Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to billy-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Integrates Billy's accounting system with MCP, providing tools to manage invoices, contacts, products, payments, and more via natural language.
      15
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to work with Fortnox from an AI assistant to understand financial results, costs and liquidity, manage receipts and bookkeeping proposals, prepare invoices, track payments, and handle multiple companies with self-hosting. Manual verifications require approval before bookkeeping, with Fortnox as the persistent source of financial data.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and write Cynco accounting data, including querying books, creating invoices, reconciling transactions, and generating financial reports.
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage invoices, contacts, purchases, journal entries, and other accounting operations via the Fiken API.
      100
      14 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query and manage self-hosted accounting data—invoices, balances, and books—through natural language, with read-only tools by default and optional scoped write operations.
      30
      48 PyPI
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Danish accounting via Billy.dk API, enabling natural-language control over invoices, bank lines, reports, and more, with a write-guard for safety.
      65
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is potential confusion between list_daybook_transactions, list_transactions, and list_postings, which all deal with accounting entries. The descriptions help, but an agent might struggle to pick the right one.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names predominantly follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_invoice, list_contacts). However, billy_raw_request and execute_script break the convention, and the mix of 'list_' and 'get_' for single vs. multiple items is consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    40 tools is a large number for a server focused on a single accounting application. While each tool serves a specific purpose, the count is on the high end, potentially overwhelming for an agent.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core accounting workflows (contacts, invoices, bills, payments, journal entries, files). Notable gaps like sales tax returns or inventory are absent, but the raw_request tool provides an escape hatch.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues