azure DevOps MCP Server

list_pipeline_runs

List recent pipeline runs in Azure DevOps, filtering by branch, state, result, and creation date to quickly locate specific builds.

Instructions

List recent runs for a pipeline

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
projectIdNoThe ID or name of the project (Default: MyProject)
pipelineIdYesPipeline numeric ID
topNoMaximum number of runs to return (1-100)
continuationTokenNoContinuation token for pagination
branchNoBranch to filter by (e.g., "main" or "refs/heads/main")
stateNoFilter by current run state
resultNoFilter by final run result
createdFromNoFilter runs created at or after this time (ISO 8601)
createdToNoFilter runs created at or before this time (ISO 8601)
orderByNoSort order for run creation datecreatedDate desc
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'list recent runs' without mentioning pagination, read-only nature, or that results are limited. Lacks transparency on important behaviors like filtering and sorting.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, highly concise and front-loaded. However, it is perhaps too brief given the tool's complexity. Could include a bit more context without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 10 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations. Description is minimal but covers basic purpose. However, it leaves gaps: does not explain return format or pagination behavior. Adequate but not complete for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Parameter descriptions in schema are comprehensive (100% coverage). The description adds no extra meaning beyond what schema already provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate since schema covers semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'List recent runs for a pipeline', which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_pipeline_run' (single run) and 'trigger_pipeline' (create run).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention context, prerequisites, or when not to use it. The description is purely declarative without usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Tiberriver256/mcp-server-azure-devops'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server